Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh god.i actually made one for the G-man Toilet but i made it back before G-man got the whole upgrade shebang with flight and shield etc
TheGreatJedi13/Skibidi Toilet
vsbattles.fandom.com
As someone that was the main reason Peppa and Barney have profiles, I must clarify, that rule is nowadays on regards of pages written like "Tier -1 because of beating Super Saiyan 69 Dora in a game of Minecraft" and other silly/parody-like statistics not unheard of in Joke Battles Wiki. A character that isn't usually pictured in violent contexts or is an unusual thing to have a page for, yet is seriously indexed as a normal page, is indeed allowed and doesn't break this rule.This is a rather specific case that I don't believe our editing rules give a great deal of insight on. I share some of the same concerns as Agnaa, in the sense that it reuses assets from another verse, but I believe the setting itself is otherwise wholly original.at least, to the staggeringly little extent I'm willing to actually research this. I don't believe an original work can be passed as fanfiction on the basis of reused assets. Because of this, I don't believe anything in our rules would objectively disallow Skibidi Toilet profiles. But for the sake of argument, I would like to draw attention to this editing rule in particular:
"Preferably avoid adding character profiles that may be inappropriate or perceived to be in poor taste. This may include characters, weapons, etcetera, that are ill-suited for a statistics-indexing wiki, due to having no reliable feats, or ones from media which may be too controversial or otherwise unnecessary to be featured. This includes pages that would strictly be written as a joke, and as such more suitably belong in the Joke Battles wiki."
What this rule suggests is that, even if a profile may be of a legitimate source, it can be considered inappropriate for the main wiki if we deem it to be a joke page. Ultimately, I am not the arbiter of what would and would not be considered a "joke page". However, in this instance, I'm forced to ask what possible value we believe Skibidi Toilet would actually have as a verse on the wiki - if it wasn't for the fact that it's intentionally obscenely 'humorous' and called Skibidi Toilet, would we even give a passing thought to adding this verse to the wiki?
It's my honest opinion that the only perceived value this verse would have is in the fact that it would be funny to have it. If we are only making a page because it would be funny to have it, I'd firmly consider that to be a "joke page". As such, even if it is technically a legitimate verse, a profile which exists only because we'd find it funny (or for the 'meme value' of it) is, as the rules suggest, better suited to the Joke Battles Wiki by design.
sigh more skibidi toilet haters........No, we don't.
As for the question itself, besides using two (I think) copyrighted songs, there's also the fact that a lot of recurring characters in the series are just Half-Life characters who are stuck in a toilet.
This idea was forwarded on Discord when Tllm was talking about it there, and RvB is pretty much the standard I use to measure FC/OC content vs VSBW contentRooster Teeth has made deals with Microsoft with regards to what they can do with the series. The series goes far and away past what Microsoft currently lists as acceptable in their Game Content Usage Rules.
They allow RvB to exist as it does because of those business deals.
This belongs on FC/OC.
Its a fine standard to use I believe. Covers a lot of ground regarding the topic. It really feels like its one of those verses at the edge of allowable content, given the extent of legalese it had/has to go through to remain profitable and notable.This idea was forwarded on Discord when Tllm was talking about it there, and RvB is pretty much the standard I use to measure FC/OC content vs VSBW content
also, @Tllmbrg death for pinging me here
We have Peppa Pig pages, I really don't think the "quality" can go lowerI personally think that Agnaa makes sense here, and that these pages would likely bring down the average quality of our wiki.
the vsbw staff are too scared of tier 0 skidibi toiletNo fun allowed
Well, I am not fond of those either, but we don't have to deliberately continuously push further downwards for the sake of cheap giggles.We have Peppa Pig pages, I really don't think the "quality" can go lower
There is difference between a hobby being fun and a verse being a joke. Two different themes that are not connected.Powerscaling is a hobby, it’s meant to be fun, as long as it’s well regulated there’s no harm to be done.
Can we take a step back and think why we even need to be so picky with what we allow in the first place?
Pretty sure due to two famous music.Still, I am not even well informed regarding what this is except for pages about singing toilets that can lead towards the horror-genre and sometimes have over 1 billion views.
if it wasn't clear, I am against the YouTube GMod shitpost verse being added, yes.This idea was forwarded on Discord when Tllm was talking about it there, and RvB is pretty much the standard I use to measure FC/OC content vs VSBW content
also, @Tllmbrg death for pinging me here
if it wasn't clear, I am against the YouTube GMod shitpost verse being added, yes.
I am gonna bump this.Rooster Teeth has made deals with Microsoft with regards to what they can do with the series. The series goes far and away past what Microsoft currently lists as acceptable in their Game Content Usage Rules.
They allow RvB to exist as it does because of those business deals.
This belongs on FC/OC.
It's on FC/OC wiki already smh we don't want it on JBWgo to joke battles wiki
Skibidi Toilet already has several pages on FC/OC, further pages for the series ideally go there. Also not sure if staff only votes are being counted but if it is not clear I am against accepting Skibidi Toilet on VSBWWhere does Skibidi toilet scales to? I want to get into Skibidi toilet powerscaling.
Also, the verse should definitely be allowed on the wiki in my opinion. Here or on FC/OC.
Okay…. So for Peppa Pig, it is officially aired on TV.Skibidi is way more of a valid verse then Peppa Pig is, at the very least it's actually combat focused
If we don't allow of it of the basis of copyright idc, but let's not act like it'll lower the reputation of the wiki in any meaningful way
https://fcoc-vs-battles.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Skibidi_Toiletin other words, it's a death sentence regardless
rip peakity toilet
I mean, Agnaa did tally the votes with staffs only.Skibidi Toilet already has several pages on FC/OC, further pages for the series ideally go there. Also not sure if staff only votes are being counted but if it is not clear I am against accepting Skibidi Toilet on VSBW
It seems that's true.Skibidi Toilet already has several pages on FC/OC, further pages for the series ideally go there. Also not sure if staff only votes are being counted but if it is not clear I am against accepting Skibidi Toilet on VSBW
Oi Ziller, should I become a Skibidi Toilet powerscaler?in other words, it's a death sentence regardless
rip peakity toilet
Absolutely notOi Ziller, should I become a Skibidi Toilet powerscaler?
Basedten of PeakPeak*Garten of BanBan
I am not going to powerscale that cringy ass game that's only hyped up by unfunny idiots.Absolutely not
Garten of BanBan is better
Yes: 1 (Promestein)
Mobile Game Only: 1 (Agnaa)
No: 5 (DarkGrath, Maverick_Zero_X, Moritzva, Antvasima, Mr._Bambu)
Seems pretty decisive tbh.
You have failed to ignore my commentI am not going to powerscale that cringy ass game that's only hyped up by unfunny idiots.
Scaling Skibidi toilet would be funnier.
I'll ignore your comment.