• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

World of Darkness revisions

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that the page currently uses "possibly higher" or something similar.
 
For those not seeing the part I am talking about:

"Why would the names God or Infinity be unspeakable? The reason many religions forbid speaking the name of their God is because those religions consider divinity to be beyond definition; to name it is to limit it... and thus, to insult it."

Also, there's this: https://imgur.com/7ibwLSH

Then there's the Mage's who can become the Storyteller (GM/DM/etc.) who sees the verse as nothing more than fiction, these guy's draw their power from God, and once more, God is stated to be the supreme being of the Verse: https://imgur.com/b4KdNMe

There's also this as well, stating there's an unknown amount of higher Dimensions in which the Sons of Ether travel through, and that the Technocracy sees this as irrelevent information: https://imgur.com/7xoprwH
 
We did see it, you don't need to repeat it, we just don't think it warrants any higher possibility.

And no need to use such language either.
 
Thr c-word. It is forbidden by Fandom.
 
Really?

It seems like a incredibly minor word?

Eitherway, it was directed to myself, because of a lack of definite listed dimensions again.

Anyway, I think I've proven there can be more dimensions than just 11.
 
I have adjusted the word filter, so it should block all instances of both c-words from now on.

Don't take any chances though.
 
With there being no stated limit to dimensions (Even specifically stated to be unknown, to salt my wounds) I think "possibly far higher" makes sense, with the addition with the Mage's ability to see into Higher Dimensions, with there being no stated limit to it.

And then there' version 5 which will be coming out sooner or later which may give statements on how many dimensions there are.
 
If you find more stuff I can see others accepting the possibly far higher, but for now let's just stick with the suggested rating rather than drag out this longer.
 
I don't mind removing it, I'm just saying, there is justification for it.

Also, I am missing a few things for God as well.
 
ZacharyGrossman273 said:
Waiiiiit why does god have high godly and the ability to negate it
Surviving Paradise's destruction (Where Paradise was all creation)

Surviving in a Void stated to erase them, and deny existence, which is then stated to be equal to God in size.

Surviving being erased in all Dimensions
 
What is vague that Paradise:

1. Gave everything nigh-Infinite Meaning and layers.

2. Paradise was everything

Like, Zach, I know you like to Downplay, but you can stop now, because it's just getting obnxious.
 
ZacharyGrossman273 said:
"Nigh infinite meaning"
Ironically, this statement has no meaning

"Paradise was everything"

It was the first thing to exist, that's all.
1. This literally shows you haven't bothered to read the Screenshots at all.

2. No, it wasn't, this literally shows you've read NOTHING about the verse and are not knowledgable on the verse to pass judgement what so ever.

Paradice wasn't the first thing in the verse, not at all.

It was created after The Tellurian.
 
Udlmaster said:
1. This literally shows you haven't bothered to read the Screenshots at all.

2. No, it wasn't, this literally shows you've read NOTHING about the verse and are not knowledgable on the verse to pass judgement what so ever.
Udlmaster, I understand that your invested but these points above are Fallacy Red Herring. There are not arguments.
 
Nedge1000 said:
Udlmaster said:
1. This literally shows you haven't bothered to read the Screenshots at all.

2. No, it wasn't, this literally shows you've read NOTHING about the verse and are not knowledgable on the verse to pass judgement what so ever.
Udlmaster, I understand that your invested but these points above are Fallacy Red Herring. There are not arguments.
It's not even that, Zach isn't reading the scans, I've given him, he's doing this on another thread, literally doing it intentionally to gain a rise out of me, other people even debunked him before even I did.

It's so bad that KingofNegativity debunked him and underlined it before even I could point it out.
 
Udlmaster said:
Like, Zach, I know you like to Downplay, but you can stop now, because it's just getting obnxious.
Udlmaster said:
1. This literally shows you haven't bothered to read the Screenshots at all.

2. No, it wasn't, this literally shows you've read NOTHING about the verse and are not knowledgable on the verse to pass judgement what so ever.
Udlmaster, I understand that your invested but these points above are Fallacy like Red Herring and Appeal to motive. They are not arguments and too many of these fallacies can get you ban according to the Site Rules.
 
Well, to be fair:

Fallacy fallacy : Just because there is a fallacy, doesn't mean they're wrong.

Like, I'm not going to give Zach a personal lession on World of Darkness, when he can just read the above thread, it's getting increasingly annoying because he's doing this on other threads.

If anything, Zach is making Non-Sequiter and the Argument from Ignorence.

As for some random reason he's saying that Paradise was the first thing? Based on absolutely nothing and this:

""Oh, does it not ?"

Touhou has a reason for that though."

Ignoring the reasoning literally given on the page.

And, I know, the tu qoeque fallacy, but if I am getting it in the neck, then so can the other.
 
Nedge1000 said:
if debunked and he does not bring proper or new reasoning, Zach is making an argument from Argumentum ad nauseum, or argument from repetition.In any case, Zach can't do commit Fallacy anymore otherwise he could be subject to being ban from the wiki.
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2402480#264

You try should evaluate Zach's reasonings, independently from his past.
I have, and Zach is still doing it:

Could you please come to this thread, where this is all happening?: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2459594
 
The first thing could be decent, but it doesn't say that god survived the destruction of creation. Only that it was destroyed.

The second is EE resistance or NEP.

Being erased on multiple levels of existence isn't high godly by default. It'd kill high godlies who don't have feats on that level if it includes transcendent planes or something, but rezzing from that would just get you really good mid godly.
 
Wokistan said:
The first thing could be decent, but it doesn't say that god survived the destruction of creation. Only that it was destroyed.
The second is EE resistance or NEP.

Being erased on multiple levels of existence isn't high godly by default. It'd kill high godlies who don't have feats on that level if it includes transcendent planes or something, but rezzing from that would just get you really good mid godly.
We know God survived as Paradise is apart of the Tellurian/encompasses it, God is so powerful that he cannot interact with it because he'd destroy it, let alone dying from destroying a part of it.

And we know that the Angel's survived because Lucifer is still wandering the Earth, depowered.

NER?

When it says All Dimensions, it means Spatio-Temporal dimensions, as it's in reference to the Technocrats and their Dimensional science.
 
God surviving the destruction of Paradise isn't even Regenerationn, it is durability, I doubt she would have to reform from the destruction of something she views as infinitesimal, same thing with the Angels, unless it is explicitly stated that they reformed from it.

Surviving in a reality-denying Void is Resistance to Void Manipulation, though it seems pretty interesting, since I remember seeing a scan stating the Angels created the "superficial" Nothingness, and that the Void before was something even more primal and chaotic.

Not sure about the third one
 
Ultima Reality said:
God surviving the destruction of Paradise isn't even Regenerationn, it is durability, I doubt she would have to reform from the destruction of something she views as infinitesimal, same thing with the Angels, unless it is explicitly stated that they reformed from it.
Surviving in a reality-denying Void is Resistance to Void Manipulation, though it seems pretty interesting, since I remember seeing a scan stating the Angels created the "superficial" Nothingness, and that the Void before was something even more primal and chaotic.

Not sure about the third one
True for the full power Angels, but Lucifer would have to have the regen for it, as he's depowered at this time, same for the Demons, as they are slightly weaker than the Angels, as they no longer draw their power from God.

I went over the Void stuff with Dragon before, but with the new information, it could be higher than Mid-Godly.
 
Yeah and I'm saying this sort of 11D Erasure would kill a lot of high godlies, but regenning from it is just really strong mid. To get high, they'd need to survive the Erasure of the entire 11D structure, not just themselves.
 
@Nedge

Making fallacy arguments is not enough to get somebody banned, unless it is done in a very trolling manner.

Anyway, I think that Ultima Reality makes sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top