>See this thread:
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2309992 here
"infinitely above"
Dude, this isn't even hard, read your own thread, it's for infinitely above, it doesn't even talk about transcendant beings:
https://imgur.com/pdHYNg5
>In my last reply, I agree with 6D, possibly higher regarding it can be a 6D finite multiverse. Wasn't too sure about the 8D, but I let the staff members handle that one.
Already been accepted.
>I don't see any mentions of it being a level of dimensional transcendence over one another.
They are stated to be transcendant over themselves, I've said it multiple times, I am tired of repeating myself, if you want me to explain, read what I have put before, I've gotten people to agree with the 11-D scaling.
>No mentions of it being 11D from a statement that say this "Indeed mages who pass beyond the boundaries of a higher or lower plane, transcending or descending from existence as most mages know it"
What are you on about? No one has said there was an 11-D statement, we've talked about the String theory and Superstring theory parts, but no one has said there's an 11-D statements, and if you read the quote you just copied out, you'll see it even states, that they are transcending or decending, there's little left to the imagination.
This is also the Equivocation fallacy, it doesn't need to say "Dimensional transcendence" as transcendence already means that we need it too. If you want to say it isn't transcendence, then that's for you to prove, not for me to keep re-affirming.
>This isn't referring to higher dimensional beings, but mainly mages
And? The Mage's travel through Universes, can interact with the dimensions (as in Spatial-Temporal) and become the Storyteller, the literal GM, the being who sees the rest of the verse as fiction.
It focusing on the Mage's only adds to the reasoning, because the Mage's are already on that level.
