That's why you use recent information. The Light predates Creation as a whole and formed in the Darkness, which the Source matches that description. The Life Entity would be a lesser aspect of the Light which would be more akain to the feelings of sentient beings and/or the worlds. Nothing about it speaks as a grandiose case of it being the entirety of the Light.
. Just ridiculous to know. I meant, TGD isn't self-referential void, Ik that " Great Darkness that could only refer to itself through the presence of another " but it later said "total darkness/tgd can be only defined as total absence of light....life". Going back to previous sentence, it actually applies that " TGD could only refers to it self as total absence of light ". I meant, that's how Ram V wanted to describe.
That's not what story suggested, you are actually making ur own stuffs again. There's no " Source of oneness " or something, If old gods were able to see, New gods will able to.
It's not just feeling? it literally encompassess everything within + It even conflicted with TGD. I meant, Voice only rotate ain multiverse and It was manifested by Multiversal Presence, which basically mean Voice can't bring an entities that are beyond it influcence like omniversal entities.
bro's making his own lore again
Source of oneness and division isn't a thing, yes. I was mentioning of when the Source was whole and split throughout the story.
Then you've read wrong since I clarified your interpretation as nothing related to the comics.
Good you can see that.
That's headcanon. Assuming that the Voice is just Multiversal which wasn't supported even by your appersnt “scan.” Not to mention, I would like to see the Life Entityy mentioned again in modern comics where it embodies everything that's not the Great Darkness.
Its a very true and vernal statement. I'm not making a story.bro's making his own lore again
you are making ur own stuffs up again, just because the one we seen in Death of the new gods isn't True Source, it's simple.
We could honestly go with the changes. You and I hardly see why he's making these many randoms notions. I think it is rather obvious.
I disagree and I'm not the only one that's disagreeing and I'm not talking non-sense things or randoms, I'm just implying these things by basing on what comic said with full backup.
It is better to wait for more inputs first. Three or four agree (I can't remember with all this debate) and two disagree if I am not mistaken.
What was the point of your rant above then? Regardless, you're remaining neutral or agreeing?
