- 1,167
- 976
Garrixian has already fixed it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I already fixed his mistake on the Raiden Shogun page, though Woomica found another mistake on the Neuveilette page. I'll link him the CRT edits he made on that date, so it'll be easier to find any mistakes he made on other Genshin pages:
I am currently fixing mistakes that i found on genshin profilesI already fixed his mistake on the Raiden Shogun page, though Woomica found another mistake on the Neuveilette page. I'll link him the CRT edits he made on that date, so it'll be easier to find any mistakes he made on other Genshin pages:
User contributions for Aernasilver | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
i have fixed and applied stuff from previous accepted crts, some will have to be done trough crts such as nahida oneI think I need to point out something important and let this be a reminder to be careful when editing profiles, especially when handling content revision threads.
Raiden Shogun (Genshin Impact)
The Raiden Shogun (雷電らいでん将しょう軍ぐん, Raiden Shōgun?), true name Ei (影えい?), is the Electro Archon and the exalted ruler of the island nation of Inazuma. Despite her status as the incarnation of thunder itself, transient and instantaneous, she is committed to the pursuit of Eternity, the preservation...vsbattles.fandom.com
This edit was based on this content revision thread: https://vsbattles.com/threads/genshin-impact-cooking-in-speed-and-attack-potency.172310/
Scroll down to the speed rating, and you can see the speed being changed to Massively Hypersonic, since that rating was accepted for a period. Until Bambu disagreed with the Massively Hypersonic+ rating, and it got removed: https://vsbattles.com/threads/gensh...and-attack-potency.172310/page-3#post-6787295
@Aernasilver's edit: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Raiden_Shogun_(Genshin_Impact)?diff=prev&oldid=8759839
That section of the CRT (or anywhere in the CRT at all) didn't address or debunk Raiden's attack speed of CtG lightning itself and therefore is still a valid rating for her attack speed:
It was on her profile before the CRT got applied. When her speed was changed to Hypersonic, that Massively Hypersonic+ attack speed rating should've been reinstated.
Anyway, I'm sure Aernasilver forgot to reimplement Raiden's massively hypersonic+ attack speed by mistake. But this should be a reminder to be cautious and mindful when editing profiles and applying CRTs, and even upon fixing the mistakes of others.
Left them a warning message.stats changed with no CRT linked?
this isn't the first time he's done it either
Well according to this, he already had a 3 month block before and then received a 1 year one (though seems they appealed that as he came back barely a few months after)Given that they received previous warnings, and a previous 3 months block, and continued to vandalise almost immediately after it ended, I extended their block time to 1 year this time.
The abilities were explicitly rejected.@LephyrTheRevanchist @Catzlaflame
VIZION99 says that he was banned due to a misunderstanding.
Antvasima
community.fandom.com
I know we permanently block people like this, but I wonder if he could become a productive member of the community. I blocked him for a month and left him a welcome message/warning message, incase he reforms, if he doesn't reply, I'll extend it to a perma. let me know if this is too kind.This guy is clearly our for troll
Cat Noir
Adrien Agreste is the deuteragonist of Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir. He is a student at Collège Françoise Dupont and a fashion model. With his magical ring, inhabited by a Kwami named Plagg, he has the power of bad luck and can transform into the superhero Cat Noir. In "Reflekdoll"...vsbattles.fandom.com
I'm fine with a 6 months ban, considering he was excused and given another chance in the last ban. However, this time he shouldn't be given an opportunity to appeal, unlike last time. And if he comes back after that 6 months ban and commits the exact same violation, I'd rather go for a permanent rather than implement a year again.Also, VIZION99 wonders if his ban can be reduced to 6 months instead.
Antvasima
community.fandom.com
Btw, not all the changes were reverted. Striking for example still has "planetary" on it.A user named Unfilteredhater001 did a series of vandalisms on the RoR verse.
Fortunately another user has already reverted the changes, but I assume that what Unfilteredhater001 did should be reported here.
Twilight reverted it, I left them a message.Z-367 (Pandemonium)
Z-367 - Codename: Pandemonium was originally discovered submerged near a thermal vent within the Let-Vand zone during the initial excavation of the Hadal Blacksite. According to molecular data received from compositional analysis, Z-367's body is structurally similar to decomposing organic...vsbattles.fandom.com
been a few days since this edit, but user added non-canon material to the profile for the weakness section.
Left them a warning.A user named Unfilteredhater001 did a series of vandalisms on the RoR verse.
Fortunately another user has already reverted the changes, but I assume that what Unfilteredhater001 did should be reported here.
Which profile is this?Btw, not all the changes were reverted. Striking for example still has "planetary" on it.
Which profile is this?
Fixed.Thor (Record of Ragnarok)
Thor is a character in Record of Ragnarok, or Shuumatsu no Valkyrie, who acts as the first representative of the Gods in the first round of Ragnarok. In this bout, Thor battles humanity’s champion Lü Bu. Thor is the Nordic God of Thunder, and regarded as the pantheon's strongest warrior...vsbattles.fandom.com
Here's the one I noticed.
Fixed.
Left them a warning.Vandalism.User contributions for Riotsukatsuki1 | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
They deleted the warning, so I blocked them for 3 months.Left them a warning.
Also, VIZION99 wonders if his ban can be reduced to 6 months instead.
Antvasima
community.fandom.com
What do other staff members think about this?I'm fine with a 6 months ban, considering he was excused and given another chance in the last ban. However, this time he shouldn't be given an opportunity to appeal, unlike last time. And if he comes back after that 6 months ban and commits the exact same violation, I'd rather go for a permanent rather than implement a year again.
I share the same thoughts as garri.What do other staff members think about this?