- 3,174
- 2,418
Yeah nah. @ChoursDropoff asked me to help him with removing abilities from profiles due to his CRT passing grace.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah nah. @ChoursDropoff asked me to help him with removing abilities from profiles due to his CRT passing grace.
Your edits should be restored now.Yeah nah. @ChoursDropoff asked me to help him with removing abilities from profiles due to his CRT passing grace.
I mean, this is the guy who changed the results of a match and kept adding ratings to profiles without CRTs. Not only that, but the fact he kept removing your warnings on purpose (On top of being very toxic) to try to cover evidence of his warnings meant shows that there's something malicious about him with vandalizing these pages.I'm interested in hearing other staff opinions- this includes @GarrixianXD and @Psychomaster35, even if they lack a technical vote on the matter, they still dealt with him previously.
I honestly don't mind either way. If he's allowed back, I'm fine with it as long as he agrees to your stipulations and follows them: no changing match results without proper discussion and no deleting instructional messages or warnings from staff. If he breaks any of those terms, the agreement is immediately void. He should also be closely monitored.Bearat_Fearat, the user reported here, has requested an appeal here, stating now that he understands the error of his ways and will not continue to do them. Given the nature of his offenses, I am personally willing to allow this, under the caveat that any further offenses of this nature are regarded as instantly bannable for the immediate future. Furthermore, I would propose that two warnings be added to his profile for the Tracker, given that he received warnings already prior to joining the forum (which he is also attempting to do).
I share the same sentiment as Butler.I think this seems a fair deal, as it costs us little even if he does take the opportunity to one more minor act of vandalism but has a great deal of payout, should he turn out to be a productive member. An ounce of vulnerability for a ton of inclusion seems right. I'm interested in hearing other staff opinions- this includes @GarrixianXD and @Psychomaster35, even if they lack a technical vote on the matter, they still dealt with him previously.
@09Kayson09the user @09Kayson09 has been repeatedly editing the Bon the Rabbit page, upgrading his LS and adding LS calc links to his AP section. generally just making the page messy.
There is a CRT made that is adding this content that they're putting on, but that CRT hasn't been evaluated by mods.
edit: would've reported it sooner, but i only noticed it now.
I deleted it and told the user not to do it again.Random guy decided to create a "Mind Reading" page and blantly write nothing more than an insult in French (Translation in English is basically: Mind Reading is the ability to bang up nbx's mother)
Ant and me did requested him to provide reasons for his edits but he ignored them and continue his edit so yeah, ban him awayUser contributions for Jean Goldino | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
Vandalised shit tons of pages after coming back from a lengthy ban. Oh, and he also deleted warning messages off his wall (I restored them). I'd say cook him on the spot, considering his past ban was already a year.
We have reverted his revisions to pages.Have all of his unapproved revisions been reverted?
Anyway, yes, I think that you can ban him for a year.
Okay. That is fine then. Thank you for helping out.We have reverted his revisions to pages.
And no, he's getting banned indefinitely. He has already been banned for a year before. He had 3 bans total, a lot of warnings, and he deleted them.
Reverted and left them a warning.