• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

@DarkDragonMedeus @Mr. Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @Agnaa @Just_a_Random_Butler @DarkGrath @Dereck03 @Planck69 @Shadowbokunohero @QrowBarr @Crazylatin77 @Zaratthustra @ElixirBlue @Tllmbrg @Nehz_XZX @Therefir @IdiosyncraticLawyer @GarrixianXD @Catzlaflame @Vzearr @JustSomeWeirdo @Theglassman12 @Eficiente @DemonGodMitchAubin @Duedate8898 @Armorchompy @CrimsonStarFallen @LordTracer @Emirp sumitpo @EliminatorVenom @LephyrTheRevanchist @Deagonx @FinePoint @Elizio33 @Propellus @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Catzlaflame @ActuallySpaceMan42

Are any of you willing to help out here please? I currently have serious problems keeping up with all of my work. 🙏❤️
 
Sdjlakjh said:
9. I already made by defense in said CRT when I talked to you. My main argument is Lloyd conceding, therefore automatically agree to the changes (Except MK having fate resist since he's neutral on that part)
Click to expand...
Not replying doesn't mean they conceded. Even if they did, you would need it re-evaluted since he isn't a staff member.

The rest of the stuff seems worthy of a short ban or, if we're being kind, a strong warning.
 
Vzearr said:
Not replying doesn't mean they conceded. Even if they did, you would need it re-evaluted since he isn't a staff member.

The rest of the stuff seems worthy of a short ban or, if we're being kind, a strong warning.
Click to expand...
The entire point is Dark agrees to whatever Lloyd said. The main problem is that I already elaborated that Lloyd stopped arguing against me, but go went talk to another person in the thread. So it's very likely he conceded to my points

Can you elaborate your reasons?
 
Sdjlakjh said:
1. As I remember in this VSBW rule, you don't need to make CRT's if you are only adding more references
2. That one was already solved long ago, not relevant here
3. That's a long time ago too which I have already talked to Random Butler
4. Well it is already approved that Lady Bone Demon is a ghost beforehand. So I don't see the need to make a CRT for something so obvious
5. It doesn't need a CRT as I already elaborated with the Vsbw staffs about it in Questions and Answers. Ant himself said it's fine since it's a minor change
6. As I remember, it's fine to add it as Ant stated as long it's minor and you give an in depth explanation on it (the reason he gave me why he removed unconventional resist to mind manipulation)
7. My reasoning would be the same as number 1
8. Same reasoning as number 6
9. I already made by defense in said CRT when I talked to you. My main argument is Lloyd conceding, therefore automatically agree to the changes (Except MK having fate resist since he's neutral on that part)
10. Because it is already approved that Lady Bone Demon is a ghost and got absorbed by DBK. The question I ask was meant to get an approval if absorbing Ghosts count as soul manipulation or no. Since yes, Logically adding the resist would be fine since 3 things I mentioned were already approved beforehand

@Antvasima here my defense
Click to expand...
The fact that staff undid offenses does not render them inoffensive. You still, in your lack of adherence to the rules, essentially taxed the staff manpower in patrolling our edits to undo them. So it being a long time ago, and having been undone, doesn't render it non-evidence.

I will also state that self-evident revisions do still indeed require a CRT, just with only one staff approval as opposed to two.

The fact is that Spaceman has adequately given a list of offenses here and your defense essentially just amounts to "it was awhile ago, or I think it's fine". I will therefore give a strict warning and, with it, information.

  • There is no statute of limitations. No slight or crime on this wiki has an established period of time after which it has been committed that we will ignore it for that reason.
  • Every change of statistics or abilities requires a CRT. This does not mean you can substitute a CRT with a Questions and Answers thread- it must be a CRT, and it must receive official support. As previously mentioned, CRTs deemed self-evident by the staff can go ahead with only one approval- otherwise, they require approval from at least two staff members, or three if the verse is particularly notable.
  • Just because someone does not reply does not mean they concede. Nor does it fall to you in any situation to decide when someone concedes. Only the individual can explicitly state such a thing. If you are uncertain, do as you can to get a reply.
As such, most all of these instances are indeed rule violations, whether ignorant of the rules or otherwise. Bear the rules in mind from here on out, please.
 
Sdjlakjh said:
1. As I remember in this VSBW rule, you don't need to make CRT's if you are only adding more references
2. That one was already solved long ago, not relevant here
3. That's a long time ago too which I have already talked to Random Butler
4. Well it is already approved that Lady Bone Demon is a ghost beforehand. So I don't see the need to make a CRT for something so obvious
5. It doesn't need a CRT as I already elaborated with the Vsbw staffs about it in Questions and Answers. Ant himself said it's fine since it's a minor change
6. As I remember, it's fine to add it as Ant stated as long it's minor and you give an in depth explanation on it (the reason he gave me why he removed unconventional resist to mind manipulation)
7. My reasoning would be the same as number 1
8. Same reasoning as number 6
9. I already made by defense in said CRT when I talked to you. My main argument is Lloyd conceding, therefore automatically agree to the changes (Except MK having fate resist since he's neutral on that part)
10. Because it is already approved that Lady Bone Demon is a ghost and got absorbed by DBK. The question I ask was meant to get an approval if absorbing Ghosts count as soul manipulation or no. Since yes, Logically adding the resist would be fine since 3 things I mentioned were already approved beforehand

@Antvasima here my defense
Click to expand...
I do not remember this well at all, but if the changes are truly minor, self-evident, and improve the quality of the page, it is probably fine, but CRTs are always highly preferable. 🙏
 
Mr. Bambu said:
The fact that staff undid offenses does not render them inoffensive. You still, in your lack of adherence to the rules, essentially taxed the staff manpower in patrolling our edits to undo them. So it being a long time ago, and having been undone, doesn't render it non-evidence.

I will also state that self-evident revisions do still indeed require a CRT, just with only one staff approval as opposed to two.

The fact is that Spaceman has adequately given a list of offenses here and your defense essentially just amounts to "it was awhile ago, or I think it's fine". I will therefore give a strict warning and, with it, information.

  • There is no statute of limitations. No slight or crime on this wiki has an established period of time after which it has been committed that we will ignore it for that reason.
  • Every change of statistics or abilities requires a CRT. This does not mean you can substitute a CRT with a Questions and Answers thread- it must be a CRT, and it must receive official support. As previously mentioned, CRTs deemed self-evident by the staff can go ahead with only one approval- otherwise, they require approval from at least two staff members, or three if the verse is particularly notable.
  • Just because someone does not reply does not mean they concede. Nor does it fall to you in any situation to decide when someone concedes. Only the individual can explicitly state such a thing. If you are uncertain, do as you can to get a reply.
As such, most all of these instances are indeed rule violations, whether ignorant of the rules or otherwise. Bear the rules in mind from here on out, please.
Click to expand...
However, Bambu usually has a better sense of judgement than I do about these types of issues. 🙏
 
Sdjlakjh said:
The entire point is Dark agrees to whatever Lloyd said. The main problem is that I already elaborated that Lloyd stopped arguing against me, but go went talk to another person in the thread. So it's very likely he conceded to my points
Click to expand...
What? They said they agreed to his original points. If he goes onto to change his original points, dragon would need to re-evaluate the thread.
Sdjlakjh said:
Can you elaborate your reasons?
Click to expand...
You added abilities and resistances to profiles without a crt. Your excuse was that they're self explanatory when that's subjective.

A warning is fine. Maybe a short ban was too hasty from me.
 
Mr. Bambu said:
The fact that staff undid offenses does not render them inoffensive. You still, in your lack of adherence to the rules, essentially taxed the staff manpower in patrolling our edits to undo them. So it being a long time ago, and having been undone, doesn't render it non-evidence.

I will also state that self-evident revisions do still indeed require a CRT, just with only one staff approval as opposed to two.

The fact is that Spaceman has adequately given a list of offenses here and your defense essentially just amounts to "it was awhile ago, or I think it's fine". I will therefore give a strict warning and, with it, information.

  • There is no statute of limitations. No slight or crime on this wiki has an established period of time after which it has been committed that we will ignore it for that reason.
  • Every change of statistics or abilities requires a CRT. This does not mean you can substitute a CRT with a Questions and Answers thread- it must be a CRT, and it must receive official support. As previously mentioned, CRTs deemed self-evident by the staff can go ahead with only one approval- otherwise, they require approval from at least two staff members, or three if the verse is particularly notable.
  • Just because someone does not reply does not mean they concede. Nor does it fall to you in any situation to decide when someone concedes. Only the individual can explicitly state such a thing. If you are uncertain, do as you can to get a reply.
As such, most all of these instances are indeed rule violations, whether ignorant of the rules or otherwise. Bear the rules in mind from here on out, please.
Click to expand...
You don't understand my points

The thing is, I did a Q&A to elaborate for the things that happened in the verse or for something that beforehand approved upon

An example would be MK staff is approved to have soul manipulation ability. Since in the verse Azure has tanked attacks from the staff, I don't believe a CRT is required so hence I gave the soul manip resist to Azure

When I say awhile ago, they already reported me in the vandalism page but I already solved it by talking to them

So you have to make a CRT even if only for a single ability to be added? I see Q and A as a way so I don't get to spam and a more direct approach for the staff/members to be specialized in said specific ability

The main was Lloyd didnt bother to counter my arguments but instead, talked to another person in the same thread. Hence I see it as a concession
 
Vzearr said:
What? They said they agreed to his original points. If he goes onto to change his original points, dragon would need to re-evaluate the thread.

You added abilities and resistances to profiles without a crt. Your excuse was that they're self explanatory when that's subjective.

A warning is fine. Maybe a short ban was too hasty from me.
Click to expand...
Well I think is, I also have directly mentioned Dragon after Lloyd stopped attacking my arguments. Since he doesn't bother respond, I'll assume he agrees with it since from his statement, he agrees to whatever Lloyd mentioned
 
As previously stated, self-evident changes do require a CRT to be put through. You must understand this going forward. This includes things that should have been covered by a previous CRT, but was not approved regardless. And, yes, you must make a CRT even for a single ability.

You may see it as a concession. It was, however, not one, and that is the crux of the issue. You cannot argue another person's opinion for them, they must make it known.

I see a warning as adequate to encourage no further deviation from the rules.
 
Mr. Bambu said:
As previously stated, self-evident changes do require a CRT to be put through. You must understand this going forward. This includes things that should have been covered by a previous CRT, but was not approved regardless. And, yes, you must make a CRT even for a single ability.

You may see it as a concession. It was, however, not one, and that is the crux of the issue. You cannot argue another person's opinion for them, they must make it known.

I see a warning as adequate to encourage no further deviation from the rules.
Click to expand...
So you can't go ask staff member directly in a Q&A and say "does this count as "etc" ability? It has to be a CRT?

Well if you understand the basic of dialectal debate, that would be the case
 
Sdjlakjh said:
So you can't go ask staff member directly in a Q&A and say "does this count as "etc" ability? It has to be a CRT?

Well if you understand the basic of dialectal debate, that would be the case
Click to expand...
Yes.

I don't care. This wiki does not use dialectal debate to decide who agrees with what. We use explicit confirmation. I advise you to become accustomed to this.
 
Mr. Bambu said:
Yes.

I don't care. This wiki does not use dialectal debate to decide who agrees with what. We use explicit confirmation. I advise you to become accustomed to this.
Click to expand...
Well what we are doing is a discussion which utilizes dialects. The purpose of dialects is establishing points that keep the flow progressed, instead of halting or reversed so the pursue of truth is concrete
 
LordTracer said:
This vandalism is a few months old, but I just noticed it now.

@SageF made edits to Haku’s profile here and here, where he removed and changed parts of his speed justification. He linked a CRT, but if you actually look at that CRT, you’ll see that it’s from 2021 (and was applied in 2021 too) while he’s making these changes in 2024 - and the changes he’s making don’t line up with what the CRT was proposing.

I have a CRT currently up to fix these changes and some others, so no reversion needs to be made at the moment. However, I do know SageF has been warned multiple times before for making edits without a CRT, so I think some action needs to be taken here.
Click to expand...
Bump.
 
This user just edited Fate/Stay Night Lancer to remove a weakness without a CRT.
vsbattles.fandom.com

Lancer (Fate/stay night)

Lancer is the Lancer-class Servant of Bazett Fraga McRemitz during the Fifth Holy Grail War, but he becomes Kirei Kotomine's Servant after he ambushes Bazett and steals her Command Seals. His real name is Cú Chulainn, Ireland's legendary Child of Light, a great hero of the Ulster Cycle. A...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
Mageman460 said:
This user just edited Fate/Stay Night Lancer to remove a weakness without a CRT.
vsbattles.fandom.com

Lancer (Fate/stay night)

Lancer is the Lancer-class Servant of Bazett Fraga McRemitz during the Fifth Holy Grail War, but he becomes Kirei Kotomine's Servant after he ambushes Bazett and steals her Command Seals. His real name is Cú Chulainn, Ireland's legendary Child of Light, a great hero of the Ulster Cycle. A...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
I gave a warning message. 🙏

vsbattles.fandom.com

SupremeGilgamesh

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
LordTracer said:
This vandalism is a few months old, but I just noticed it now.

@SageF made edits to Haku’s profile here and here, where he removed and changed parts of his speed justification. He linked a CRT, but if you actually look at that CRT, you’ll see that it’s from 2021 (and was applied in 2021 too) while he’s making these changes in 2024 - and the changes he’s making don’t line up with what the CRT was proposing.

I have a CRT currently up to fix these changes and some others, so no reversion needs to be made at the moment. However, I do know SageF has been warned multiple times before for making edits without a CRT, so I think some action needs to be taken here.
Click to expand...
Theglassman12 said:
If he was warned several times and is still not listening, a week long ban might be in order.
Click to expand...
@SageF

What do you have to say for yourself?
 
All edits reverted. He's been warned before -- if he can't properly explain himself then might as well give him a lengthy ban.
 
Is somebody willing to log another strict warning to @SJG13673 's tally, or should we give him a temporary ban? 🙏
 
What was the nature of his previous warning? If it was the same as what he did here, a week/month ban would be fair in my opinion.
 
I do not know. My apologies. 🙏

Is somebody else here willing to investigate? 🙏
 
Self explanatory
vsbattles.fandom.com

Kanye West

Kanye west back when he was young "I drink a Boost for breakfast, an Ensure for dessert Somebody ordered pancakes, I just sip the sizzurp That right there could drive a sane man berserk Not to worry, Mr. H-to-the-Izzo's back to wizzerk
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
Ednaxel2 said:
Self explanatory
vsbattles.fandom.com

Kanye West

Kanye west back when he was young "I drink a Boost for breakfast, an Ensure for dessert Somebody ordered pancakes, I just sip the sizzurp That right there could drive a sane man berserk Not to worry, Mr. H-to-the-Izzo's back to wizzerk
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
I gave them a 3 months block for creating a blatant troll page. 🙏
Woomica said:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Raiden_Shogun_(Genshin_Impact)?action=history
This user Added MFTL+ speed without crt
Click to expand...
Given that they received two preceding warnings for light vandalism, I blocked them for 3 months as well. 🙏
 
No problem at all. 🙏🙂
 
Bambu and I handled it. 🙏

vsbattles.fandom.com

Mbikbi

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Deadguy999
Do I need to link edits
Replies
2
Views
521
Deadguy999
Deadguy999
Antvasima
  • Sticky
  • Featured
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
6K
Agnaa
Agnaa
Catzlaflame
  • Locked
Regarding the Rule Violations Report Thread
2
Replies
71
Views
7K
LephyrTheRevanchist
LephyrTheRevanchist
GrathOfLux
Proposal for Site/Forum Image Standards Revision
3 4 5
Replies
175
Views
10K
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
Mr. Bambu
  • Locked
Slight Adjustment to Rules Regarding Original Works
2 3
Replies
80
Views
9K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top