• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Venuzdonoa/Anos possible downgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
imZer0Null said:
You have yet to provide proof that world usually refers to planet.

Also, if you honestly think laws and concepts that make up the world refers to laws and concepts that maintain a planet then I'm not debating you anymore.
Click to expand...
Explain this to me because I want to hear it directly from you: What makes up a universe in Maou Gakuin? After that, logically explain why the laws and concepts that maintain the world aren't referring to the planet. You can act like you've won this argument as much as you've like, but you've not once provided any solid evidence to debunk my claims. All you've been doing thus far is parroting your own headcanon over and over. So, if you manage to go through each of my points and actually prove each of them wrong with solid evidence rather than headcanon I'll admit that I was wrong this whole time and end the argument here. If not, then you've just been wasting your time trying to prove a point without backing it up.
 
I agree. it sounds NLF to say that silver sea is included, sure the statements all of creation... but does silver sea really counted on that? The statements could just be within one universe. But don't knoww.
 
imZer0Null said:
If you think that world means planet, the burden falls on you to provide proof that it actually refers to a planet and not a universe, since most of the time world actually refers to a universe.
Click to expand...
Not most, since sometimes it could refer to a planet or a star. Also don't get the wrong idea, i don't disagree with world = universe on maou gakuen.

Edit
 
Worthless said:
I agree. it sounds NLF to say that silver sea is included, sure the statements all of creation... but does silver sea really counted on that? The statements could just be within one universe. But don't know.
Click to expand...
The thing is the statement says "Venuzdonoa can destroy all things in creation, regardless of how strong, eternal or infinite they are", meaning how strong, eternal or infinite Anos thought creation was is irrelevant, since he can destroy it regardless of those factors, and thus it isn't really nlf to say that the Silver Sea is included.
 
imZer0Null said:
The thing is the statement says "Venuzdonoa can destroy all things in creation, regardless of how strong, eternal or infinite they are", meaning how strong, eternal or infinite Anos thought creation was is irrelevant, since he can destroy it regardless of those factors, and thus it isn't really nlf to say that the Silver Sea is included.
Click to expand...
I doubt that. The all of creations could just maybe mean one universe. not literal the whole creations. also aren't the verse said each universe is an infinite size? Maybe the infinite is just within the one verse
Lormac_CC said:
Order:

The various laws that make up the world, or the power of the gods that keep these laws normal. There are various orders such as “time”, “creation”, and “destruction”.

Order are the laws that define how the universe works or the concepts that maintain how these laws function

Both scans show that orders are bounded to universes, in each world, there is an order which is bounded to that world. This is all fine and good but here is the problem, There isn't an order that bounds whole layers nor is their an order that bounds the entire Sliversea. Hence, he shouldn't be 2-B
Click to expand...
Yours are hella NLF. Sorry.
 
imZer0Null said:
You are trying to tell me that the concept of time (Order of time) only applies to a planet...

I also haven't been provided proof of world usually referring to planet, so there's nothing for me to disprove.
Click to expand...
The concepts and laws that uphold the world originate from and exist within the Blue Dome of the Gods. The author has made a clear distinction between the Blue Dome of the Gods being one thing and the world itself being another. So yes, the concepts and laws that uphold the world do refer to the planet and originate from the Blue Dome of the Gods. Then there's the infinite black skies that is literally just that. No concepts are applicable there.

Whether you want to acknowledge it as proof or not, it is definite proof. If you actually want to prove otherwise, take each of the claims I made in that comment and debunk/refute them like I did for yours. If you're not capable of doing that, then anything you say afterwards is utterly pointless.
 
But still. Doesn't this sound NLF to say that silver sea is included? Most of the time The "all of creations feats" in fiction could just mean one universe. But don't know.
 
Oblivion_Of_The_Endless said:
That order argument doesnt work since Venuzdonoa's order isnt limited to its universe of origin
Click to expand...
Neither is the Sun of Ruin. Just because Venuzdonoa can still exert it's Order in the Silver Sea doesn't mean that it's as OP as it was in the Militia World. In the first place, Anos hasn't actually tried to destroy the entire Militia World so we can't compare Venuzdonoa in the Militia World not shown at it's best to Venuzdonoa in the rest of the Silver Sea not shown at it's best. Venuzdonoa at it's best in the Militia World is destroying anything no matter how eternal or infinite, that may not be the case in the rest of the Silver Sea.
 
AncientKing95 said:
Neither is the Sun of Ruin. Just because Venuzdonoa can still exert it's Order in the Silver Sea doesn't mean that it's as OP as it was in the Militia World. In the first place, Anos hasn't actually tried to destroy the entire Militia World so we can't compare Venuzdonoa in the Militia World not shown at it's best to Venuzdonoa in the rest of the Silver Sea not shown at it's best. Venuzdonoa at it's best in the Militia World is destroying anything no matter how eternal or infinite, that may not be the case in the rest of the Silver Sea.
Click to expand...
Again you're just ignoring the fact that Venuzdonoa is a deep magic, meaning it's still as OP in deep layers.
 
AncientKing95 said:
What we know is that Pre-Silver Sea, nobody from the Militia World, not even Militia herself knew of the existence of the bubble that they resided in, much less the Silver Sea. So when they used the term world, it wasn't referring to the entire bubble that qualifies as a universe. As it's been made clear that the largest part of the universe are the infinite black skies (as well as the Blue Dome of the Gods that reside in them), and that the infinite black skies and the world aren't one and the same, we know for certain that the term 'world' can refer to the planet. Context-wise, it also makes sense that 'world' refers to planet the majority of the time.

P.S: Make sure to click the 'Click to expand' part as that is where the bulk of my evidence and debunking resides.
Click to expand...
I have nothing really to debunk here since you only quoted parts that supported your argument.

Here's one of the entire quotes. Please read this twice, first time replacing the word "world" with planet, and second time replacing the word "world" with universe.

It's called the 'outside world' but no one has ever seen anything outside this world. Even if it were another space or another world, it must be something within this world after all.

'That being the Creator God? You mind telling us directly what the end of the world looks like?

'All right.

Misha stood up and walked forward, sending her magic to the blackboard.

'Above the sky and below the earth, a black dome stretches out.

What was added around the world drawn on the blackboard was a black sky, a black dome.

'The farther you go from this earth, the more the black dome is stretched and the closer you get to nothingness. It is here, in this near-infinite sky, that the divine world is located.

A 'Blue Dome of the Gods' is added to the black dome.

'This black dome stretches on forever with no end.

'Why not fly faster than the black dome can stretch?

'Because when you fly up to the sky, you'll just end up coming from below the earth.

'In other words, the space in this world is not even, but distorted. I thought I flew up but the direction changed naturally and I went around the world and came out from below. You could say this world has a sphere system.

Eldemade added to the diagram on the blackboard, making the world a sphere.

'Outside of this sphere, it can be thought that an order different from our world has created a different sphere. Another world, perhaps?
Click to expand...

Again, if you bring me actual proof that shows me world usually refers to planet, then by all means I'll try and debunk it, but so far you've just quoted stuff that support your argument and made baseless and contradictory statements.
 
imZer0Null said:
Again you're just ignoring the fact that Venuzdonoa is a deep magic, meaning it's still as OP in deep layers.
Click to expand...
<Egil Grone Angdroa> is a deep magic that's still OP in deep layers. That doesn't mean that it can destroy the entire Silver Sea. Yet again, Anos is the one who made that statement of Venuzdonoa being able to destroy anything no matter how eternal or infinite, and with context to just the Militia World, not the entire Silver Sea. This statement was made in 1st-person perspective not objectively. What Anos thought of as "no matter how eternal or infinite" is relevant, as that's what his statement is based upon. Just because Venuzdonoa is still OP in the Silver Sea doesn't mean that it's still the end-all, be-all that it was in the Militia World. In the first place, it's highly unlikely that Anos himself could destroy the entire Silver Sea, as he hasn't even come close to destroying an entire layer.
 
imZer0Null said:
I have nothing really to debunk here since you only quoted parts that supported your argument.

Here's one of the entire quotes. Please read this twice, first time replacing the word "world" with planet, and second time replacing the word "world" with universe.



Again, if you bring me actual proof that shows me world usually refers to planet, then by all means I'll try and debunk it, but so far you've just quoted stuff that support your argument and made baseless and contradictory statements.
Click to expand...
My point was that most of the time world refers to planet. So I only quoted statements relavent to that. That doesn't mean that world can't refer to other things as well, it's just that it had nothing to do with the point I was trying to make.

Even in the entire quote, world has also been used to refer to the planet, like in this statement "What was added around the world drawn on the blackboard was a black sky, a black dome", so what's your point? If everything that is a part of the universe within a bubble consists of the world, the Blue Dome of the Gods and the infinite black skies, then world clearly refers to the planet most of the time.

Prove that any of my statements were baseless and contradictory. I've provided evidence for my claims in regards to the usage of the term 'world', and everything I've said has fallen in line with each other. If you're going to tack on a claim like that, you should be able to prove it.
 
AncientKing95 said:
My point was that most of the time world refers to planet. So I only quoted statements relevant to that. That doesn't mean that world can't refer to other things as well, it's just that it had nothing to do with the point I was trying to make.
Click to expand...
Yeah and that's not how this works. You can't just provide the quotes that support your argument.

AncientKing95 said:
like in this statement "What was added around the world drawn on the blackboard was a black sky, a black dome", so what's your point? If everything that is a part of the universe within a bubble consists of the world, the Blue Dome of the Gods and the infinite black skies, then world clearly refers to the planet most of the time.
Click to expand...
Exactly. This one single line is the only one where world could refer to planet. During the rest of the quote, world referring to planet makes no sense.

Also, it isn't that uncommon for a single universe to contain universe sized realms within it.
 
Last edited:
imZer0Null said:
Yeah and that's not how this works. You can't just provide the quotes that support your argument.


Exactly. This one single line is the only one where world could refer to planet. During the rest of the quote, world referring to planet makes no sense.
Click to expand...
In this case, I can provide only quotes that support my argument. Because they prove without a shadow of a doubt that my argument is correct. The rest of the quote(s) are irrelevant, because they still don't disprove anything I said. So it would be a waste of space showing the entire thing.

Wouldn't make sense in this quote, sure. However, world is used many more times throughout the series than just seen in this one particular quote. And given context, you can tell that it usually refers to planet. Like pretty much anytime something says that the world has been damaged or could be destroyed in some way.
 
AncientKing95 said:
.
Click to expand...
You still don't get it... No. 20

If you can provide me with multiple quotes, not just the parts that support your argument, that proves that during the entire series world only refers to planet, then I'll try and debunk that.

Remember to add the entire quote and give a chapter number, so you can't commit any more fallacies.
 
Worthless said:
Most of novel example: clearing an isekai or i was caught up in hero summoning.
Click to expand...
Give example or quote, or it'd be dishonesty since there is no way that "all of creation" does only refer to one universe in multiversal cosmology, unless the verses you were talking about have only one universe within them. all of creation is one of the most blatant way to describe all of existence, whole cosmology. Anos could destroy worlds, his ability can affect the deeper layers. "Venuzdonoa has no feat to affect the Silver Sea!" when the statement does say that it can destroy all of the creation, or everything, is as worth as an AOE fallacy, the absence of evidence is not the evidence of an absent. To say all of creation here does not mean all of creation, you need proofs.

The argument regarding 'world = planet' doesn't make sense since I'm sure MGKF is never happen to refer planets as worlds, in contrary, it does refers the near-infinite bubbles with their own spacetime as worlds (I don't even remember this verse has the usage of planets or universes as noun, unless I'm missing something here I'm fine fine for y'll to correct me). So it is true that you as well need proofs to say that worlds in the context here is limited to planets.
 
imZer0Null said:
You still don't get it... No. 20

If you can provide me with multiple quotes, not just the parts that support your argument, that proves that during the entire series world only refers to planet, then I'll try and debunk that.

Remember to add the entire quote and give a chapter number, so you can't commit any more fallacies.
Click to expand...
Holy shit! I literally never said that that world only refers to planet throughout the entire series. I said most of the time. At this point you're just deliberately misinterpreting what I'm saying.
 
AncientKing95 said:
Holy shit! I literally never said that that world only refers to planet throughout the entire series. I said most of the time. At this point you're just deliberately misinterpreting what I'm saying.
Click to expand...
My bad.

If you can provide me with multiple quotes, not just the parts that support your argument, that proves that during the entire series world only most of the time refers to planet, then I'll try and debunk that.

Remember to add the entire quote and give a chapter number, so you can't commit any more fallacies.
 
GreatIskandar14045 said:
Give example or quote, or it'd be dishonesty since there is no way that "all of creation" does only refer to one universe in multiversal cosmology, unless the verses you were talking about have only one universe within them. all of creation is one of the most blatant way to describe all of existence, whole cosmology. Anos could destroy worlds, his ability can affect the deeper layers. "Venuzdonoa has no feat to affect the Silver Sea!" when the statement does say that it can destroy all of the creation, or everything, is as worth as an AOE fallacy, the absence of evidence is not the evidence of an absent. To say all of creation here does not mean all of creation, you need proofs.

The argument regarding 'world = planet' doesn't make sense since I'm sure MGKF is never happen to refer planets as worlds, in contrary, it does refers the near-infinite bubbles with their own spacetime as worlds (I don't even remember this verse has the usage of planets or universes as noun, unless I'm missing something here I'm fine fine for y'll to correct me). So it is true that you as well need proofs to say that worlds in the context here is limited to planets.
Click to expand...
Read post #112 (and make sure to 'Click to expand') and you'll understand.
 
AncientKing95 said:
There is not a single fallacy about it. I only provided relavant quotes. You could literally add any other quote from the series into there and it wouldn't disprove my point. So it would be a waste of space to add it.
Click to expand...
Wut..?

AncientKing95 said:
In this case, I can provide only quotes that support my argument. Because they prove without a shadow of a doubt that my argument is correct. The rest of the quote(s) are irrelevant, because they still don't disprove anything I said. So it would be a waste of space showing the entire thing.

Wouldn't make sense in this quote, sure. However, world is used many more times throughout the series than just seen in this one particular quote. And given context, you can tell that it usually refers to planet. Like pretty much anytime something says that the world has been damaged or could be destroyed in some way.
Click to expand...
Right here you admitted that when looking at the entire quote, and not just the single line that proved your argument, that it wouldn't make sense...
 
SupremeNiva said:
I like maou gakuin downgrade
Click to expand...
Your opinion is so stupid that makes me laugh and cry at once, thats not even a reason to downgrade
vbpy48ezwfm31.png
 
GreatIskandar14045 said:
Give example or quote, or it'd be dishonesty since there is no way that "all of creation" does only refer to one universe in multiversal cosmology, unless the verses you were talking about have only one universe within them. all of creation is one of the most blatant way to describe all of existence, whole cosmology. Anos could destroy worlds, his ability can affect the deeper layers. "Venuzdonoa has no feat to affect the Silver Sea!" when the statement does say that it can destroy all of the creation, or everything, is as worth as an AOE fallacy, the absence of evidence is not the evidence of an absent. To say all of creation here does not mean all of creation, you need proofs.
Click to expand...
Again that's an NLF. All of creations usually only refers to a one universe, sure some refers to all universe but not In this case, since It's kinda doubting if he can really destroy including the silver sea.

The OP already pointed it, that anos made the "all of creation" statement before the silver sea was introduced. Insanely vague, and most of it is an assumption that leads to no limit fallacy. This'll just repeat over and over, so I'm out. I still think it's an NLF.

And yes Multiverse does exist in the novel I've mentioned.
 
imZer0Null said:
My bad.

If you can provide me with multiple quotes, not just the parts that support your argument, that proves that during the entire series world only most of the time refers to planet, then I'll try and debunk that.

Remember to add the entire quote and give a chapter number, so you can't commit any more fallacies.
Click to expand...
Can we acknowledge (that at the very least) no-one else aside from the Gods Pre-Arc 9 knew what the Blue Dome of the Gods or the infinite black skies were? Which make up a large chunk of the universe not including the world. Now, take every instance a non-God character Pre-Arc 9 used the term world. What do you think they were referring to?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
Anos Magic Eyes and Venuzdonoa Revision
Replies
16
Views
3K
AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
  • Locked
Additions for Anos Voldigoad
Replies
7
Views
2K
AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
AnosVoldigoadDemonKing
fandom_29dan
  • Locked
Maou Gakuin; In An Overarching View of the Light Novel's Scaling
Replies
5
Views
2K
EldemadeDityjon
EldemadeDityjon
Tatsumi504
  • Locked
Maou Gakuin: Anos and Cosmology Additions
2 3
Replies
85
Views
10K
Tatsumi504
Tatsumi504
Guileal
Anos Voldigoad Immortality Type 6 removal
Replies
29
Views
3K
Tatsumi504
Tatsumi504
Back
Top