- 43
- 26
Why do you think of it that way?
Sorry if my English is bad, I partially use gogle translite to help me.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Upgrade for the Gods ability. Maou Gakuin
- Thread starter Fixxed
- Start date
- Status
Sorry if my English is bad, I partially use gogle translite to help me.
- 140
- 59
Tbf your first msg’s were ******** on anos fans, doesn’t give off the fair discussion vibe.
- 4,843
- 2,730
You forgot to add me to neutral.
I already said on the first page that causality manipulation shouldn't be there, at best it'll only be for the god of time. That scan mostly has to do with type 1 acausality.
The 3rd one might qualify for probability manipulation but the said character doesn't have any other showings of the ability. At best it's fate hax (which all gods have) and the ability to bless others so power bestowal I guess.
There's nothing else to do here actually if the reasons for plot were too flimsy and vague
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
Nah only thing here i see is you hate Anos supporters which is backed up by your own comments. Really you have no right to criticize others for agreeing.
You are literally criticizing others for agreeing and when people points out your mistakes you turn into defensive
. Man this kinda behaviour doesn't make you look like Chad to others. Stop with the criticizing
- 140
- 59
Just the low amount of msg’s on your account, how you came a short amount of time after glassman said plot was basically rejected, account made the same day as Dog3352. Things like that
- 3,456
- 791
It wasn't actually. My first message was me disagreeing which people dogpiled onto with 3-4 replies in less then 30 seconds.
- 1,222
- 688
I don't fully know the wiki standard, so I don't know, but if someone disagrees for no valid reason, it sounds like someone who shouldn't even be on the topic.
- 3,456
- 791
Well evidently the presented information isn't as one sided as verse supporters think it is because the votes disagree with your premise.
- 4,843
- 2,730
One more comment from that smart mouth of yours and it's the RvR thread for you. Why don't you go learn their main language so their comments would be easily understandable for you?
- 1,222
- 688
Well, I made my account a few months ago, but I don't like participating in CRTS, and it's a miracle I'm participating in this one.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
Stop with derailing.
- 3,456
- 791
go ahead my guy, I haven't done anything wrong. Just pointing out how many freshly made accounts are agreeing with terrible english.
- 1,222
- 688
As I said before, new things were added after the person who disagreed left, new explanations of certain things, among other things, before, even I found it a little vague, I have read all the chapters that Eques appears to confirm certain things.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
That doesn't give you any right to criticize others. Freshly made? LMAO those guys accounts are showing as 2-3 months old. Also You don't have to be oldest account holder to be smart.
- 140
- 59
Do alt votes count? If not I think it’s important to figure out if they are alts. If they do…
- 43
- 26
You think too far by saying I exist the same entity as @Dog3352 . . . anyway i just issued my opinion, you can ignore it, i'm also don't care.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
Again you don't have to care about them. Wiki would have blocked them already if they are alts only one account is allowed for one users. So let us stop with derailing. Yeah their vote counts.
- 140
- 59
- 140
- 59
Ok, you right. Wasn’t straight to anos hate. Mb
- 1,222
- 688
Yes, I am an entity, more specifically a being from another dimension that despite not being of an advanced age, has a huge back pain.
- 529
- 147
Disagreed with plot manipulation via glass reason above.
- 140
- 59
More specific so I don’t have to read his 45 paragraphs at 1 am please? If not ok.
- 1,222
- 688
Via what?
- 1,222
- 688
This sounds good, besides, I'm too tired right now to look for a specific comment among several others, it's 5 am and I haven't slept at all, my back is in massive pain, and to top it off, I have insomnia .
- 140
- 59
Yeah, and before anyone asks why I didn’t ask for agree’s reasoning, it’s because I understand why people would agree, I don’t understand where the disagreement comes from.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
Can you link the comment where he actually refuted ?
- 140
- 59
We don’t need to spam them
if they were coming back they prob would’ve by now.
Lugh_Tuathe_Dé
He/Him- 3,706
- 2,074
Yea just go read back above they don't need to fetch the exact comment for you. Tbh it would be easier to find if the thread didn't got spammed by message every minutes
- 1,222
- 688
I swear if he sends a comment from him saying something like: "Plot has multiple meanings"
- 140
- 59
You see I would, but I don’t wanna and it doesn’t benefit me. Which is why I said “if not ok.”
- 1,222
- 688
Well, if he disagrees "via such a comment" he should at least know where the comment is, even if he really wasn't obliged to paste the comment, making people reread all this until they find a refutation that isn't "plot has several meanings "...it would take a while.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
I am still waiting for you to show me where they actually pointed out order = fate in my scans.
- 1,222
- 688
The order of the Chief God? Or all orders? Eques is mentioned with various titles he gave himself, but God of Fate is certainly not one of them.
Lugh_Tuathe_Dé
He/Him- 3,706
- 2,074
If you're talking about they literally, like literally said the statement "Order=Fate" there isn't, and i meant different by "he's using your own scans against". But imma leave this thread looking how the verse supporters act good luck on getting an admin give input to this.
- 1,222
- 688
Well, I don't remember Eldemade cursing anyone, and he wasn't angry because they disagreed with him, but because they spammed 2-3 pages of the same aegument that were refuted with by me, him, Fixxed and Tatsumi several times. And thank you for wishing us good luck, in case you were sincere.
Last edited:
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
I don't remember cursing anyone. I was just asking you to show me proof for glassman actual refute which you claimed.
Anyway if you feel like offended sorry for that.
Last edited:
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 8,909
- 5,812
I can remember you trying to rush things along in the 2-A thread based on 2 staffs agreement, so why don't you try to rush things along this time too based on 2 staffs disagreeing with you? Or it does not apply in this case?
Everything and firestorm disagreed, you have 2 staff votes and so many more normal users, it is enough to pass CRT.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
- We are the verse supporters we can wait for other staffs to give their input. Don't see why need to close it when literary nothing is concluded
- Don't bring Last thread argument where only you disgreed there. Here half agrees and half disgreed both are not same.
- Also Everything himself states our POV isn't wrong
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 8,909
- 5,812
Like I said same logic like you did, staff disagrees the thread should be closed and changes staff agrees to can be applied.
So non verse supporters don't deserve for staff to give input in a thread they think is iffy??
On this one 14 disagrees and 2 staffs while 6-7 agrees
Your pov isn't wrong and he also disagrees anyways.
Anyway this is derailing, I just needed to call you out on such shady behaviour so next time whether someone agrees or disagrees with you, you calm down and wait for them to table their arguments and call for further input and not try to rush things along needlessly
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 14,910
- 10,809
Go read the old thread. You kept circling the same thing. That and this has nothing to do with it.
Why do you try to recount the votes 6-7 really? Him disagreeing is based on his own preferences so technically he is not saying our POV is wrong. So we can still continue unlike other thread where no one except you disgreed.
No LMAO. Go back to previous thread where atleast 20-25 people + 3-4 staffs agreed and one neutral and only disgreed was you. Don't try to link both. Here only shady behaviour I see is you trying to implement different threads logic together where one has half agree and half disagree and other had 99% agreeing and one disagree that's you.
Most of the people who disagreed here don't even have an actual refute. Don't try to brush off the previous thread to this.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
