For yall do you care your favorite verses is "accurate" in scaling or as strong as possible wanked etc. I notice some people act like other people dislike/hate a verse if they try to downgrade verse/charcter. To me I rather the verses I like be more "accurate" In our indexing if we can. Don't see why if you like a verse you'd want it wanked, but that seems to be the case for alot of people.
Accurate. Being more powerful just changes who you can involve in which versus threads.
& if you care about who they can solo in theoretical discussions you're not having, or how impressed by their power visitors to the profile may be, firstly, you're banking on outsiders not just being dismissive or disagreeable about it & second, if you never encounter those outsiders, what does it matter what they think?
If you love your 'verse, document as much as possible, & ensure you account for what's most reasonable while helping bring to light what your profile has. Show what makes it what it is, & perhaps you'll help others find an enthusiasm for it. But ultimately, what they think is not your primary goal, it's providing information.
What good is a reference without accuracy? If we strive to make profiles have higher power over accuracy, what good are we as a reference? I doubt we can keep credibility like that. So if not for information & passion, then for pride.
Document even weaknesses.
I kind of always cringe when I see "Weaknesses: None notable.". Flaws humanize characters, & in any consistency of tactics, there's bound to be a weakness.
Likewise, document their behaviour, even if it may impede them winning. (In theory, it could also make them more likely to win.)
The characters you index are not you. If you want them to act optimally in matches, bloodlust them, give them prior knowledge & all that stuff.
