- 624
- 471
I did not admit that. Don’t misconstrue what I said. I said that specific ACTION is what caused, why Beerus did it or any motivational factors are irrelevant, how do you not see something so obvious? And WOkay, so you admit that Beerus wouldn't have done it if Trunks didn't travel to the past.
why do you keep ignoring what Whis said
The causal chain is complete and utter headcanon that Whis dismisses entirely. Beerus’s action caused it, you’re taking that away from him by constructing headcanon that Trunk’s time traveling should be it’s cause because that’s what motivated Beerus. Whis doesn’t say “Trunks you’re a hypocrite because you caused Beerus to kill Zamasu resulting in another timeline” or anyt even remotely close. He blames Beerus and ONLY Beerus for this.Pretty simple then, Trunks time travel caused a paradox, by causing Beerus' action. The causal chain does not start with Beerus.
And the simpler argument is? I’m still waiting. Why did you ignore the questions I posed, numerous times?They all involve an equal amount of assumptions, and an equally non existent amount of evidence.