A) That the concept of speed doesn't apply to you doesn't make you superior (or inferior) to a character for which the concept of speed applies. If your speed tier allows no comparison to other speed tiers, what's the point? If it allows a comparision, you have yet to explain why. If it doesn't allow a comparison you have yet to explain why it should be different than just unknown, seeing that, just as unknown, you couldn't tell whether the character hits before or after a FTL character, for example.
B) It implies nothing as for which character would land in attack first in a thread, a problem which you just haven't addressed. If the speed tier can't answer questions of such practical use it's unsuitable. It needs to be able to establish an order of events in a fight between two characters.
I believe I already did.
A character who perceives a spacetime as a purely spatial object they can interact with at any point would still have an existence in lower dimensions, with the only difference being that they have extension on another axis from which different points in time are physically accessible.
But regardless none of that process actually applies to you if you are a being whose existence has no basis in any point in time or space to begin with
The notion of speed at all is already predicated on there being some idea of space, since you'd require some manner of "distance" to move across (Whether that be a temporal equivalent of it or not). If a character's actions ignore/bypass/whatever the idea of a direction entirely, then they cannot really be said to be operating by the notion of speed at all.
And for the matter so did Rather.
A character with 3 dimensions is still bound to the first 2 dimensions. Even if they can take "shortcuts", there is still a quantifiable speed, simply over a shorter distance. A being with "aleph7" time dimensions is still equally bound to the other aleph7 time dimensions. While you did gather a greater amount of "freedom" in how you move compared to other beings, you don't get to move without still relying on them. So a being that gets to ignore one of them completely and is faster as a result would logically get to ignore all of them just the same (not saying that a character that ignore just one dimension should be assumed to ignore an infinite amount) and be faster as a result. While characters of higher dimensions get to move "more conveniently", characters that move "beyond" time and space all together just ignore the very concept of speed all together.
You keep saying that it allows no comparision, but honestly I don't see how it does not, especially given the emphasis placed on "being unbound by/ignoring/bypassing space and time entirely." Really, all I am asking is for you to not just say that those criteria don't entail a higher level beyond Immeasurable, but also
why that is the case, to begin with. As far as I see, you haven't provided me with any reasoning.
Y'know how there are sometimes planes of existence beyond spacetimes, but they still have distinct locations? In a similar way you can have stuff beyond spacetime that still has distinct moments.
For example, let's say a writer writes some pantheon of gods beyond spacetime. Those gods fight. God A kills God B. Then, in revenge, a God C kills God A. Being beyond spacetime, there is no time passing between these events or anything. However, there is a logical order to them. The plot only makes sense if God A killing God B happened before God C kills God A.
Let's further say there is a God D, who is special. God D is dissatisfied with God B having been killed, so he uses his power to prevent God A from killing God B. So for all the other gods that event never happened. That's similar to rewriting the past in a time setting, but we have no time here. Just events in some order.
If God D now displays an analogue to the usual requirements for Immeasurable relative to that order of events (i.e. he can freely navigate to prior or future events and has reactions that can keep up with beings that do such things) then he would be Immeasurable relative to that spacetimeless layer of existence and also to a higher order than Gods A and C.
There is no actual time and much less dimensions of time involved here, but there is something equivalent in a sense of before and after.
None of this makes any sense.
For you to have events occuring within an order, you, by definition, require notions of time. If there are things happening in succession, then we can very much visualize that as a set and make a temporal axis out of that. So all of this just comes across as "There is something else here that behaves exactly like time, but it isn't time, trust me." Distinctions that only exist in-name shouldn't be of our concern, imo.
Moreover, if the characters in question do, in fact, exist beyond normal time, then it is not obvious that their actions take place in some linear or successive order (This is not something that is necessarily true even of a character with Type 4 Acausality, after all), and it just naturally follows from the nature of such statements that what we see may very well just be there for the viewer's sake. If you insist that those things are actually happening exactly as is showcased/stated (Which I very much doubt applies to most cases, anyway), though, then it can easily be taken to mean that the characters existing on a level apart from the normal timeline of the verse, but not from space and time as a whole, especially in your hypothetical, where what is effectively just time travel is involved.
Same thing applies to space, since if there is no distance between two points, then they are not distinguishable from each other; they're the same point. As such, if there is literal, physical separation between two locations, then it stands to reason that they occupy some form of space (Even if not the conventional one we experience). There are other ways in which they could be distinguished from one another, like their own properties, for instance, which may be mutually exclusive, but none of those directly involve space, time and ideas that hinge on those two (i.e position or location)
So, yeah, I really do not get your point here.
Is that acceptable to you?
Sorry, but no. It is hardly even a compromise, in fact, and I am sure at least DontTalk recognizes as much.