I already said this has no bearing on my argument. You keep repeating it over again, but whether they were still in the process of becoming the new God of creation literally doesn’t matter.
They were still killed by time hax, meaning they aren’t immune to all power like Lucifer claimed they were.
It wasn't time had that killed them if you understand what happened. It was the spell that did. Here is what happened:
When the Titans usurp Yahweh's space to fill and take his powers they needed the humans to believe they were “Yahweh.” When the Titans were tricked by Lucifer,
they decided to use Beatrice because she has memories of Lucifer and they used their “power and will” to create Duinum.
This is why Mazikeen came up with a spell using her blood but cause it was her key ingredient to creating the failed copy.
It undid what affected her and since they expressed their power it would undo them. The power they had killed them not whatever time had you thought it did.
Why?
Remember Lucifer states their immune to everything but their power. By using Beatrice as a conduit, it was their own power that undid them which affect them since they gain power. Then
Lucifer killed them at that time before they gain the power to transcend time. Lucifer killed the Titans before they had any power, so it doesn't contradict anything. Also, Lucifer's statement came after Michael questioned how they were immune to the Demiurgic Power.
I hope this explains what actually happens, Xearsey.
Once again, what you’re saying here doesn’t affect what I’m arguing. I don’t care about why they aren’t eternal or why they weren’t fully the new God of creation.
It does because you claim it was “time hax” which it wasn't.
You were initially arguing for invulnerability which on this site is treated as an immunity to conventional attacks. Something that can’t be possible since the Giants were hurt by a sword.
The sword did the damage, not Lucifer. Not to mention it's never been started they fully became Yahweh because they needed to
learn tricks like Omnipresence and transcend time.
However, what's more, important is the Titans are physical being. Lucifer Will can't affect them but it can hurt their body which was physical.
Lucifer is made of
Flame and
Will. His essence is made of those to the point
he bleeds willpower. So when his “physical body” was burned to ashes it had no intended effect on his being. The only thing that held him back is his own word/will which was the magic hidden in the feather holding him back.
Ibriel states angels are like flames, they kindle everlasting because they are the
essence without shape.
Ibriel physical body can be harmed but ultimately he might have only gone into the
Mansions of Silence. Which isn't an afterlife per se, so he's not technically dead.
Also, note how
Lilith managed to hit Yahweh, and she as well as Yahweh felt it. This is because that form is taking damage, not Yahweh. When physical flesh, they can only be harmed through the flesh. This also comes in with power and will. What Lilith did had nothing to do with power but will. She “will” herself to hit Yahweh and the will of her action affected Yahweh, however, that's not power and only hit his fleshed body.
Like how a sword harmed Lucifer's physical body.
Like Lucifer said
what is might without will expect the Titans had both and
they “willed” him not to move.
If you’re arguing for immunity, you’d need to specify to what type of abilities or hax the Presence is immune to. A simple statement like “I’m immune to all power” aren’t taken literally here as that could give you immunity to every ability on the wiki, which would need much more evidence than just an “immune to all power” statement.
There's clear evidence with context and I mention above and you want “scans.” So please save the regressed idea that statement had meant nothing to you.
I don’t think the description of infinite was being used in the same manner because if the Presence was infinite like the Void he wouldn’t be constantly depicted as a smaller thing contained inside of it. And as I said before, the comic describes the Void as outside of the Presences domain, and the Presence himself literally says that Lucifer escaped his function when Lucifer met him in the Void. That’s 3 pieces of evidence against what you’re claiming
Except like you mentioned they were addressing they are the same. Yahweh is the form that was shaped, so when receiving infinite to his form would refer to power. That's why he says it after Lucifer told him the story meant he held all the keys.
The Void isn't physical, so the word is describing size hence why the next quotation is describing nothing that can fill it. The usage of the words would have less irony had the story not been told and if Yahweh decide not to dress up in that body. Jesus manifested as flesh and was around average size yet his “God.”
The only thing left is the Buddha analogy about the Presence being in control of everyone. However that doesn’t support your claim of Void = Presence either because in the analogy, the Presence who is supposed to be the Buddha, was only shown having influence across all the worlds of creation and the Void is beyond creation entirely. Which aligns with all the evidence I mentioned.
That wasn't being in control that was with context when Lucifer mentions it. It was talking about how nowhere could he go or do anything without God driving influence.
Flying across all the worlds to the edge of infinity. Look at the wording as well across all the worlds
until he reached the other side of infinity which was said to be the Void. Replace the wording and look what you get:
“--Across all the worlds until he landed on the other side of Void.”
If you replace Infinity with the Void it makes the sentence the same. What's beyond the worlds? Obviously the Void
Where after he finishes his deed jumps back to Creation. He also tells Buddha, if he could leap as far as he did to a place
where the worlds end. The Void is where the worlds end, ironic to Lucifer because he imprinted his Will in the Void to make his Creation yet it did nothing as for Monkey King to Buddha.
The Void separates Creation by distance, not time. So he leaped into the Void the structure where all Creation is held. This is a metaphor to Lucifer creating the Universe in the Void, to test if it were to free him of God’s influence. Which was the point of the Monkey King going to the other side of Infinity(Void).
That’s because he was repeating a random belief/myth held by the Monks of Klaa from Sandman Overture. However there’s no proof that usage of “void” and “God” is referring to the same things in Mike Carey’s 2000 Lucifer run. Which I don’t believe they are, as the word void in the comic is
consistently equated with the empty space of the universe. There’s also no proof that this belief is even true.
Yahweh is God. Carey and Gaiman's works intertwined. This God that's not taking shape like Yahweh was. It's his work so unless it was changed then it applies to the San man Universe which Lucifer series is part of. The Void has always been empty well the whole thing, not a portion where the Heart of Eternity is.
It also mentioned how the Monks “know.”
The monks of Klaa knows that the Universe is a distraction in the mind of God: As God meditates, seeking to clear its mind and achieve perfect enlightenment, ideas drift across the Void.
Oh “perfect enlightenment” Isn't that something Buddha achieved? That's meant to symbolize Yahweh.
That’s not the point. You’re literally arguing semantics. Infinite is just the noun or adjective form of infinity.
Usage of words with context and setting matters. In what Universe did you believe that infinity was referring to mathematics?
Anyway, the point I was trying to make is that you can have bigger infinites. The Presence was shown to be contained in the Void as a lesser thing. Sure they’re both infinite, but the Void is a larger infinite space than him.
That's because he using flesh. His not “space” if anything his the size of a regular human who would fit 0.0000001% of the Void.
No, I want a link to the scan. Not you quoting some text. An actual link or image that supports what you’re saying.
Alright, have it your way. All links are above.
Well I don’t really agree or fully disagree yet for TD type 2, but I don’t know how I’m supposed to formulate an opinion if you’re not really providing a reason or evidence for TD type 2.
Ok I already said it with Robo. So go there for your proof.