- 8,675
- 5,560
Weekly consider this an official warning. Stop stonewalling, stop misrepresenting things by claiming people who don't agree actualy agree with you, and share scans for once in your life, please. That, or just stop.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The Long Awaited SCP Upgrade
- Thread starter WeeklyBattles
- Start date
-
- Tags
- scp foundation
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #282
The scans. Are in. The OP. Im not stonewalling. People are discussing things that are not part of this revision and are basing their arguments and disagreements off of those things. Read the thread please.
- 8,675
- 5,560
People brought in new evidence and reinterpreted what was there. Facts changed.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #284
The problem is the new evidence has nothing to do with the revision at hand. This revision is about the structure of the Yeaod multiverse, while the stuff about 4555 and the Noosphere are explicitly stated to exist OUTSIDE of Yesod
- 4,299
- 2,800
Can we please stop misinterpreting what I said on Noosphere, and bringing it up. The way I said it was to counter a single point weekly made on low 1-C on the current articles, it has no general significance.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #287
I havent been talking about the Low 1-C stuff on the profiles though
- 4,299
- 2,800
Again, it's irrelevant, let's end it here.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #289
That's referring to the 2-A stuff on the profiles that would now qualify as Low 1-C due to the standard change
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #291
Uncountably infinite multiverses that contain uncountably infinite universes is now Low 1-C according to Ultime. This is the structure of the Yesod Multiverse
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,541
- 13,780
So, again, you're going back to the one Ad Astra statement, which was only accepted at likely Low 1-C.
Or maybe the 4555 statement as well, which you keep saying that you're not using.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #293
No, I'm going to the numerous quotes of Yesod containing that many universes and multiverses
4555 is not part of this revision, hence why it was removed from the op
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,541
- 13,780
Please point towards the "numerous quotes" of Yesod containing uncountably infinitely many multiverses that contain uncountably infinitely many universes. Or even just one or the other. Since you only have one quote like this in the OP, and the quotes on the profiles only mention "infinitely" many, without the uncountable part.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #295
I already have, multiple times. Getting real tired of people just straight up ignoring my posts out of personal bias against me and making me do things over and over ad infinitum because they refuse to believe that I could possibly be correct
- 4,299
- 2,800
Please, repost your scans. Nothing wrong can come of it, so why not?
- 383
- 218
You’re staff and you’ve been stonewalling for a whole hour. Why are you making this so difficult? I don’t understand why you can’t listen to people.
- 10,688
- 4,810
Can we just close this? Everyone but weekly has agreed on At least 2-A, likely Low 1-C
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #299
Ah yes I've been stonewalling my own thread that I spent a year making, makes total sense. It's impossible for the other party to be wrong or to be using points that are irrelevant to the discussion to argue against it, it must be me that's wrong.
Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,541
- 13,780
...So you're not gonna post those other quotes, or even add them to the OP? You're just gonna keep repeating that everyone else is wrong and that you're not providing evidence because they'll ignore it anyway?
- 16,208
- 10,696
I agree with at least 2-A, likely Low 1-C
- 15,436
- 7,857
At least 2-A, likely Low 1-C also looks good to me, for the record.
And can everyone calm the hell down. I don't care who's fault it is, all I'm seeing is a giant circle of "no you're stone walling" and it's frankly childish. A good chunk of you are staff. You should be better than this.
@DaReaperMan You have a bad habit of making arguments worse. Stop egging people on.
And can everyone calm the hell down. I don't care who's fault it is, all I'm seeing is a giant circle of "no you're stone walling" and it's frankly childish. A good chunk of you are staff. You should be better than this.
@DaReaperMan You have a bad habit of making arguments worse. Stop egging people on.
- 42,677
- 36,931
Kay
- 42,677
- 36,931
Anyways when will 1440 be updated?
- 4,466
- 378
I think so
- 42,677
- 36,931
I meant 1440 is outdated to hell and back from memory
Lou_change
He/Him- 10,138
- 5,389
Do you mind explaining futher.
- 42,677
- 36,931
I remember Weekly consistently saying that 1440 is outdated badly
Lou_change
He/Him- 10,138
- 5,389
Other than it seemingly not understanding extended canon it seems fine.
- 4,299
- 2,800
After this revision (which will make 682 even harder to kill then it already is, so more incons for the incon god), we'll have a 682 hax addition and revision thread.
- 42,677
- 36,931
Yay!
- 4,299
- 2,800
There is a pretty big 682 revision going on right now, including some other additions. If anybody would wish to look over, it's right here.
- 42,677
- 36,931
question: why the FETH is HDE not on The Brothers Death's profile?
- 15,637
- 5,392
I agree with Ovens.
- 4,466
- 378
bump
Gewsbumpz_dude
Username Only- 3,643
- 881
I agree with at least 2-A, likely Low 1-C
- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #317
I will not be applying this myself. I will not be replying to this thread again. Apply this thread as you se fit.
- 4,466
- 378
So At Least 2-A, likely Low 1-C possibly higher is accepted right?
if yes changes are applicable
if yes changes are applicable
- 4,466
- 378
bump
- 16,026
- 9,270
I implore everyone to please be patient as I adjust all the pages. It really isn't helping when you edit a small part of a page and leave it as such. If you really want to help make sure you are familiar with editing pages and applying CRTs to pages.
Similar threads
