- 4,466
- 378
Due to ad astra?Ovens was arguing for it to be 2-A because he didnt think that 4555 scaled to the Yesod multiverse even though Yesod would still be Low 1-C without using 4555 as a feat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to ad astra?Ovens was arguing for it to be 2-A because he didnt think that 4555 scaled to the Yesod multiverse even though Yesod would still be Low 1-C without using 4555 as a feat
Due to Ad Astra and the other statements of Yesod containing uncountably infinite multiverss with uncountably infinite universes in themDue to ad astra?
For Azathoth's mothers sake man....Can someone post the uncountably infinite universes scan?
i suppose that come from "Existential Planes 1 to 2 through ℵ0 and onwards", right?Due to Ad Astra and the other statements of Yesod containing uncountably infinite multiverss with uncountably infinite universes in them
"Post the scans!"For helvetes sake would you just post the wolfin scans weekly?
I've yet to see such a scan on this thread. Once more, can you please post it?"Post the scans!"
'Posts scans'
"Post the scans!"
'post scans again'
"You havent posted the scan!!!!!"
...
I've yet to see such a scan on this thread. Once more, can you please post it?
They're at the start of the thread.For Azathoth's mothers sake man....
Please post it. I can't help but feel like this weekly guy is giving staff an awful lookI've yet to see such a scan on this thread. Once more, can you please post it?
Arrogance hurts his reputation.Please post it. I can't help but feel like this weekly guy is giving staff an awful look
Then I remain steadfast on 2-A likely Low 1-C, possibly HigherThey're at the start of the thread.
The Ad Astra one isn't definitively Low 1-C, which Ultima agreed with, and the 4555 one has dodgy scaling to the tree, which Ultima doesn't feel qualified to discuss.
It's literally the same scans that Weekly put under a "likely" at the start of the thread, but now that there's no temporal dimensions shenanigans and it might stay at 2-A, he feels the need to switch over for literally no reason.
Wait, is the "uncountably infinite universes" statement the SCP 4555 one????They're at the start of the thread.
The Ad Astra one isn't definitively Low 1-C, which Ultima agreed with, and the 4555 one has dodgy scaling to the tree, which Ultima doesn't feel qualified to discuss.
It's literally the same scans that Weekly put under a "likely" at the start of the thread, but now that there's no temporal dimensions shenanigans and it might stay at 2-A, he feels the need to switch over for literally no reason.
well Ad Astra have higher dimensional worlds stuff contained in whatever.They're at the start of the thread.
The Ad Astra one isn't definitively Low 1-C, which Ultima agreed with, and the 4555 one has dodgy scaling to the tree, which Ultima doesn't feel qualified to discuss.
It's literally the same scans that Weekly put under a "likely" at the start of the thread, but now that there's no temporal dimensions shenanigans and it might stay at 2-A, he feels the need to switch over for literally no reason.
No, thats not bing used hereWait, is the "uncountably infinite universes" statement the SCP 4555 one????
Well then there's just Ad Astra, which Ultima and I evaluated as only likely Low 1-C. :LNo, thats not bing used here
Then what in the 18 layers of hell is "uncountably infinite universes" in the OP if not that?No, thats not bing used here
The stuf on the profiles that was already agreed on as being legitThen what in the 18 layers of hell is "uncountably infinite universes" in the OP if not that?
We're going in circles now. If nothing on this thread is a scan then please post it here. Right now. No "but it's already on the profile!" stuff.The stuf on the profiles that was already agreed on as being legit
Weekly made the same defense to you over a hundred posts ago and never supplied anything. Good luck getting anything out of him this time.We're going in circles now. If nothing on this thread is a scan then please post it here. Right now. No "but it's already on the profile!" stuff.
I thought staff were here to supply accurate statistics? WTF is this???Weekly made the same defense to you over a hundred posts ago and never supplied anything. Good luck getting anything out of him this time.
Also Agnaa, sorry if I might be derailing but what happened to the note on the tiering system page about multiple sets of infinite universes not being above baseline by default? It seems to have been removed so I wonder if that no longer applies.Weekly made the same defense to you over a hundred posts ago and never supplied anything. Good luck getting anything out of him this time.
I'm not sure what happened to it but I'm 99% sure it still applies. I'll go investigate.Also Agnaa, sorry if I might be derailing but what happened to the note on the tiering system page about multiple sets of infinite universes not being above baseline by default? It seems to have been removed so I wonder if that no longer applies.
Dealing with WeeklyBattles is what this is.I thought staff were here to supply accurate statistics? WTF is this???
It got moved to the Tiering System FAQ page, and still applies.Also Agnaa, sorry if I might be derailing but what happened to the note on the tiering system page about multiple sets of infinite universes not being above baseline by default? It seems to have been removed so I wonder if that no longer applies.
This is accurate. Thus far the couterarguments to this revision are:I thought staff were here to supply accurate statistics? WTF is this???
Noosphere isnt part of this either,the 5-D stuff comes from Ad AstraThat was directed against you, Weekly.
The low 1-C justification is 5-D noosphere shenanigans, not whatever the Low 1-C Yesod statements you apparently have are.
I would implore you to read the previous statements on Ad Astra.Noosphere isnt part of this either,the 5-D stuff comes from Ad Astra
I have. The noosphere isnt part of thisI would implore you to read the previous statements on Ad Astra.
I was saying the low 1-C on the profiles varied far from your the supposed low 1-C justifications, and I haven't brought it up since. And for your first part, then you should know that it was evaluated as likely Low 1-C by Ultima and Agnaa.I have. The noosphere isnt part of this
Cool, still not a part of this so please stop derailingI was saying the low 1-C on the profiles varied far from your the supposed low 1-C justifications, and I haven't brought it up since. And for your first part, then you should know that it was evaluated as likely Low 1-C by Ultima and Agnaa.
Your insistence on 5D noosphere not being apart of this thread, when I myself stated I agreed and only stated it to check what you said was true earlier in the thread. Please do not bring it up again unless you would like to reference your past statement. Also, that was not the point of my comment, don't dodge my intention and discredit it by calling it derailing, when you have referenced more than me at this point.Cool, still not a part of this so please stop derailing
Dude. The Noosphere is not part of Yesod. This thread is solely about Yesod's structure, hence why its not part of it just like 4555 isnt part of it.Stop. Bringing. It. Up. If. It. Is. Not. Apart. Of. The. Thread.
This is hypocrisy Weekly, and anyway, still was not the bulk of my arguement.
I get this. I do not bring it up. Please do not misinterpret my point on Noosphere when I have been clear on what it was. And if you bring it up and say it's derailing, and then continue to bring it up, it's hypocritical.Dude. The Noosphere is not part of Yesod. This thread is solely about Yesod's structure, hence why its not part of it just like 4555 isnt part of it.