• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The lightning dodging feats page

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
He/Him
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
165,198
72,164
Hello.

Based on the discussion in this thread, DontTalk has suggested that we should rewrite the "Scientific basis"-section of the Lightning Dodging Feats page in the following manner:

Scientific basis
The speed of lightning can vary mostly in the range of 1.0-14×105 m/s. For the purpose of calculating speed feats we use the average lightning speed of 4.4×105 m/s, which is suggested by this study. Similar studies have found average speeds within the same order of magnitude, albeit lower. [1][2][3]

The clouds that usually cause thunderstorms build about 200m to 4000m above the ground.[4] In this wiki, 2000m is the standard assumption.

  1. Ôåæ http://es.vaisala.com/Vaisala Documents/Scientific papers/2.Campos, Saba, Warner.pdf
  2. Ôåæ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdo...6B89E01?doi=10.1.1.589.8160&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  3. Ôåæ https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1412/1412.3537.pdf
  4. Ôåæ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulonimbus_cloud#Appearance
With the reference list in the reference section at the bottom of the page.

What do the rest of you think about this?

NOTE: STAFF ONLY
 
That looks much cleaner. It would help aspiring calcers who haven't done lightning dodges a lot as well as making it easier for anyone to effectively cite sources if someone is sceptical.
 
Assaltwaffle said:
That looks much cleaner. It would help aspiring calcers who haven't done lightning dodges a lot as well as making it easier for anyone to effectively cite sources if someone is sceptical.
This.
 
Thank you for the feedback.
 
Okay. Thanks. I suppose that it should probably be fine to update the section then.
 
I have now done so.
 
Back
Top