• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

Status
Not open for further replies.
DC goes for DeMatteis’ Gods, such as The Divine Presence & The Smile (The Smile I don’t have recollection of but I know The Divine Presence because I read Matteis’ Spectre comics)

Seeker and The Mystery’s (Which isn’t related to DC) The Magician would get 0 from it. It’s literally DeMatteis’ interpretation of God in fictional form

I still say we should separate The Divine Creator from TOAA for the reasons I mentioned earlier. They retconned a lot of the main stuff from DeMatteis’ stories so it’s dubious to assume The Divine Creator interpretation stayed for TOAA. If we separate that, The Divine Creator should get 0 due to the statement from Matteis that every fictional depiction of God / The Creator he made are the same entity.
The Smile isn't a separate profile and is the same as the Divine Presence.
 
even if chinese SCP isn't translated it's still recognized by placeholder as being its own patasphere and i can tell you for sure if we used chinese SCP it sure is getting erased off the wiki for this one which is made by this guy https://scp-wiki-cn.wikidot.com/scp-vs-battle
"Gods Beyond Absolute Infinity"? Surely this article is a well-written work of art and not at all loaded with VS-
image.png

Ah.
 
Since the margin is 8 in favor and only 2-3 against (not sure what the deal with Agnaa is), are we just waiting for Ant to come back from vacation right now?

Of course any other admin votes would still be welcome.
 
Since the margin is 8 in favor and only 2-3 against (not sure what the deal with Agnaa is), are we just waiting for Ant to come back from vacation right now?
I've personally informed Ant about the thread's near-conclusion. Given he has been popping into existence every then and again for the past few days, it's a matter of time before he sees it.
 
I've personally informed Ant about the thread's near-conclusion. Given he has been popping into existence every then and again for the past few days, it's a matter of time before he sees it.
He's currently taking a vacation outside existence thus he has R>F over us. Occasionally, he does send his emanation to send the message.
 
I've personally informed Ant about the thread's near-conclusion. Given he has been popping into existence every then and again for the past few days, it's a matter of time before he sees it.
Ultima, can you take a little peek at this cosmology?


Will it become tier 0?
 
From what I can see, Chinese SCP actually is guilty of the kind of battleboarding-esque writing the main branch is often wrongly accused of using, so I'd be against allowing it.
 
Since the margin is 8 in favor and only 2-3 against (not sure what the deal with Agnaa is), are we just waiting for Ant to come back from vacation right now?

Of course any other admin votes would still be welcome.
My post was pretty clear; my vote's for, whether Idiosyncratic wishes to list it accurately or not.
From what I can see, Chinese SCP actually is guilty of the kind of battleboarding-esque writing the main branch is often wrongly accused of using, so I'd be against allowing it.
I'd like that decision to be made a bit more rigorously. To make sure that it isn't done by some selective quoting of articles that could also be done against the English branch, to similar effect.
 
I've personally informed Ant about the thread's near-conclusion. Given he has been popping into existence every then and again for the past few days, it's a matter of time before he sees it.
And would his thoughts on the matter conclude the thread?
 
Ah Ultima, I found the original question about that infinite regression thing I was babbling about:

Post in thread 'The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"'
https://vsbattles.com/threads/the-c...ces-of-the-tiering-system.159822/post-6308227

Post in thread 'The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"'
https://vsbattles.com/threads/the-c...ces-of-the-tiering-system.159822/post-6318507

Not sure if this’ll help much, but it’s worth a shot. Even through text, my communication be ass sometimes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top