It would be an anti-feat, still Real Energy, no one other than the Real Being or others like them should be able to transfer that energy around. Unless the Real Being gave the Fictional Being the ability to transfer Real Energy.
They weren't asking you.
Not what I meant.
Same tbh
Goku get slammed by the OG Goku.
vsbattles.fandom.com
goku gokuverse lvl >>>> boundless fodderGoku get slammed by the OG Goku.
Sun Wukong (Journey to the West)
Sun Wukong was born from a magical stone formed from chaos. Upon hatching into the world he lived most of his life on The Mountain of Flowers and Fruit. There he joined and lived with a large group of monkeys eventually discovering a secret cave that the monkeys could use as their new home. The...
And with Ultima revision, his last key is tier 0.
Cry with it.
Which Buddha?
Buddha across fiction can vary. I'm referring to how we're using things like Monad and Buddha in views from a section of Buddhism such as Mahāsāṃghika or Theravada vision of the Buddha as a Supreme entity that was human to gain the ultimate reality or Nirvana which in his “Perfect Enlightenment” became all that is by transcending desire by becoming non non-existence.
Don't feel bad I almost did the same lmaoDamn, my sleepy brain commented on the staff thread without knowing
But that reminds me: What margin of votes from the admins/bureaucrats (aka the only legit votes) would be enough to conclude the thread?
There's no official policy. In theory any majority could pass a revision. In practice it will likely require something more convincing.
Don't you mean 4-3? Only Admin and up counts for these sorts of threads.
It is a good question though. For CRTs do simple majoritys pass? i.e. 4-3 or 5-4.
Please be careful with these sorts of answers. It is a vibe-based thing, but when things are only a few votes off, that usually forces both to come to a compromise.
This is true, but it's very situation dependent. In many cases there's no possible compromise.
For me it depends on the amount of total votes. For instance, I would consider a 3-1 thread successful, but maybe not 8-6.
I think you're confusing too many things here.
Nirvana and Buddhahood in some takes is the Ultimate Reality not to be confused with Brahman because Buddhism takes inspiration from Hinduism as well. I was not at all eluding to Ultimate Reality as Brahman just because the idea originates from Hinduism.
As I said, in some views although not too many. Some do view him as supreme whether as a person or a transcendent being. Sources vary and there are no absolutes though in most cases he is just a human.
This is Universal across different interpretations of Buddhism? I know what Enlightenment is and the notion of Self is not exactly the same across multiple takes on Buddhism.
That's is the jist that I was getting.
Exactly. Religion shouldn't be considered absolute by views because different moral ethics change and bend certain things.
Shouldn't Ant's vote be included?
He'll need to explicitly say so for us to count it.
We're requiring re-votes after the summaries, since I wasn't allowed to present my arguments earlier on in the thread.
The source for Nirvana being the Ultimate reality is from a book called "Buddhism" by Peter Harvey, a famous Scholar on Buddhism and a professor of it, but not from any Sutras. More so, they're taking his assigning of Nirvana being the Ultimate reality as being.
It is a very interesting read, but the entire book is over 500 pages long, only that it covers more than Theravada Buddhism so I plan to give it a good read, though from what I read, it's good.
Doesn't really fit.
Kinda true. It depends on where you look, and by this I mean, in certain traditions people venerate Buddha (and other Buddhas) as transcendent beings within Samsara, but they're all ultimately equals in actuality.
Yeah, the Pali canon (the source for this) is explicitly canonical to all Buddhist canons. The Great Scripture Store (Chinese canon) and the Buddhavacana (Tibetan canon) have the Pali canon within them.
Yeah, that's good then. I was more so just clarifying on the position of "Ultimate Reality" since Brahman is that and Buddhists specifically argued against Brahman.
Yeah, the point I was also trying to make is something equivalent in nature. Perhaps considering it as some sort of “Ultimate Reality” does make it shaky but I believe the idea was there.
