- 520
- 350
Scans are here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Scans are here.
Leave them be. I can't be assed to answer until an actually cohesive SCP removal thread is made.
NoTIER 0 BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY CONFIRMED?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Scans are here.
me when pop culture references with little to no relevance on the story makes a work fanfiction or copyright infringement
No way you just equated Skibidi toilet to "pop culture references with little to no relevance on the story".
Oops sorry, I read the sentence wrongly. I thought it was "pop culture references with little to no relevance to the story"No way you just equated Skibidi toilet to "pop culture references with little to no relevance on the story".
So in conclusion, the sky is blue and water is wet.
What does that translate to?So in conclusion, the sky is blue and water is wet.
Pretty sure that means 'it's obvious' or some equivalent.What does that translate to?
But what is?Pretty sure that means 'it's obvious' or some equivalent.
I think manifoldThen who lost their 1A to 0 ???
just little example
are you talking about the verse or the actual manifold, it caps out at 1-A+Isn't Manifold only High 1B rn?
Goddess of Midfold.Oh, I thought that The Goddess of Manifold got downgraded. Yeah, the verse might get downgraded if Ultima's thread passes.
No, DT and Agnaa have both presented strong objections, and Ultima hasn't had the time to address them due to being overwhelmed with exams.Did Ultima's proposal pass yet?
What I mean by "strong objections" is "strong disagreement," and DT in particular holds far too much authority as a bureaucrat to be overruled merely by being outvoted."Strong objections" is a bit funny.
DT has been clobbered multiple times now, and Agnaa's post was pretty low-effort imo.
antvasima thought ultimas proposal seemed fine, so it evens out. (probably). best case scenario this gets stonewalled for another 6 months and applied after thatWhat I mean by "strong objections" is "strong disagreement," and DT in particular holds far too much authority as a bureaucrat to be overruled merely by being outvoted.
Bureaucrats are not permitted to cancel each other's vetoes.antvasima thought ultimas proposal seemed fine, so it evens out. (probably). best case scenario this gets stonewalled for another 6 months and applied after that
He has been outvoted and overruled by a liege of staff members before.What I mean by "strong objections" is "strong disagreement," and DT in particular holds far too much authority as a bureaucrat to be overruled merely by being outvoted.
The veto only applies to wiki policy revisions, not verse upgrades, so DT couldn't have vetoed that, anyhow. The only time I know that DT's vote on a staff thread was overruled was when Fuji changed Transduality to Nonduality, and in that case, it was only because he refused to respond to defend himself for months on end, which definitely won't happen here.He has been outvoted and overruled by a liege of staff members before.
Big example being the infamous SCP Foundation upgrade. He was the only one who opposed it out of a huge group of staff, and so it was concluded that he simply couldn't hold back the entire upgrade by himself.
The veto only applies to wiki policy revisions, not verse upgrades, so DT couldn't have vetoed that, anyhow. The only time I know that DT's vote on a staff thread was overruled was when Fuji changed Transduality to Nonduality, and in that case, it was only because he refused to respond to defend himself for months on end, which definitely won't happen here.
As I said, that isn't even a staff thread.THAT SCP Revision (Yes, it's High 1-A)
Well if he is busy he doesn't need to make a complete response. He can at least just come and tell whether he will make another response later or not.vsbattles.com
The amount of verses we have that use actual cardinality as a way to get to 1-A instead of metaphysical transcendence is countable on two hands. Shoving all of them into High 1-B+ is eminently reasonable, and an entire tier section for them is utterly superflous.Yo ultima, (Ik you arent really advocating for a change but still keeping op title as this because i mean what did you think would happen)
So overall I think all points made are great, however an issue that I am having is where you would rank further hierarchical dimensions as weve currently defined them
So from what ive seen, it seems you are proposing a tier below 11c to account for qualitatively inferior layers, and that 1A and above would change from talk of higher infinity dimensions to qualitatively superior layers, and that all higher infinity dimensions would be a sort of "high 1b+.
However i dont think that what effectively acts as all of low 1a, 1a, high 1a, and 0 currently to be shoved into high 1b+. What i think should happen is these sorts of higher levels of infinities with regards to dimensions and such, like inaccessible as described with high 1a (and basically the whole range of either high 1b through 0 or low 1a through 0) to be its own tier.
I think that this topic has been delved into quite heavily in many fictional verses as we see with the many characters in this tiering range (even though many characters should be in different spots due to the issues you mentioned in your post. Not all of them change).
So i basically think there should be 14 tier ranges instead of the 12 now. A range below 11 as you said, all of the current ones, transfinite dimensional tier range (which is what the current low 1a to 0 is), and then the qualitatively superior range above this that you refer to in your post. Then 0 of course. Or maybe not its own entire section but you get the gist
Thoughts on this?
And? That was big enough to be a staff thread, it simply wasn't. There isn't much of a difference anyway, since threads regardless require staff input to be passed.As I said, that isn't even a staff thread.
Bureaucrats are only allowed to veto staff threads about wiki policy, not merely big, controversial CRTs that were placed in the staff forum to better moderate them.And? That was big enough to be a staff thread, it simply wasn't. There isn't much of a difference anyway, since threads regardless require staff input to be passed.
A Bureaucrat (at the time) confirming that DT can't just wall a verse revision means that likely applies to any thread. As it SHOULD.
It would be incredibly bad standard if DT's position allows him to halt whatever he doesn't agree with on his own.