Sword Art Online CRT: More Additions To The Entire Verse

[DMUA]

DMUA disagree with Unconventional Resistance

I disagree with 99% of this CRT, excluding unconvential resistance to soul manipulation (But definitely not matter manipulation) after some consideration of it

I also don't really have much of a counter to Nonexistent physiology, as I can't think of really any example where it's outright contradicted or doesn't particularly make sense so

Other than that I disagree with pretty much everything here

 

[Zencha9]

We should probably remove soul manip from SAO characters due to the Fluctlights change yeah

 

[RitsuØ1]

(But definitely not matter manipulation)

Why?

 

[DMUA]

Kirito is the only one who ever actually took a hit to his Fluctlight at any point and he nearly died from it. It's no more resistance than someone getting hospitalized from a car crash is 9-B durability.

 

[RitsuØ1]

It's no more resistance than someone getting hospitalized from a car crash is 9-B durability.

Wasn't Kirito already hospitalized at the beginning of Alicization?

 

[DMUA]

Yeah but he wasn't a vegetable, a stark contrast to what happened after a single hit to his Fluctlight.

 

[AnonymousBlank]

Whats the opinions on SAO, ALO and GGO avatars getting resistance to soul manip for not having fluctlights?

 

[DMUA]

Don't they have to actively shove their Fluctlights into the game to play it, or something akin to that?

I know it's not anywhere near as immersive as Alictization and thus Incarnation isn't as effective but I think they are there

I guess you could sorta argue thus it would be more difficult to deal damage to them but also Fluctlights are quantium particles anyways and not souls in the conventional sense so eh

 

[deonment]

i say the soul manip resist looks good, but the reasoning you put in the crt is jank, the matter resistance is no, ee is no and void is good but it should also be absorption too, nep looks good, also pain tolerance is a thing so no supernatural will power unless there is other shit and i am neutral on the rest

 

[Ned_the_outer_god]

NEP should be solid

No, I already explained why Black Holes aren‘t NEP, the being nonexistent and a void part could warrant a possible, but it’s referring to Subtilizer being a black hole type thingie. But hey, I’m not as knowledgeable on SAO as I am on Black Holes

 

[RitsuØ1]

No, I already explained why Black Holes aren‘t NEP, the being nonexistent and a void part could warrant a possible, but it’s referring to Subtilizer being a black hole type thingie. But hey, I’m not as knowledgeable on SAO as I am on Black Holes

Was that the only thing you looked at? What about being described as a void and a patch of nothingness?

 

[Ned_the_outer_god]

Was that the only thing you looked at? What about being described as a void and a patch of nothingness?

I saw that, hence why I said "possible NEP". Him being a void and patch of nothingness could be quite literal or just a reference to being a black hole. Never said I disagreed though

 

[RitsuØ1]

I saw that, hence why I said "possible NEP". Him being a void and patch of nothingness could be quite literal or just a reference to being a black hole. Never said I disagreed though

I believe we already covered this saying that being described as a void of nothingness is Textbook NEP (Type 1)

 

[Ned_the_outer_god]

I believe we already covered this saying that being described as a void of nothingness is Textbook NEP (Type 1)

You didn't read what I said

Him being a void and patch of nothingness could be quite literal or just a reference to being a black hole, as Black Holes look like nothingness due to the event horizon

 

[Ned_the_outer_god]

First of all, what is with your pfp? I believe Oblivion already covered the whole NEP (Type 1) thing. Your opinion would be taken into consideration.

WHO KNOWS! Also, being a void is text book NEP, I will agree with that, but it's either referring him to being a black hole or is literal

 

[RitsuØ1]

... I forgot to make the strikethrough successfully.

 

[Cloozuma]

WHO KNOWS!

Put a JoJo pfp and lets see the reaction from Problem

 

[Zencha9]

It's literal since he was called nothingnese 2 times amd has an attack that that has void in it's name so it is pretty blatant

 

[Vietthai96]

That why i neutral on the NEP stuff, evidence is vague so a Possibly is a good result

 

[Zencha9]

That why i neutral on the NEP stuff, evidence is vague so a Possibly is a good result

Explain how is it vauge when there's 3 statements 2 saying it's nothing and one of one his attacks having void in it's name

 

[Ned_the_outer_god]

By this logic, anything with the word void is now NEP UwU

 

[Zencha9]

That's not what im saying

 

[Vietthai96]

Explain how is it vauge when there's 3 statements 2 saying it's nothing and one of one his attacks having void in it's name

Blackness also me nothing, black hole could mean nothing, we could interpreting it in many way, that mean the evidence is vague. I could also look at black hole or space and call it a void cause i don't see anything, but did it is truly void of nothingness.
The attack have name Void also doesn't mean it is truly Void, but with Kirito feat so Void Manip is fine. But have Void Manip doesn't mean it = NEP

 

[RitsuØ1]

Blackness also me nothing, black hole could mean nothing, we could interpreting it in many way, that mean the evidence is vague. I could also look at black hole or space and call it a void cause i don't see anything, but did it is truly void of nothingness.
The attack have name Void also doesn't mean it is truly Void, but with Kirito feat so Void Manip is fine. But have Void Manip doesn't mean it = NEP

You Tell Me

 

[Zencha9]

Blackness also me nothing, black hole could mean nothing, we could interpreting it in many way, that mean the evidence is vague. I could also look at black hole or space and call it a void cause i don't see anything, but did it is truly void of nothingness.
The attack have name Void also doesn't mean it is truly Void, but with Kirito feat so Void Manip is fine. But have Void Manip doesn't mean it = NEP

None of that even matters Because it's said that he's nothing
Also you keep saying it's vauge and could mean anything but you bring nothing to the table
And thus im asking you can you tell about an interpretation that isn't void nor NEP?

 

[Cloozuma]

Blackness also me nothing, black hole could mean nothing, we could interpreting it in many way, that mean the evidence is vague. I could also look at black hole or space and call it a void cause i don't see anything, but did it is truly void of nothingness.
The attack have name Void also doesn't mean it is truly Void, but with Kirito feat so Void Manip is fine. But have Void Manip doesn't mean it = NEP

Pretty much sometimes when Void and Nothing comes to play it's straightforward Void Manip and NEP.

 

[Zencha9]

Yeah there's literally no other way to interpret it otherwise

 

[Vietthai96]

Pretty much sometimes when Void and Nothing comes to play it's straightforward Void Manip and NEP.

I'm not against Void Manip, i'm justs said that sometime have Void Manip doesn't mean the user also have NEP

 

[Cloozuma]

I'm not against Void Manip, i'm justs said that sometime have Void Manip doesn't mean the user also have NEP

Which isn't the case for this one. There are words like "nothing" and "void" that would qualify for NEP.

 

[Speezenator]

Honestly I'm fine with saying "possible existence erasure" since I feel it really comes down to how you interpret the statement and I think we pretty much all agree on the void manip one.