- 22,723
- 23,348
About what? A valid alternate version is that its just thermal energy and the displacement created is from the tail moving up.I'm just saying the evidence you've given is hardly substantial.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
About what? A valid alternate version is that its just thermal energy and the displacement created is from the tail moving up.I'm just saying the evidence you've given is hardly substantial.
Which you haven't proven. And it being a "valid interpretation" is meaningless, you could say that about almost anything.About what? A valid alternate version is that its just thermal energy and the displacement created is from the tail moving up.
I'm confused by your point here. You clearly see in the top panel that the displacement comes well before the core is pulled. Its the tail moving it upwards.Look at my edit.
What?I mean in every scan orochi's tail is stationary.
It is displacement. I'm saying its from the tail rather than the energy sphere. The top part for example is far more warpped than the lower part, which wouldn't be true to my understanding if it was from the core.I'm saying it could easily be displacement.
Because if the tail doesn't move in the other scans then it can't be the reason for the displacement.I guess we have different views (well, not even really views, as such, because I don't disagree) here. I still don't really see anything substantial, but you could also say the same for it being mass.
@Quangotjokes Why does that really matter, though.
Why doesn't Orochi physically scale to it anymore? Also I thought Orochi was gonna be Low 5-B via the earthquake as wellWhen I get the free time tomorrow I guess I'll make an alternate calc and a CRT. If accepted we just go back to a modified previous rating where they're 6-A or High 6-C again rather than Low 5-B physically.
I mean, it's the thing in the first place that's absorbing the energy. So movement would be immaterial.Because if the tail doesn't move in the other scans then it can't be the reason for the displacement.
Because the feat would drop from Low 5-B to 6-A. The only reason its so high is because we're saying he moved like 2 Quintillion Metric Tons at mach 3378. If its just an energy pull both the AP and Lifting Strength would be FUBAR'ed.Why doesn't Orochi physically scale to it anymore?
?FUBAR
Yeah but there's no evidence his tail physically went to the core but speculation.I mean, it's the thing in the first place that's absorbing the energy. So movement would be immaterial.
I did use Mag 10 in the calc. People just thought it should be universal, when there's no indication it is. Building shook violently but there's no indication of damages to anything until the core started to approach the surface, but at that point the epicenter was closer to the top which is why City Z was exposed to stuff like Volcanic Eruptions or the city folding.Weren't people arguing to use magnitude 10?
ohList of military slang terms - Wikipedia
I'm not sure what that means exactly?I did use Mag 10 in the calc. People just thought it should be universal, when there's no indication it is.
I'm not arguing the calc, just don't want orochi to have an ability he doesn't have.@Quan I'm saying it doesn't matter even if it did. That wouldn't change anything.
Here's a hastily made MS paint drawingI'm not sure what that means exactly?
I still don't get it
I still don't get it![]()
To show why the Earthquakes got more intense as the core was moved and why it wouldn't be a universal Mag 8 or 10Ok. What was the point of the drawing? What are you trying to show?
Ok.To show why the Earthquakes got more intense as the core was moved and why it wouldn't be a universal Mag 8 or 10
If Orochi does end up getting downgraded, then Boros would be 6-A via being superior to Orochi, and could damage his ship. (Of course the page will be cleaner than this)So Orochi is going to High 6-C to 6-A? If that's the case, how are we gonna treat Boros' possibly rating if Orochi becomes 6-A and Orochi's 6-A is higher than Boros. Do we straight up say Boros > Orochi like what we did back when Orochi and Boros were still 6-C (We decided to straight up scale both above Geryu and Homeless) or do we write Boros as "6-A, possibly higher"?
The difference is 1.12x and Boros rather massively upscales from his 6-A feat. So he'd be vaguely higher in both forms even without scaling.If that's the case, how are we gonna treat Boros' possibly rating if Orochi becomes 6-A and Orochi's 6-A is higher than Boros.
So we can keep him > Orochi?The difference is 1.12x and Boros rather massively upscales from his 6-A feat. So he'd be vaguely higher in both forms even without scaling.
Yes.So we can keep him > Orochi?
What happened?
The volcanos were around City ZAlso, idk if this should be noted, but Orochi caused volcanoes all over the earth to erupt as a byproduct of pulling the energy from the core.
It said volcanoes all over the earth. Only the volcanoes in City Z were shown ig.The volcanos were around City Z