- 24,979
- 26,829
Those are only for VS matches7.5X for characters
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those are only for VS matches7.5X for characters
I know that but I'm asking what the normal multiplier is now, if such a thing exists. When I hear "case by case basis" I can see that being abused to get all kinds of different multipliers for any number of reasons. 7.5X is an extreme example to illustrate that possibilityThose are only for VS matches
You know, I probably would've done this if I wasn't broke as **** atmUnless someone here wanna cough up some cash so we can go buy the guidebook lol
I can't find it anywhere what the hellTbh I kinda wonder how much it costs. Lemme check
Thats exactly what I'm sayingHis rel+ feat was him getting serious, although not much to imply he was going all out or anything. I think a possibly SOL is fine, with his current rating as normal.
If that happens then it's an oof cause FF is definitely supposed to be in that range, but I guess he might just not have enough evidence to put him there.Also rel+ is boutta get recalled and downgraded so...
We should start making rules for this at this point.How many times have we gone over why Flashy Flash isn’t SoL in this thread? I feel like it’s been more than five times by now.
Because a lot of guidebooks statements for heroes are hyperbole, and the main cast don't show much feats that are even close to what the databook describesWhy doesn't flashy have possibly SOL for his speed? It was stated in the databook. You also can't say it's false, because he doesn't have any anti-feats. His speed is close enough to SOL for it not to be a stretch,
It's mainly due to the redraws having the cave be smaller iirc, which sucks.If that happens then it's an oof cause FF is definitely supposed to be in that range, but I guess he might just not have enough evidence to put him there.
Honestly, making a discussion rule for that doesn’t sound like a bad idea.We should start making rules for this at this point.
I understand that, but what I'm trying to say is, the points that I've seen to not put possible SoL for Flashy don't really make sense. Just because someone is going serious doesn't mean going all out. Saitama's serious punch isn't his 100%, so why would we put a limit on Flashy when we have something saying he is faster than he has shown. Flashy doesn't have any anti-feats to go against what the databook stated.How many times have we gone over why Flashy Flash isn’t SoL in this thread? I feel like it’s been more than five times by now.
I dunno, I'm pretty sure it wasn't intentional thoWhy tf would Murata even do that? It just makes them weaker and is a change no one really cares about.
That's not the argument that goes against him being SoL. The argument is that said statement comes from a databook that severely hypes up the Heroes mentioned in it, and that a large majority of the other statements for Heroes are all blatant hyperbole.I understand that, but what I'm trying to say is, the points that I've seen to not put possible SoL for Flashy don't really make sense. Just because someone is going serious doesn't mean going all out. Saitama's serious punch isn't his 100%, so why would we put a limit on Flashy when we have something saying he is faster than he has shown. Flashy doesn't have any anti-feats to go against what the databook stated.
I've already stated, many of the statements are hyperbole, it's likely flash is as well as he hasn't shown a feat that is close to SOLunderstand that, but what I'm trying to say is, the points that I've seen to not put possible SoL for Flashy don't really make sense. Just because someone is going serious doesn't mean going all out. Saitama's serious punch isn't his 100%, so why would we put a limit on Flashy when we have something saying he is faster than he has shown. Flashy doesn't have any anti-feats to go against what the databook stated.
That's why we should look at it case by case. Like I said before, he has nothing that proves it wrong, and his speed is close enough for it not to be considered a huge stretch.Because a lot of guidebooks statements for heroes are hyperbole, and the main cast don't show much feats that are even close to what the databook describes
I'll try find it but the quote was like: "Moving at the speed of light!" Or something like thatDoes anyone have the image saying he's SoL? Cause iirc it also comes off heavily as intentional hyperbole
He's getting downgraded tho, he's likely not even gonna be rel+ anymoreThat's why we should look at it case by case. Like I said before, he has nothing that proves it wrong, and his speed is close enough for it not to be considered a huge stretch.
Flash is at 0.55c... what do you mean not close?I've already stated, many of the statements are hyperbole, it's likely flash is as well as he hasn't shown a feat that is close to SOL
"getting" not "is" have you been reading the messages? FF is GOING to get downgraded, afterwards he prob won't even be sub-rel, I'm guessing.Flash is at 0.55c... what do you mean not close?