• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
technically he would be unquantifiable since he grows passively stronger all the time.
The chapter explains why he grew so strong against Garou. It isn’t just because he grows passively stronger.

it is unquantifiable by this wikis standards, but there’s no reason to assume it is any less than 4-A.
 
The chapter explains why he grew so strong against Garou. It isn’t just because he grows passively stronger.

it is unquantifiable by this wikis standards, but there’s no reason to assume it is any less than 4-A.
i mean he could've been really far into 4-B when fighting Boros since like 2 months or so passed. but yeah probs was still 4-A.
 
Guys. Did Saitama lose ALL his hair?
Em-txgnXMAI1d3e.jpg
 
Blast reagiu a isso , e Saitama e Garou são mais rápidos que ele. Embora eu estou supondo que isso vai ser fortemente contestado.
That's the problem, sometimes this shit wouldn't even reach that speed, but the 4 combined forces to squeeze this impact like it was a pipe, So it was super compressed, which in our world, would make it propagate endlessly faster, you you have to prove that he is as fast as the shock propagation of the attack, the best exemplifying is Like, drop a bucket of water on an iron plate and dps sends that same water only that hyper tense like this, the jet will become so fast that it will make the water cut the board
 
I can't wait for it never to be explained why God doesn't time travel and kill baby Blast or something, since he's actively been interfering with him, and the time travel will only exist for this one moment because Murata realized he needed a deus ex machina to return things to normal
 
Time travel without any sort of serious drawback is a dangerous power to give yhe portagonist, specially after his lack of seriousness cost his best friend's life. Realistically speaking, with his heroism pretty much nobody he has knowledge of would die, as he can just annihilate any sort of stakes in the story by going back in time, including his own carelessness.
 
you know what i find weird too, now that we learned basically everyone did die from cosmic radiation, saitama is mad chill about it...
saitama=the death chad
 
Time travel without any sort of serious drawback is a dangerous power to give yhe portagonist, specially after his lack of seriousness cost his best friend's life. Realistically speaking, with his heroism pretty much nobody he has knowledge of would die, as he can just annihilate any sort of stakes in the story by going back in time, including his own carelessness.
the drawback was the fact Saitama seemingly forgot about it
 
if the feat was calculated to be 1.11 ZettaFoe, so if Saitama had gotten 10 times stronger in the fight against Garou, would he get galaxy level?
Yes. Though you could only prove that if you assumed the bar graph was showing a linear change at even levels of power or something akin to that. Since End point Saitama is 16 lines higher than his starting levels of power.
 
Is the Milky Way the wiki's standard for galaxy level? Cause technically it's a somewhat large galaxy, at least compared to the smaller ones. Some galaxies aren't even 10k light years. I'm surprised we don't have tiers for dwarf galaxy level and large galaxy level, on second though.
 
Is the Milky Way the wiki's standard for galaxy level?
  • Solar System level: The star system known as the Solar System.
  • Multi-Solar System level:Instead of doubling the value of Solar System level, the distance between two such systems needs to be accounted for as well. The calculation for energy required to destroy two solar systems was done, with the following assumptions:
    • Distance between them as the minimum distance between Sun and the next closest star, the Alpha Centauri.
    • A spherical blast, strong enough to obliterate the contents of both solar systems at the same time.
    • Hence, the value obtained is the energy required to destroy two solar systems at a realistic distance.
  • Galaxy level: The Milky Waygalaxy.
    • Galaxies in fiction tend to be destroyed completely, not dissociated. Hence, it is far more logical to index a common occurrence of compete obliteration instead of an obscure one like dissociation.
    • We have a different interpretation regarding black holes. Simply put, we disagree with the premise of utilization of black holes for energy outputs, primarily because black holes rarely follow any scientific logic whatsoever. To know more, continue to read here.
  • Multi-Galaxy level:Instead of doubling the value of Galaxy level, the distance between two galaxies needs to be accounted for as well. The calculation for energy required to destroy two galaxies was done with the assumptions:
    • Distance between them as the minimum distance between Milky Way Galaxy and the next closest similar-sized galaxy, the Andromeda galaxy.
    • A spherical blast, strong enough to obliterate the contents of both galaxies at the same time.
    • Hence, the value obtained is the energy required to destroy two galaxies at a realistic distance.
Multi-Solar is technically dwarf galaxy. We don't have such a tier because its presumably just something utterly uncommon for a tier.
 
Is the Milky Way the wiki's standard for galaxy level? Cause technically it's a somewhat large galaxy, at least compared to the smaller ones. Some galaxies aren't even 10k light years. I'm surprised we don't have tiers for dwarf galaxy level and large galaxy level, on second though.
si,eso es lo que hizo otra wiki
 
Wait until the rules are spelled out. For all we know, it could disappear next chapter.

Either way, Saitama hasn't demonstrated acausality.
well, the fact that he did the zero-punch is definitely limited acausality, since he was able to exist twice for a short period of time (hence the limited)
 
well, the fact that he did the zero-punch is definitely limited acausality, since he was able to exist twice for a short period of time (hence the limited)
or it's just the mechanic of the time travel where the person time travelling exists for a few seconds before merging with the past version
 
well, the fact that he did the zero-punch is definitely limited acausality, since he was able to exist twice for a short period of time (hence the limited)
That honestly depends on the mechanics of the time travel being used. If it is normal to have a short time where a time traveler can exist twice, then that isn't really a feat for Saitama. It would only be a curious detail about his time travel.
 
the acausality is quite blatantly acknowledged, it is literally stated that he ended the fight without punching him, which is a direct result of acausality
you shouldn't downplay just because your headcanon says everybody can do it. Maybe it will change in the future but for now your scenario isn't really based on anything at all
 
the acausality is quite blatantly acknowledged, it is literally stated that he ended the fight without punching him, which is a direct result of acausality
you shouldn't downplay just because your headcanon says everybody can do it. Maybe it will change in the future but for now your scenario isn't really based on anything at all
that's make sense
 
the acausality is quite blatantly acknowledged, it is literally stated that he ended the fight without punching him, which is a direct result of acausality
you shouldn't downplay just because your headcanon says everybody can do it. Maybe it will change in the future but for now your scenario isn't really based on anything at all
Technically the Saitama from the future punched him though the Saitama from the present didn't. It's precisely because it might change in the future that I wouldn't be fine with giving Saitama an ability based on something that hasn't really been explained properly and has only been shown in the newest chapter that has only recently been revealed and translated.
 
Do we consider Saitama more skilled or a better martial artist than Garou now?
he maybe seems like he has the ability to be? Seems weird considering the thing with Suiryu was showing he didn't really get Martial Arts at all. There's also the fact he's faster iirc, so that helps him. But either way, he wouldn't use any of it. He copied one of Garou's moves just to mock him seemingly (which was also just a karate chop), and that was it. He didn't do anything else with martial arts, he just did his standard "Overwhelm with strength and speed" thing
 
Back
Top