Falling rubble doesn’t have any shot at killing an 8-C dude to begin with, so that’s not a valid angle. People tend to forget how many hundreds of times more durable an 8-C is than a 9-C
Wouldn't he need at least decent to not be reduced into paste with a single thing and also to hurt him somewhat?
Reminds me of when spiderman beat Firelord but worse.
Shovel Knight fighting Kratos is just AP, SS and Durability, not necessarily LS
Lifting Strength is not AP. Kratos never grabs Shovel Knight and Shovel Knight sure as shit doesn't grab Kratos, but he can eat Kratos' hits pretty well actually
Can you explain the canonicity of that? Is it like a one off thing only for the gow profiles while SK verse remains as it is?
Difference being, tier 8/7 actually have feats and consistency, unlike tier 2 where is just one fight.
Yeah so no straightforward comparison of ls to invalidate it. Still seems shaky.
If you want to use an anti-feat apply it to everything. you can't pick and choose Lephyr.
As I've explained, Buzz Lightyear and Woody have two keys based on the exact same thing for Kingdom Hearts 3, so we can do so for Shovel Knight too.
Yeah, no cherrypicking.
This is not correct. The dark magic releasing was the enchantress' body without Shield Knight. After they defeat her finally to stop her spread, then they mentioned they needed to escape the tower.
I don't support a GoW key, ngl. I could see SK getting a "possibly" on the UES tho.
I mean yeah that would work. I do prefer it to scaling everything from SK to Kratos. Maybe a note to the profile implying main version did fight kratos.
I'm picking to stick with the actual scale showcased by the verse.
That's literally stretching a single instance to force consistency, come on now.
And that's fine, I'm not just gonna let ya pick and choose anti-feats when those same anti-feats apply to the current tiers too
If that's the standard, then whatev.
Incorrect, the last scene ended with remnant of fate dying and releasing a bunch ****** laser beams, causing the tower to collapse
Outliers exist in the first place because something comic writers have brief moments of having a peak human martial artist punching down titanium walls and forget their scaling. It’s just that, simple mistakes.
Yeah doing it that way seems to be the best. Though I do think the canonicity should be mentioned somewhere.
The profiles already do in the note section, check there.
Outliers in fiction are correlated with statistics, but the only reason they’re considered unusable is due to it being an error or brief lapses in judgement by an author which clearly doesn’t represent their intent. And the outlier page even notes that it should only be used in extreme cases to begin with, so a single debunked anti feat wouldn’t cut it even if we only had one statement.
Thanks didn't notice it.
Pretty confused why that even happened, they just scale to their dura in KH
By this logic not just GoW, but every single verse on this site would get nuked to kingdom come. 9-C Supes, Athletic Human "lightning timers", so on and so forth.
Now it is LOL.
No, because they have lore statements that suggest a higher scale. Unlike SK. (Also, Atlas literally is holding, at the absolute least, a world, come on now KLOL)
You have no ******* idea the length people will go to downplay that shit. Just ask that stupid-ass imgur scan album. Or the Spanish blogs that pass their day around calling me vermin because I don't agree with how they interpret the feats.
You are acting as if Reaper’s OP isn’t founded on the very fact that there are too many statements to ignore
This is just me operating within my mental limits BTW. If any of the other experts, like say, Aetheric_Pariah or Planck were to confront them, they would tear them to shreds, and that's saying something.
I trusted you
I absolutely do, I deal with it everyday with Star Wars and other verses I support outside the site.
Don't worry my goat, i will support you with
My guy... I'm not arguing against canonicity. It's 100% canon, I literally even said I knew about it already before this thread.
-17 social credit
