• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Shouldn't the scarlet king be ranked higher than 1-B mainly because 682 and 076 are also hyperversal and it is implied that the scarlet king dwarfs th

Shouldn't he be ranked higher though mainly because of the comparison between 682 and 076 who were his foot soldiers that helped him kill other gods( sorry if this is random and I sound like an idiot)
 
Most of SCP is probably going to 2-A, but it would not either way. 1-B is a gigantic tier, at present one would need to be atop an infinite dimensional structure to get to High 1-B instead of just a large stack. Viewing a 200k/countless/whatever dimensional char in the same way that they view a 3D is not a transcendence of infinite dimensions.

Dimensional stuff is in flux rn, but if you want to know the current standards better I would recommend reading the Tiering System and Dimensional Tiering pages.
 
Why would they be 2-A? there is a lot of proof of distinct tier 1 spatial dimensions with qualitative superiority over lower spatial dimensions
 
Go post this stuff in the server then because people been waiting on this for a while

doesn't affect his question either way though so I'd prefer large debate over that being held there where it's more productive
 
I posted it last time i was asked about it, there are numerous higher-d SCPs that explicitly see 3-D beings as flat/physically lower-dimensional with the same beings being unable to percieve those SCPs
 
2-A is 4D though
 
Its not 4-D, its SCPs that are anywhere from 5 to 11-D, beings that the 1-B entities view as practically nonexistent due to them being lower-dimensional to them

Also the fact that the tier 1s explicitly need lower-dimensional avatars just to be able to properly interact with 3-D reality
 
Back
Top