Seth the Programmer and Chuck the Cyber **** calcs

[SupremeGilgamesh]

I meant to ask this since seeing a comment Seth made about discussing here about Naruto AP

Should we use Seth and Chuck videos as a way of scaling?

Yes:

No:

And then explain why

 

[LordGriffin1000]

Unless their scaling is legit (Which it's not some of the times) and their calcs are properly evaluated by the right people. No we shouldn't use their videos for scaling, Seth takes the anime for scaling as well which we don't really do.

Basically it's a case by case basis and even then we would need to add the information to the wiki because we can't just link Seth's or Chuck's videos on our profiles for justification.

 

[Dzhindzholia]

Agree on calcs part with LordGriffin.

Tottaly disagree on using their scaling methods.They just throw away terms like "PIS" ,"Inconsistency" and "Outlier".

Shortly,they wank characters a lot,sometimes you can even laugh at the reasons.

 

[DMB_1]

They do recognize outliers, but only when they are ridiculously unsubtle, like Batman kicking the Specter.

We, on the other hand, focus much mroe on the consistency of someone's feats, rather than just picking the highest one unless it breaks every form of scaling.

 

[Agnaa]

We, on the other hand, focus much mroe on the consistency of someone's feats, rather than just picking the highest one unless it breaks every form of scaling.

Eh, we get the highest consistent feat. It's not like we average out 100 feats to get the average result they output.

Meaning if there's 10 9-C feats, 5 9-B feats and two 9-A feats, we rate the character 9-A, with the highest of the two feats.

 

[Hellbeast1]

I remember Chuck claimed Doomsday is on par with True Form Darkseid

 

[Andytrenom]

Outliers are kinda subjective tho, so there will obviously be differing opinions as to whether a feat is a "subtle outlier" or not.

 

[Andytrenom]

Eh, we get the highest consistent feat. It's not like we average out 100 feats to get the average result they output.

Meaning if there's 10 9-C feats, 5 9-B feats and two 9-A feats, we rate the character 9-A, with the highest of the two feats.

9-C feats are barely feats for anyone 9-A and above

 

[Agnaa]

Sure but even if there's something like one High 8-C feat and 8 9-B feats, the 9-B ones will be put as casual and the higher-but-not-outlier value of High 8-C will be used.

 

[Andytrenom]

Tbh being featless will be better support for the one high 8-C feat being legit than than having 8 9-B feats.

 

[Agnaa]

Sure but a lot of times characters in tier 8 have casual feats of knocking characters into walls, cracking floors, etc. They don't destroy city blocks with every shrug.

 

[Andytrenom]

Yeah. My opinion on an outlier is basically "if there isn't a long history of someone performing feats only around a certain level or if there isn't a feat that explicitly show what level of power the character can reach, do not consider the high end feat an outlier."

There is more but those are the main things.