• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball GT God Tier Upgrade: The Big (and simple) One

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah was about to say this can't actually be applied yet:

"For all content revision suggestions, a grace period of 48 hours should be allowed for the reviewing staff members to evaluate and approve them. This grace period applies to both minor and self-evident revisions, as well as larger revisions that may require more input from other staff members. This is to ensure that all staff members have the opportunity to review the suggested revisions and provide their input, even if the initial explanation post in a content revision thread is quite large and complicated. Until this grace period has elapsed since the time of the thread's creation, the revision should not be applied to the profiles."

Have no strong feelings about the CRT itself, just wanted to point out that they can't actually be upgraded to 2-C just yet.
 
StrymULTRA said:
When the CRT is literally influenced from a site revision one, it's better to wait dude.
Click to expand...
Nah, 2-C for the God tiers is legit, so there is nothing to wait.

As for people who backscale, well, after that thread is over, depending on the result they might go down to Low 2-C or keep 2-C.

But by now, trust me it's better like this. I don't want this thread to turn into a 9 pages one.

Also, Antvasima came here and didn't complain about it, and said that this fine to apply, so it's fine.
 
Dust_Collector said:
Yeah was about to say this can't actually be applied yet:

"For all content revision suggestions, a grace period of 48 hours should be allowed for the reviewing staff members to evaluate and approve them. This grace period applies to both minor and self-evident revisions, as well as larger revisions that may require more input from other staff members. This is to ensure that all staff members have the opportunity to review the suggested revisions and provide their input, even if the initial explanation post in a content revision thread is quite large and complicated. Until this grace period has elapsed since the time of the thread's creation, the revision should not be applied to the profiles."

Have no strong feelings about the CRT itself, just wanted to point out that they can't actually be upgraded to 2-C just yet.
Click to expand...
They can.

2-C is legit, God tiers should have it.

The problem are the characters that backscale, that's what that thread was meant for.
 
Dust_Collector said:
Yeah was about to say this can't actually be applied yet:

"For all content revision suggestions, a grace period of 48 hours should be allowed for the reviewing staff members to evaluate and approve them. This grace period applies to both minor and self-evident revisions, as well as larger revisions that may require more input from other staff members. This is to ensure that all staff members have the opportunity to review the suggested revisions and provide their input, even if the initial explanation post in a content revision thread is quite large and complicated. Until this grace period has elapsed since the time of the thread's creation, the revision should not be applied to the profiles."

Have no strong feelings about the CRT itself, just wanted to point out that they can't actually be upgraded to 2-C just yet.
Click to expand...
 
Dust_Collector said:
Yeah was about to say this can't actually be applied yet:

"For all content revision suggestions, a grace period of 48 hours should be allowed for the reviewing staff members to evaluate and approve them. This grace period applies to both minor and self-evident revisions, as well as larger revisions that may require more input from other staff members. This is to ensure that all staff members have the opportunity to review the suggested revisions and provide their input, even if the initial explanation post in a content revision thread is quite large and complicated. Until this grace period has elapsed since the time of the thread's creation, the revision should not be applied to the profiles."

Have no strong feelings about the CRT itself, just wanted to point out that they can't actually be upgraded to 2-C just yet.
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
What the other staff members here have accepted is probably fine to apply, but I will ask some more of them for help in order to make certain.

@SamanPatou @Maverick_Zero_X @Elizhaa @LordGriffin1000 @Starter_Pack @Sir_Ovens @Theglassman12 @DemonGodMitchAubin

Would you be willing to help out here please?
Click to expand...
Well, Ant gave a warning that it could, so it's all good!
 
Let me explain the difference between this feat and the Beerus and Champa feat
It’s assumed Beerus and Champa’s power together makes a baseline 2-C feat (2 space times effected) so they would be below 2-C but above Low 2-C still making them high into Low 2-C

the difference
3 space times are being threatened to be destroyed so it’s not baseline 2-C thus the same logic cannot be applied since it’s not the same as the baseline 2-C feat it’s higher into 2-C already with 3 space time continumms so they would still be 2-C downscaling 10x
 
"For all content revision suggestions, a grace period of 48 hours should be allowed for the reviewing staff members to evaluate and approve them. This grace period applies to both minor and self-evident revisions, as well as larger revisions that may require more input from other staff members. This is to ensure that all staff members have the opportunity to review the suggested revisions and provide their input, even if the initial explanation post in a content revision thread is quite large and complicated. Until this grace period has elapsed since the time of the thread's creation, the revision should not be applied to the profiles."

well it is 48 hrs since the creation of the thread, we should have waited a little longer
 
omegabronic said:
"For all content revision suggestions, a grace period of 48 hours should be allowed for the reviewing staff members to evaluate and approve them. This grace period applies to both minor and self-evident revisions, as well as larger revisions that may require more input from other staff members. This is to ensure that all staff members have the opportunity to review the suggested revisions and provide their input, even if the initial explanation post in a content revision thread is quite large and complicated. Until this grace period has elapsed since the time of the thread's creation, the revision should not be applied to the profiles."

well it is 48 hrs since the creation of the thread, we should have waited a little longer
Click to expand...
Alright so the rest of the changes can be applied?
 
Maverick_Zero_X said:
Uh yeah we can, the rules say the changes couldn’t be applied yet and edits can be reverted.
Click to expand...
Thank you for helping out.

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

I am not sure if our rules currently mandate waiting for a minimum of 48 hours with applying threads after they were started or after they were been accepted though, but I think it was the former.
 
Antvasima said:
Thank you for helping out
Click to expand...
I think it was at least 48 h from the thread creation. As I recall, it was made to not rush revisions past stuff’s gazes.

Considering the amount of votes agreeing, as well as how it is mostly uncontroversial (since it scales to cosmology we already approved) it can probably be applied.

Low 2-C vs 2-C argument still stands though.
 
pineappleman said:
Based on Omegabronic's thread, Syn Shenron and SSJ4 Vegeta will be given the 'At most 2-C' rating.
Gogeta, Omega Shenron and Goku will be given 2-C outright
I'll apply the changes once the pages have been unlocked.
Click to expand...
That’s for Baseline 2-C this is destruction of 3 space times so it would still be 2-C this isn’t the same as the Beerus and Champa feat they would still be 2-C
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

RedReaper616
  • Locked
GT Goku Profile
2 3
Replies
112
Views
5K
LephyrTheRevanchist
LephyrTheRevanchist
ChoursDropoff
  • Locked
Dragon Ball GT Hax Addition (mostly).
2
Replies
60
Views
5K
UchihaSlayer96
UchihaSlayer96
Ednaxel2
  • Locked
Dragon Ball Toei: Bits & Bobs
Replies
16
Views
2K
Ednaxel2
Ednaxel2
Vietthai96
  • Locked
Dragon Ball CRT: The..........................Dragon Balls?
Replies
34
Views
3K
LephyrTheRevanchist
LephyrTheRevanchist
Ednaxel2
Dragon Ball: Fixing page names & quick Vegito upgrade
Replies
14
Views
2K
AwkguyDB
AwkguyDB
Back
Top