• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

RWBY Revision´Part III: Deciding the Stats

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kepekley23 said:
Mere physical training can't just move you up so many tiers but whatever

Tell that to our neighbourhood Park Ranger
I have no idea what you're talking about
 
Cumulonimbus clouds are 1.0-3.0 g/m^3 according to that page.
 
Its weird because one of the sources I saw in that thread has been change and does not seem to have the 1.003kg/m^3 value anymore.
 
Also, all the sources that say 1.003kg/m^3 are copy pasted, they say the same thing about the Blue Whales, something seems fishy.
 
Yep, I calced All Might's feat at only 1.7 kilotons (Small Town level).
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Guys

there are multiple sources for 1.003

Nothing is going to be changing any time soon
And there are seemingly several for 0.5g/m^3 amd many sources seem to be copypasted for the 1.003
 
^ This, and the Original Source of the 1.003kg/m^3 changed to 0.5g/m^3.
 
Actually it says 0.5 g/cm^3. You guys all got m^3 and cm^3 confused. m^3 = 1,000,000 cm^3. So 0.5 g/cm^3 would be 500 kg/m^3.
 
"One measurement of cumulus-cloud density is about 0.5 gram per cubic meter."
 
Well what about using the density of the air instead? The momentum of the air is what moves the clouds in the first place. Using just the cloud mass, and not the air mass doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me tbh.

Water is usually at most only 1% of our atmosphere. So the density of the cloud being far below the density of the air makes sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top