• If you appreciate the VS Battles wiki, and can afford it, please make a donation to help keep our forum running, so we can continue to work hard to improve on the reliability of our wiki profile pages. If you want to be anonymous, don't enter your real name when you donate.

    Please click here if you are willing to help out.

Rule Violations Reports - 67

Status
Not open for further replies.
LimitBreakerX is a troll account, doing nothing but praising soviet russia and insulting people, such as calling Shadow Warrior an "autistic a**", and using autism as a reason he should be banned.
 

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,393
6,268
I'm going to be unable to respond to this for while so I'll just give my current stance on the current issues.

Sense Wok, a member of HR, is currently aware of the issues surrounding A6, any further discussion on this thread is superfluous. I've otherwise made my stance on the issue clear.

I currently highly suspect those three of being socks.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
17,690
7,961
Actually, all three of them look like socks if they were all made the same day just to FRA on the same thread. And some of them have suspicious usernames like HentaiCheese.

Also, I vaguely recall things related to A6colute being brought up back in 2017, but I agree it's an HR group material.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,853
21,926
Just to comment regarding A6colute: He was the first admin that I promoted in this wiki together with Kavpeny and DarkLK, he has faithfully and loyally helped me out for over 5 years, and has extremely seldom caused any trouble whatsoever. I definitely do not want to demote him just because he has a bad day.

In addition, that was a necro of an extremely old thread. It should have been closed regardless.
 
1,331
278
Ant how's that a Necro when the dude made the thread in April 5th? (just check his contributions to see that)
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,853
21,926
@Tllmbrg

I was referring to this thread:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/429949

@DarkGrath

Yes. If A6colute only has one outburst every few years, and is helpful the rest of the time, I think that is a pretty good track record.

Also, we should talk about such matters with him in private via fanfiction.net PMs, not any potential public embarrassment.
 
As he said, you should talk about such matters in private, and leave this topic behind on the RVR.

Also as Schnee said, that, while true, is a terrible comparision. While A6 did abuse his authority, it was not to an extreme extent. I do not approve of his actions and believe he should have some level of punishment, perhaps a temporary revocation. Though a permenant revocation seems to be drastic and unwarranted.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,853
21,926
@00potato

Yes. You are currently stirring up more trouble than A6colute did, and the latter has consistently been willing to help me out for 5 years, whereas you haven't. I would appreciate if you drop this. Thank you.
 

DarkGrath

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
3,650
1,859
I frankly don't believe "this person has helped out on the wiki for a long time" to be a good excuse for bad behaviour. Not one I support, at least.

All I really think is that A6 should just step away for a bit and take some time away, since judging by those messages, they likely aren't in a good mindset. That's all.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,853
21,926
I am just saying that he has been here helping out for a long time, and should be allowed to have a bad day every few years without everybody ganging up on him. Anyway, I agree that he should step back, try to calm down, and make a serious effort to stay polite when he talks about this subject again.
 

Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan

VS Battles
Calculation Group
9,255
1,228
Bad behaviour isn't excused by infrequency, but how helpful and well behaved a member was should also be considered, just like courts have more lenient sentences for people with a clearer criminal record.

Anyway I agree with Zark, this should be dropped and taken to HR.
 

Schnee_One

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
61,935
7,058
You did not go to the RVR first thing, you derailed a CRT thread first thing. Also I'm well aware of what you posted given I literally replied to it, so sarcastically saying "Hmmmmmmm I wonder if it's the post above yours" is counterproductive and given you were going to the RVR to criticize behavior this comes of as Hypocrisy.

It should, I don't disagree.
 
I think he should as I believe people should try to keep politics out of these discussions, and his name is bound to bring up arguements and prejudices. Even if he does not bring it up himself people seeing his name might be stirred to anger, thus it could engender controversy.

Anyway, we should pay attention regardless as many people so openly communist, even if only pretending to be, are trolls. This is furthered by how new his account is, as of now no immediate action is needed as he has yet to show himself to be a troll.
 

Super_Saiyan_God_Julian

Herald of the Julianforce
Joke Battles
Sysop
4,164
1,381
I agree with Agnaa and Scheee. His name is nothing to worry about.

Also, just because he might have "Communist" in his name, doesn't necessarily mean he might actually be one.
 

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,393
6,268
Is 8 Bit Theater really a fanon verse? I don't know, I don't read it, but I'm pretty sure it's its own thing.

That aside, yeah. Delete the profile and warn the guy. Give him some pointers on formatting while you're at it.
 
9,230
3,305
It looks like 8 Bit Theater has ripped sprites from Final Fantasy games, and character personalities based on them, so I'd say it's fanon.
 
9,230
3,305
According to Wikipedia, a lot of the original characters and plot points from FF1 are in 8-Bit Theater, which I don't think is the case for Red vs Blue and Halo.

But regardless, if this thing is to be pursued further it should have its own thread.
 
7,689
673
Doesn't halo acknowledge rvb's existence in easter eggs as it's made by a big-name company (that being roosterteeth) and really popular, compared to 8-bit theater which just rips sprites and names from FF1 for a quick parody? Theater is more comparable to the TFS abridged series
 

WeeklyBattles

VS Battles
Content Moderator
50,296
5,927
RvB is a completely original storyline with completely original characters that just uses assets from halo as models with very few references to Halo, its not at all comparable to 8-Bit Theater
 

Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan

VS Battles
Calculation Group
9,255
1,228

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,393
6,268
My first assumption was to not report because I assumed he didn't know, but his response ("Worth it.") Implies he did and didn't care.
 
Woah woah woah there buddy if you actually wanna get that serious for a simple joke that's really unnecessary

I mean the link itself didn't reveal that much other than the... glutes and other muscles in that area

If that thing really was that serious then i'm sorry for posting it
 
It is still against the rules, and simply accepting an apology kinda defeats the point of having rules in the first place. If you are truly sorry you would accept any (fair) punishment in order to prove it.

You still acted purposely against the rules, so I believe punishment is still warranted, though that is just my opinion, I have no real authority here.
 

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,393
6,268
It literally depicted three blow jobs. Also, the women's personal areas were clearly visible. It was not "just glutes".
 
Okay than, punishment is definitely warranted if it was that explicit. That is flat out pornography, not just mild nudity like he described it.
 
I mean the post within of itself was a clear parody of the "who is getting the best head" meme which is just that... a meme

which shouldn't be taken that seriously, yeah i know you're doing your job but trying to give a ban to someone who literally posted it for laughs shouldn't allowed

A simple warning would be enough
 
9,230
3,305
The Wright Way said:
It literally depicted three blow jobs. Also, the women's personal areas were clearly visible. It was not "just glutes".
To be fair, from how the camera was positioned you couldn't see the blow job taking place (keeping things in line with the "who's getting the best head" meme), but yeah, the women's private parts were pretty public there.
 

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,393
6,268
AngeronTheSkyHighAnger said:
I mean the post within of itself was a clear parody of the "who is getting the best head" meme which is just that... a meme

which shouldn't be taken that seriously, yeah i know you're doing your job but trying to give a ban to someone who literally posted it for laughs shouldn't allowed

A simple warning would be enough
Buddy, time and place. If you posted that shit at work, you'd get fired. If you brought a picture of that to a golf club or some other hobby club, you'd be banned. It's no different here.
 
What's up with you trying to ban me?

I've never broken any rules before, why would i by simply breaking one rule be banned at all?

a warning would be enough in anyway you look at it
 

Super_Saiyan_God_Julian

Herald of the Julianforce
Joke Battles
Sysop
4,164
1,381
Yeah, I'm sorry, but you don't post such content in a public website "just for laughs". I'm afraid I must agree with a short ban as suggested above.
 
AngeronTheSkyHighAnger said:
What's up with you trying to ban me?
I've never broken any rules before, why would i by simply breaking one rule be banned at all?

a warning would be enough in anyway you look at it
1. Because you posted Porn onto a site in which minors access it daily,

2. because it is a major rule, it is not just "some insignificant ruke" you are making it out to be
 

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,393
6,268
Because you posted porn. Very explicit porn. That simple really. The only reason you're getting off this light is because no actual malice was meant.

You'll be back in two weeks or a month anyways, depending on what's decided.
 
I'm Blue daba dee daba die said:
AngeronTheSkyHighAnger said:
What's up with you trying to ban me?
I've never broken any rules before, why would i by simply breaking one rule be banned at all?

a warning would be enough in anyway you look at it
1. Because you posted Porn onto a site in which minors access it daily,
2. because it is a major rule, it is not just "some insignificant ruke" you are making it out to be
It wasn't even a physical image it was a link in a thread that probably was filled with references to NSFW content
 

Super_Saiyan_God_Julian

Herald of the Julianforce
Joke Battles
Sysop
4,164
1,381
I think 2 weeks is appropriate, considering he wasn't malicious, and he seems like a generally nice user otherwise.

Again, please be more careful in the future.
 

Elizhaa

VS Battles
Sysop
12,422
2,778
Do not post links to pornographic material. This will lead to an automatic ban without warning.
From what I read, AngeronTheSkyHighAnger is deserving of a ban. I checked the link and it is porn; one month looks appropriate as discussed above so I will make it.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
17,690
7,961
Okay, I definitely cannot stress enough how against Fandom's TOS it is to upload porn on non-pornographic oriented wiki. Anyway, making jokes about sex aren't bad as long as they aren't extreme. But it is against the rules to make NSFW links or upload porn on the wiki. And for reference, if a thread is known for going too overboard and has been prone to attracting people going overboard, then it's often preferable to close the thread before it gets worse.

Anyway, I'm not entirely sure if the ban is needed if the intent wasn't malicious and has been constructive beforehand, but a strict warning is in order. And he must promise not to upload any more porn or make links to pornographic content. Though, I don't mind giving out a short block if that's what others agree with.
 

Elizhaa

VS Battles
Sysop
12,422
2,778
I think two weeks is more appropriate; it was agree by others and it didn't like AngeronTheSkyHighAnger took the warning seriously until now; I made the block.
 
1,409
216
These two look like they could be socs, they post on the same threads and come in on the same day, each one giving support where the other appears.

Though I might just be wrong and wierd.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
17,690
7,961
Same with Titris, and we just had three accounts who did the exact same thing yesterday. Seems extremely highly likely, but want to ask more input from other staff before blocking.
 

Jaften

Joke Battles
Thread Moderator
508
72
>three brand new accounts make similar posts on the same threads on the same day

They're 100% socks.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,853
21,926
Thank you for helping out. I also think that a severe warning or 2 week block for Angeron is enough. We don't want him to miss out on our forum move after all.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,853
21,926
I deleted the suicide image. We shouldn't feature gore either. Women in bikini is barely acceptable going by Fandom standards, but not anything erotic whatsoever.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,853
21,926
Thank you to everybody who are helping out with the trolls btw.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,853
21,926
Yes, I find zombies to be a disgusting morbid concept, but unless they are graphic, images of them don't automatically compare with gore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top