• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violations Reports - 67

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Zark

Agreed.
 
Bad behaviour isn't excused by infrequency, but how helpful and well behaved a member was should also be considered, just like courts have more lenient sentences for people with a clearer criminal record.

Anyway I agree with Zark, this should be dropped and taken to HR.
 
@00potato

You have repeatedly been told to stop stirring up trouble. I would suggest that you start to follow this advise.
 
You did not go to the RVR first thing, you derailed a CRT thread first thing. Also I'm well aware of what you posted given I literally replied to it, so sarcastically saying "Hmmmmmmm I wonder if it's the post above yours" is counterproductive and given you were going to the RVR to criticize behavior this comes of as Hypocrisy.

It should, I don't disagree.
 
Yeah, he doesn't seem to be a troll, seems quite innocent as he is also commenting on Rainbow Six Seige Wiki and is being kind and helpful. But I can see why we would still want to keep an eye on him considering the name is very Troll-esque
 
He doesn't need to change his name, it's cool.
 
I think he should as I believe people should try to keep politics out of these discussions, and his name is bound to bring up arguements and prejudices. Even if he does not bring it up himself people seeing his name might be stirred to anger, thus it could engender controversy.

Anyway, we should pay attention regardless as many people so openly communist, even if only pretending to be, are trolls. This is furthered by how new his account is, as of now no immediate action is needed as he has yet to show himself to be a troll.
 
I am talking about how others might react, but I see your point. If he doesn't bring up politics himself it should be fine.
 
I agree with Agnaa and Scheee. His name is nothing to worry about.

Also, just because he might have "Communist" in his name, doesn't necessarily mean he might actually be one.
 
Is 8 Bit Theater really a fanon verse? I don't know, I don't read it, but I'm pretty sure it's its own thing.

That aside, yeah. Delete the profile and warn the guy. Give him some pointers on formatting while you're at it.
 
It looks like 8 Bit Theater has ripped sprites from Final Fantasy games, and character personalities based on them, so I'd say it's fanon.
 
According to Wikipedia, a lot of the original characters and plot points from FF1 are in 8-Bit Theater, which I don't think is the case for Red vs Blue and Halo.

But regardless, if this thing is to be pursued further it should have its own thread.
 
Doesn't halo acknowledge rvb's existence in easter eggs as it's made by a big-name company (that being roosterteeth) and really popular, compared to 8-bit theater which just rips sprites and names from FF1 for a quick parody? Theater is more comparable to the TFS abridged series
 
RvB is a completely original storyline with completely original characters that just uses assets from halo as models with very few references to Halo, its not at all comparable to 8-Bit Theater
 
Take it to a different thread. I've made a report that's getting ignored because of this.
 
For 8 Bit Theater discussion, here's a thread from a few weeks back about whether it should be allowed. It got one yes response since this profile for it was already up.
 
My first assumption was to not report because I assumed he didn't know, but his response ("Worth it.") Implies he did and didn't care.
 
I dunno, **** is pretty serious.

Although I don't think a perma ban is needed since he was productive before he did this, it was obvious that **** is disallowed, and his attitude wasn't that remorseful.

So maybe a month ban???
 
Woah woah woah there buddy if you actually wanna get that serious for a simple joke that's really unnecessary

I mean the link itself didn't reveal that much other than the... glutes and other muscles in that area

If that thing really was that serious then i'm sorry for posting it
 
It is still against the rules, and simply accepting an apology kinda defeats the point of having rules in the first place. If you are truly sorry you would accept any (fair) punishment in order to prove it.

You still acted purposely against the rules, so I believe punishment is still warranted, though that is just my opinion, I have no real authority here.
 
It literally depicted three blow jobs. Also, the women's personal areas were clearly visible. It was not "just glutes".
 
Okay than, punishment is definitely warranted if it was that explicit. That is flat out pornography, not just mild nudity like he described it.
 
I mean the post within of itself was a clear parody of the "who is getting the best head" meme which is just that... a meme

which shouldn't be taken that seriously, yeah i know you're doing your job but trying to give a ban to someone who literally posted it for laughs shouldn't allowed

A simple warning would be enough
 
The Wright Way said:
It literally depicted three blow jobs. Also, the women's personal areas were clearly visible. It was not "just glutes".
Click to expand...
To be fair, from how the camera was positioned you couldn't see the blow job taking place (keeping things in line with the "who's getting the best head" meme), but yeah, the women's private parts were pretty public there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
37 38 39
Replies
2K
Views
113K
TWILIGHT-OP
TWILIGHT-OP
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
A minor addition about discussion rules
Replies
4
Views
804
Deleted member 40688
  • Locked
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
21
Views
2K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
Mr. Bambu
  • Locked
Slight Adjustment to Rules Regarding Original Works
2 3
Replies
80
Views
9K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top