- 13,138
- 20,847
How did this happen...?is this the wrong thread or what
Had to have been way too tired or something because I could've sworn I sent the right thread. Anyways, here's the report
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How did this happen...?is this the wrong thread or what
I'd be content to grant leniency as well, for the record, although given that his complaint seems to be that this is to be regarded as a negative thing at all, I'm uncertain he would accept. It's his choice, though.Being this the case can you guys spare him and maybe each of the members with a warning. I think Ryzen is just extremely frustrated.
Ah.How did this happen...?
Had to have been way too tired or something because I could've sworn I sent the right thread. Anyways, here's the report
If he changes his mind, he can request that we undo his ban via my, Bambu's, or Medeus' message wall. However, I think that Bambu mentioned a two weeks ban before he can return.Being this the case can you guys spare him and maybe each of the members with a warning. I think Ryzen is just extremely frustrated.
It seems more like a joke question than anything?I don't know if this violates any rules, but this question was made that somewhat feels... deep enough to the point where it may even be suicidal, especially since OP isn't clear if they mean fictional characters or actual users.
Yeah, I don't think that's really an appropriate question to ask, nukedI don't know if this violates any rules, but this question was made that somewhat feels... deep enough to the point where it may even be suicidal, especially since OP isn't clear if they mean fictional characters or actual users.
Thank you, my apologies for posting in the wrong threadI will leave them a warning and revert their changes. This report should be here instead though.
I went on a mass delete spree, there may have been a few posts not so bad, but it's best to nuke everything related to the topic for safety reasons.Could some staff help calm things down in this thread? I think everyone is a bit extra because of election day.
Unpopular Opinions and (Friendly) Rant thread
Me trying to stay awake while he does literally anything: Your voice is forfeitvsbattles.com
I have sent them a message in private in case they need someone to talk with.I don't know if this violates any rules, but this question was made that somewhat feels... deep enough to the point where it may even be suicidal, especially since OP isn't clear if they mean fictional characters or actual users.
Here we go again...
Agreed, it's trying to start something that had no business being brought up on that revision thread.Well, it's not an appropriate comment for a Content Revision Thread. I guess it can be added to the warning tracker?
A warning seems fine then.Agreed, it's trying to start something that had no business being brought up on that revision thread.
Banned for vandalism 8 months ago? Doesn't seem to have been here long. But seems apology is reasonable.I have received a ban appeal request:
Antvasima
community.fandom.com
Further information is available here:
User contributions for TheLunyFan | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
User contributions for RaineWhispersIsHot | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
Our previous interaction in the thread shouldn't much matter for this since he was for the most part just giving me the same energy I gave him back. That said, his continued behavior afterwards with other members and the comment in question are grounds for a warning Yeah, if anything I just...vsbattles.com
What do other staff members here think?
I didn't know it was a staff thread tbh as there were other non staff comments there but ofc @Dark_Soul20189 weirdly loves me so much he stalks my entire activity to only point me out once again.
And I don't understand where you got "manipulation" from considering all I said was that the thread he made was already a rule violation since there's already a discussion ban about it (a fact pretty much everyone seems to agree with in the thread).
It was a staff thread since its creation. You would have to go to the staff discussion category, and click on the thread.I didn't know it was a staff thread tbh as there were other non staff comments there but ofc @Dark_Soul20189 weirdly loves me so much he stalks my entire activity to only point me out once again.
King_Nanaya was only able to point out two similar arguments used in the threads under the discussion rule.And I don't understand where you got "manipulation" from considering all I said was that the thread he made was already a rule violation since there's already a discussion ban about it (a fact pretty much everyone seems to agree with in the thread).
if someone messages a thread to you, it can be hard to tell what section its in.It was a staff thread since its creation. You would have to go to the staff discussion category, and click on the thread.
Well, I didn't have to go to any staff discussion category. I simply got a notification that someone made a tier 1 Nasu downgrade and I clicked on the notification.It was a staff thread since its creation. You would have to go to the staff discussion category, and click on the thread.
Yes it's not. I wasn't trying to make an argument. I was pointing out something that occurred.“They did it too” is not an argument.
You literallt used arguments about solar level Nasu. Same argiment that has been discused several times already. What are you talking about?King_Nanaya was only able to point out two similar arguments used in the threads under the discussion rule.
1 of the examples he pointed out used a completely different argument, and the other was from a thread that doesn’t even have any real discussion, it just got closed from copy and pasting from Reddit.
"Artificially inflating?" What does that even mean? Maybe you should following rules and stop stylishly disregarding them because of your downgrade-boner for the verse.Again, stop artificially inflating the issue to your benefit. I’ve noticed this pattern with you.
I genuinenly didnt even know it was a staff thread. Who makes a downgrade thread about Nasu tier 1 and limits it to staff members that most likely don't know much about the verse?if someone messages a thread to you, it can be hard to tell what section its in.
It's very easy to miss, and I almost posted my comment without realizing, until someone told me.
If not, we all know what was going to happen.I genuinenly didnt even know it was a staff thread. Who makes a downgrade thread about Nasu tier 1 and limits it to staff members that most likely don't know much about the verse?
This part is far more likely just a genuine mistake.Reporting @Tdjwo for commenting in a Staff thread without admin permission..
This however is becoming a pattern now. While I vehemently disagree there's any form of "manipulation of people to report" Wankbreaker, there's definitely an underlying issue of trying to constantly silence them which has been exhibited in various threads now.It becomes so much worse since the comment included, trying to manipulate people into reporting @Wankbreaker ... It is clear as day He is still going after Wankbreaker, even after what happened, in the last report. And to make things even better, he is still doing the thing he complained about...
There has to be an explanation on what "silencing" means because if I'm consistently pointing out something that Wankbreaker is doing wrong and it's still being disregarded as me simply silencing them in an inappropriate manner, then aren't I the one getting silenced?This however is becoming a pattern now. While I vehemently disagree there's any form of "manipulation of people to report" Wankbreaker, there's definitely an underlying issue of trying to constantly silence them which has been exhibited in various threads now.
Discussion rules are for repeated arguments. Very few of my arguments ( if any) are repeated. If you think otherwise, please cite what portion of my arguments are repeated, and cite the exact portion where they were addressed. Instead of a vague “this was already addressed, close this now.” As you’ve done to try and silence other people withThere has to be an explanation on what "silencing" means because if I'm consistently pointing out something that Wankbreaker is doing wrong and it's still being disregarded as me simply silencing them in an inappropriate manner, then aren't I the one getting silenced?
You agree that I did nothing wrong or intentionally malicious, so what makes me still in the wrong here? Calling out a broken rule by Wankbreaker, again?!