- 34,620
- 35,071
Well, it's not an appropriate comment for a Content Revision Thread. I guess it can be added to the warning tracker?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Well, it's not an appropriate comment for a Content Revision Thread. I guess it can be added to the warning tracker?
- 16,462
- 13,375
Agreed, it's trying to start something that had no business being brought up on that revision thread.
- 178,202
- 91,346
- Thread starter
- #28,563
I have received a ban appeal request:
community.fandom.com
Further information is available here:
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.com
What do other staff members here think?
Antvasima
community.fandom.com
Further information is available here:
Access Restricted | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
Access Restricted | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
Reporting this guy because they not only changed very important statistics, vandalizing Godzilla pages, but also just called me an idiot for nothing.
What do other staff members here think?
- 178,202
- 91,346
- Thread starter
- #28,564
A warning seems fine then.
- 8,829
- 9,419
As long as he shaped up his behavior, then I wouldn't mind him returning unless someone puts an eye on him
- 34,768
- 42,253
Banned for vandalism 8 months ago? Doesn't seem to have been here long. But seems apology is reasonable.I have received a ban appeal request:
Antvasima
Further information is available here:
Access Restricted | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
Access Restricted | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
Reporting this guy because they not only changed very important statistics, vandalizing Godzilla pages, but also just called me an idiot for nothing.
What do other staff members here think?
I'm okay with a 2nd chance, but another one to keep a watchful eye on and that were should be especially strict with if they repeat similar offenses.
- 5,187
- 4,308
Reporting @Tdjwo for commenting in a Staff thread without admin permission... It becomes so much worse since the comment included, trying to manipulate people into reporting @Wankbreaker ... It is clear as day He is still going after Wankbreaker, even after what happened, in the last report. And to make things even better, he is still doing the thing he complained about...
- 8,829
- 9,419
I guess that 1 week ban didn't really do much, I would push for a longer one but I'll see what the others has to say
Tdjwo
He/Him- 3,311
- 1,489
I didn't know it was a staff thread tbh as there were other non staff comments there but ofc @Dark_Soul20189 weirdly loves me so much he stalks my entire activity to only point me out once again.
And I don't understand where you got "manipulation" from considering all I said was that the thread he made was already a rule violation since there's already a discussion ban about it (a fact pretty much everyone seems to agree with in the thread).
And I don't understand where you got "manipulation" from considering all I said was that the thread he made was already a rule violation since there's already a discussion ban about it (a fact pretty much everyone seems to agree with in the thread).
Last edited:
- 1,728
- 1,633
It was a staff thread since its creation. You would have to go to the staff discussion category, and click on the thread.
“They did it too” is not an argument.
King_Nanaya was only able to point out two similar arguments used in the threads under the discussion rule.
1 of the examples he pointed out used a completely different argument, and the other was from a thread that doesn’t even have any real discussion, it just got closed from copy and pasting from Reddit.
Again, stop artificially inflating the issue to your benefit. I’ve noticed this pattern with you.
KingNanaya
He/Him- 3,163
- 4,395
if someone messages a thread to you, it can be hard to tell what section its in.
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/653290912679591939/1304457936445112433/image.png?ex=672f769f&is=672e251f&hm=f8935b388787b55c5468443709fa0f6bb34a0dd74539161ef00ba9dd3303f85d&
It's very easy to miss, and I almost posted my comment without realizing, until someone told me.
Tdjwo
He/Him- 3,311
- 1,489
Well, I didn't have to go to any staff discussion category. I simply got a notification that someone made a tier 1 Nasu downgrade and I clicked on the notification.
Yes it's not. I wasn't trying to make an argument. I was pointing out something that occurred.
You literallt used arguments about solar level Nasu. Same argiment that has been discused several times already. What are you talking about?
"Artificially inflating?" What does that even mean? Maybe you should following rules and stop stylishly disregarding them because of your downgrade-boner for the verse.
Tdjwo
He/Him- 3,311
- 1,489
I genuinenly didnt even know it was a staff thread. Who makes a downgrade thread about Nasu tier 1 and limits it to staff members that most likely don't know much about the verse?
- 4,746
- 7,365
Refrain from cluttering the RVRT, everyone. I believe what needs to be said has been said.
I can't evaluate this matter thoroughly at the moment, but other staff should be able to provide their input shortly, and it will only be easier if they have less posts to go through.
I can't evaluate this matter thoroughly at the moment, but other staff should be able to provide their input shortly, and it will only be easier if they have less posts to go through.
- 1,728
- 1,633
If not, we all know what was going to happen.
The thread would be at a minimum of 5 pages, and completely unreadable.
Nanaya let me know that he was going to comment on discord, and I essentially said “ok, go ahead”.
- 12,494
- 16,896
This part is far more likely just a genuine mistake.
This however is becoming a pattern now. While I vehemently disagree there's any form of "manipulation of people to report" Wankbreaker, there's definitely an underlying issue of trying to constantly silence them which has been exhibited in various threads now.
Tdjwo
He/Him- 3,311
- 1,489
There has to be an explanation on what "silencing" means because if I'm consistently pointing out something that Wankbreaker is doing wrong and it's still being disregarded as me simply silencing them in an inappropriate manner, then aren't I the one getting silenced?
You agree that I did nothing wrong or intentionally malicious, so what makes me still in the wrong here? Calling out a broken rule by Wankbreaker, again?!
- 1,728
- 1,633
Discussion rules are for repeated arguments. Very few of my arguments ( if any) are repeated. If you think otherwise, please cite what portion of my arguments are repeated, and cite the exact portion where they were addressed. Instead of a vague “this was already addressed, close this now.” As you’ve done to try and silence other people with
You did this to a previous nasuverse topic.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 20,450
- 15,959
Not really a report
But can some staff tell Slime supporters to not make unnecessary comments if there are no arguments to be made from their end and trying to fill the thread with replies which zero contribution? @Dark_Soul20189 made two replies with zero counter arguments related to the threads.
I just want to peaceful end the thread not with this antagonisms and unnecessary things piling up.
But can some staff tell Slime supporters to not make unnecessary comments if there are no arguments to be made from their end and trying to fill the thread with replies which zero contribution? @Dark_Soul20189 made two replies with zero counter arguments related to the threads.
I just want to peaceful end the thread not with this antagonisms and unnecessary things piling up.
- 12,785
- 23,076
Yeah, nothing report worthy here, members are free to express their disagreement with any topic if they wish. But it is always advisable to provide the reason why you disagree with something to see if such reasoning is valid and to be open to debate.
EldemadeDityjon
He/Him- 20,450
- 15,959
^
Yeah I just wants them argue instead of filling the page (we currently have less messages for a single page). Any staff who would want to evaluate would lose interest later onwards. So they might find it annoying if they see more pages even though no one has made any proper arguments and pages are filled with I disagree or I agree.
- 5,187
- 4,308
Fully understand, I wanted to state my disagreement, and leave the debating and explaining parts to the once much better than me at the job. let's be honest. It is much better and more coherent if we leave the explanation and debating part to a single person that can do the job better the job better. I currently have very little time due to IRL stuff and far from the best at explaining/debating things, but if worse comes to worse I will do my best to explain it.
Feel free to delete this message.
CathyEpic
She/Her- 6,581
- 2,899
Leo's Ultimate FC/OC Multi-Tier Duos Tourney [Completed]
Making another meme at night cause i’m bored
This guy is kinda just consistently being a jerk and has been openly antagonizing people participating in the tourney for a bit now. I think this is against the site rules.
- 5,163
- 11,793
I'd give that guy a warning for rude behaviour, but it seems like they also have a ban listed on their history. Though, I can't see it in their ban log; it seems like a rather old ban.Leo's Ultimate FC/OC Multi-Tier Duos Tourney [Completed]
Making another meme at night cause i’m bored
This guy is kinda just consistently being a jerk and has been openly antagonizing people participating in the tourney for a bit now. I think this is against the site rules.
Rayfire
Any/All- 3,946
- 2,908
I think i should add this has also been occuring in the final round of this tourney, and SSB has still been slandering nearly everyone despite me recommending him to just take a break from the forum to cool off. I won't explain exactly what's going on since that'd take a while, but i hope this can be resolvedLeo's Ultimate FC/OC Multi-Tier Duos Tourney [Completed]
Making another meme at night cause i’m bored
This guy is kinda just consistently being a jerk and has been openly antagonizing people participating in the tourney for a bit now. I think this is against the site rules.
- 178,202
- 91,346
- Thread starter
- #28,587
@DarkDragonMedeus @Mr. Bambu @Just_a_Random_Butler @Agnaa @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @DarkGrath @Dereck03 @Planck69
Just a regular reminder for this thread, since deleted posts seem to stop the automatic notifications due to a bug in XenForo or a XenForo plugin.
Just a regular reminder for this thread, since deleted posts seem to stop the automatic notifications due to a bug in XenForo or a XenForo plugin.
- 5,187
- 4,308
Bump...
- 2,060
- 3,920
I left a comment here, if it persists feel free to mention it.Leo's Ultimate FC/OC Multi-Tier Duos Tourney [Completed]
Making another meme at night cause i’m bored
This guy is kinda just consistently being a jerk and has been openly antagonizing people participating in the tourney for a bit now. I think this is against the site rules.
If a discussion rule is being broken, then it should be mentioned — that being said, I don't know anything about Nasu, so I can’t say if there actually was a discussion rule being broken, but believing that there may have been one and vocalizing it isn’t report-worthy in of itself. Now the manner in which they did so (blurting it out in a staff thread published by a user that they have history with, as opposed to mentioning it to a staff member on their wall) is obviously not acceptable, and they seem to acknowledge that.
Regarding the guy’s history with wankbreaker. Could it be that they are targeting them once more? Potentially — there is a genuine possibility that they are trying to undermine them and mask it as believing that a discussion rule being broken, however, I, personally, can’t conclusively say that and for that reason I don’t support any punishment.
Tdjwo
He/Him- 3,311
- 1,489
- 5,187
- 4,308
Pretty much the reason why I thought it was necessary to report since There is a history between the users and the attitude, that is repeatedly shown.
By the way, I forgot to link a comment regarding the report here.
This should be noted because it is the same problem that caused his last report here, here, and here (Couldn't find the report where he was reported for calling out Wank Breaker as a "biased translation"). Or is at least very much connected to it.
To make things worse, just some of the comments he has made, that is related to @Wankbreaker include. 1, 2 and 3. While they are nothing report worthy by themself, they speak volumes about the situation... Just read from here again, and see his arguments and mentality haven't changed.
It is clear at least some actions need to be taken.
Tdjwo
He/Him- 3,311
- 1,489
What's the point in linking a comment that catz most likely saw already? And Propelius didn't even address anything. Just jumped into conclusion without seeing any explanation. Why didn't you also post one of the possible reason I could have commented on the thread huh?
Fun fact, in case you can't read or understand, I wasn't in the wrong at all for this report. Wanker did indeed break the rule by not asking for perms which I pointed out. But the only reason I was at fault was because I didn't report it in the RvR which honestly shouldn't have been a big deal considering I tagged a staff member to stop Wanker from what he was doing. But that's besides the point.
Once again, Wanker did indeed use wrong translations with biased intentions since he's a translator but somehow can't make correct translations when it comes to Nasuverse. And just like before, I only didn't report in the RvR which is why I was blamed instead.
For someone who isn't a staff member yet obsessed with me, lurking through every comment I make, maybe if you actually tried judging with an open mind and open eyes, then you'll see that all the reports made against me never put me in the wrong because I maliciously attacked Wanker. Rather, I was indeed right with my accusations (biased translation, clogging up thread without perms, etc). The only reason I still was kept at fault was because I didn't report to RvR first.
Last edited:
- 2,060
- 3,920
No back and forth in the RVR. We are in the evaluation phase — let interested staff comment.
Could you please clarify your stance @LephyrTheRevanchist
After said ban was finished, they are now saying the thread shouldn’t continue because, according to them, Wankbreaker is breaking a discussion rule. Again, I don’t know if there actually is a discussion rule being broken or not, but believing someone has, is something they are allowed to do — it isn’t fundamentally ill-intentioned in my view.
Honestly this latest comment they’ve made seems more concerning than the discussion rule comment if I’m being honest — but I’ll wait to hear from other staff.
Could you please clarify your stance @LephyrTheRevanchist
Yes, I am aware of this. Their behavior was unacceptable, and because of that, this user was rightfully banned. I 100% support the ban they were given.
After said ban was finished, they are now saying the thread shouldn’t continue because, according to them, Wankbreaker is breaking a discussion rule. Again, I don’t know if there actually is a discussion rule being broken or not, but believing someone has, is something they are allowed to do — it isn’t fundamentally ill-intentioned in my view.
Honestly this latest comment they’ve made seems more concerning than the discussion rule comment if I’m being honest — but I’ll wait to hear from other staff.
KingNanaya
He/Him- 3,163
- 4,395
It was mentioned several times in the thread itself.
Once by @Maverick_Zero_X
Once by myself (with staff permission)
Once by @CloverDragon03 (I think)
And once by @Tdjwo
No one else has reviewed the thread or given their opinion on whether or not it conflicts with the discussion rule.
- 12,494
- 16,896
- 833
- 630
Idk if this is enought for a report but anyway, @Dog3352 keeps arguing out of ignorance in this thread (not only him but he is the most active). Anyway his comments will just clog the thread, i don't want something like this to happen (edit: here and here most of the messages are out of ignorance). Also, based on what he sayd we can easly deduce that he didn't even try to understand how things work in verse.
Last edited:
- 2,060
- 3,920
He made at most 4-5 comments, 1 of which was a refutation to the OP and then subsequent replies to people who responded to him - that isn't really clogging the thread, its just discussion. If they were completely pointless comments (i.e., just commenting "lol" / "lmfao", then that'd be fair, but his comments seem to be on-topic and relevant. If you can prove that his comments are out of ignorance and not out of disagreeing with the OP then that's another matter entirely, but otherwise, this doesn't break any rules in my view.
- 833
- 630
I can, the things he is saying are WRONG plot wise, he doesn't know what a soul or a core is, he doesn't know how skills work, he doesn't know anything verse wise. Still he keeps yapping. Just watch his last comment, complete nosense.
Edit: i can even explain why those things are nosense but idk if i can start yapping here
- 2,060
- 3,920
I should have worded that better; I am asking you to show that he is acting intentionally ignorant -- This is what would be report-worthy. Someone not knowing a series, and commenting on a thread about it is not a rule violation. Assuming what you're saying is true, and he is actually completely wrong (idk because Idk the verse), if he does genuinely believe in the things he is saying, then he has the right to express that. It becomes a problem if he doesn't actually believe the things he is saying, but is pretending to do so to disagree with the thread.
- 833
- 630
Well both Code CCL and Astral sayd to him to at least learn what a soul is in Tensura, which is a thing that he can learn in 2 minutes from researching on this wiki or from the external fandom wiki and he know about that wiki as he used scan from it. So he at least isn't even trying.
