DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 16,038
- 12,798
Not to meddle or anything but it does seem like you're parroting a lot and not actually providing evidence to your claims while trying to clown the people that ask for proof, going off of the messages in the thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You havent read the thread in question have you? I posted evidence backing my claims multiple times, Glass just decided to come in and be rude to me for no reasonNot to meddle or anything but it does seem like you're parroting a lot and not actually providing evidence to your claims while trying to clown the people that ask for proof, going off of the messages in the thread.
"Or the evidence you provide is insufficient, how about instead of claiming everyone who disagrees didn’t bother looking maybe prove there’s light speed statements in the first place"Literally what part of my comments towards you were condescending? Especially on the same level as:
“How about instead of arguing something you know absolutely nothing about you let the actual knowledgeable members discuss things and keep your words to yourself.”
If you cant be bothered to look at the first page of a CRT then i dont know what to tell you
This isn't condescending."Or the evidence you provide is insufficient, how about instead of claiming everyone who disagrees didn’t bother looking maybe prove there’s light speed statements in the first place"
Neither is this."Tone down the attitude Weekly. Do I need to remind you that you’re on thin ice with your status here?"
Or this."So where’s the evidence that they’re wrong? Do you wanna explain why they’re wrong or are you going to keep making baseless accusations."
Warning you and reminding you to act civilly when you actually are on thin ice isn't being condescending, at all.Youve been nothing but rude and condescending to me since you came into the thread while also ignoring quite literally the entirety of said thread where i did in fact provide evidence to back up what i was arguing multiple times.
I was being civil, he was being condescendingWarning you and reminding you to act civilly when you actually are on thin ice isn't being condescending, at all.
These quotes don’t really come off as personal attacks to me. Two of them just seem to be bluntly attacking your argumentation and asking for evidence, and the second one is just telling you to tone down your condescension."Or the evidence you provide is insufficient, how about instead of claiming everyone who disagrees didn’t bother looking maybe prove there’s light speed statements in the first place"
"Tone down the attitude Weekly. Do I need to remind you that you’re on thin ice with your status here?"
"So where’s the evidence that they’re wrong? Do you wanna explain why they’re wrong or are you going to keep making baseless accusations."
I'm reading the thread already. Based on what I can see so far, it just seems to be that you can't cope with the fact that a majority find the reasoning insufficient and he's pointing that out to you.I was being civil, he was being condescending
Which is a false attack seeing as i provided evidence to back up every argument i made in that thread, multiple times as a matter of factThese quotes don’t really come off as personal attacks to me. Two of them just seem to be bluntly attacking your argumentation,
I wasnt being condescending at all is the problem, Glass was being condescending to meand the second one is just telling you to tone down your condescension.
Not permabanned, just for a yearWeekly was already permabanned and then got brought back bruh
I really don't see how exactly he's being condescending when all he's just doing is trying to remind you to have stronger evidence to back up your claims.I was being civil, he was being condescending
If thats what he was doing it would have been fine but its not, he was actively claiming i had posted ZERO evidence, which is an outright lie. Like if he couldnt be bothered to read the thread its whatever, the thread is five pages long i can understand that and would have been happy to summarize it, but he didnt. He just barged into the thread with his first response being 'Weekly you have posted zero evidence to back up your claims, thats why youre wrong and thats why people disagree with you'. Thats not 'reminding me to have stronger evidence', thats just being a dick, something he does to me constantly.I really don't see how exactly he's being condescending when all he's just doing is trying to remind you to have stronger evidence to back up your claims.
If like 3 or 4 people are saying you have no evidence, after five whole pages, you PROBABLY didn't provide anything substantial, lol.If thats what he was doing it would have been fine but its not, he was actively claiming i had posted ZERO evidence, which is an outright lie. Like if he couldnt be bothered to read the thread its whatever, the thread is five pages long i can understand that and would have been happy to summarize it, but he didnt. He just barged into the thread with his first response being 'Weekly you have posted zero evidence to back up your claims, thats why youre wrong and thats why people disagree with you'. Thats not 'reminding me to have stronger evidence', thats just being a dick, something he does to me constantly.
And also, in any other case, literally almost everyone in the thread was asking you to provide better evidence and you never done any of that, but still insist on making them seem like they're wrong. And also, if you can't provide any concrete evidence to your claims in time, that's how your proposals get rejected.If thats what he was doing it would have been fine but its not, he was actively claiming i had posted ZERO evidence, which is an outright lie. Like if he couldnt be bothered to read the thread its whatever, the thread is five pages long i can understand that and would have been happy to summarize it, but he didnt. He just barged into the thread with his first response being 'Weekly you have posted zero evidence to back up your claims, thats why youre wrong and thats why people disagree with you'. Thats not 'reminding me to have stronger evidence', thats just being a dick, something he does to me constantly.
Those three or four people didnt read the thread thuroughly enough then smhIf like 3 or 4 people are saying you have no evidence, after five whole pages, you PROBABLY didn't provide anything substantial, lol.
I provided substantial evidence, the thread in question has more evidence for lightspeed provided than the majority of verses on the site that are lightspeed.And also, in any other case, literally almost everyone in the thread was asking you to provide better evidence and you never done any of that, but still insist on making them seem like they're wrong. And also, if you can't provide any concrete evidence to your claims in time, that's how your proposals get rejected.
I was chill and civil though? Glass was the one being rude to meI'm not even understanding the purpose of this argument anyways the thread is still ongoing and there's still plenty of discussion to be had so @WeeklyBattles lets chill out a bit because you are on of the most knowledgeable members when it comes to RWBY and I'd like for you not to be in this thread for violations so productive progress can be made elsewhere in that thread and especially with the new volume literally being RIGHT around the corner.
It'd be a hell of a time to really make things worse and get in trouble now so can we like apologize, chill, and keep things moving in a civil manner because I do value your opinion on this topic just don't lose your shit and take time to formulate everything so you can work to covince those in the thread on the topic.
Even if its rejected now gather more evidence and wait for new evidence but for now this isn't over for anyone involved
it's okay though that's all I'm telling you I get what you're saying but I really don't want to see you getting in trouble here and I hope I'm not sounding like an ass or something here either if so I'm sorry but lets drop it and keep things pushing even if you did nothing wrong a genuine apology will go a long way I'd say if you are continuously productiveI was chill and civil though? Glass was the one being rude to me
Same.I'm with Dale on this.
"This dude has the most exaggerated reaction I've ever seen lmao butthurt that much? "You literally talk about me everytime Mikey is a topic" tf is this dude talking lmao this is literally like the first time I've mentioned your name outside of your CTR and for a good reason, you sensitive bastard. And why do you keep bringing the "Daniel vs Mikey" matches lmao move on already my guy. It's only YOU who thinks that."
"Dawg please grow up. My God you be on yo period every time you comment. Stay on topic or keep it moving. I simply said don't mention my name(which you clearly did). I can reply when my name is mentioned. Simple human communication. Grow tf up"
Tbf, they are both very well-known for attacking each other in threads. I've been a witness for quite a few of them.Yeah, they're both sort of being clowns in that thread, although Agami is definitely worse. I've seen similar behavior from him in other threads, as well.
As a witness to most of their...interactions (I use that word very loosely), I can also confirm that Worthless tends to instigate the arguments first, which leads to yagami responding back in a toxic manner.Tbf, they are both very well-known for attacking each other in threads. I've been a witness for quite a few of them.
I'm just clarifying that behavior like that isn't allowed, but go off.@RandomGuy2345 I don't think taking threats from battleboarding user/powerscaler is serious.