- 165,692
- 73,424
- Thread starter
- #17,481
Anyway, should we ban @cloudyagami and @Worthless for 1 week or two weeks as a strict warning that verbally behaving like they were in a street fight is not allowed here?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you copy-paste large segments of content from other wikis to pages in our wiki or just into content revision threads? The former is not allowed, although the latter is not a problem.wait what. I dont think i got a warning for doing it beforehand
anyway yeah, according to good ol problemexe i copy pasted stuff from other wiki
only problem is...i see so many damn people copy paste stuff and yet im the only person that is getting reported for such a thing. its ridiculous
just content revision threads. none of my crts got accepted sadlyDid you copy-paste large segments of content from other wikis to pages in our wiki or just into content revision threads? The former is not allowed, although the latter is not a problem.
Anyway, should we ban @cloudyagami and @Worthless for 1 week or two weeks as a strict warning that verbally behaving like they were in a street fight is not allowed here?
I think 2 weeks was what suggested by you and mav, @Crabwhale was fine with either 1 or 2 as per what majority decides.2 weeks sounds good
Okay. Then you have not broken our rules.just content revision threads. none of my crts got accepted sadly
Okay. We need more input then.I think 2 weeks was what suggested by you and mav, @Crabwhale was fine with either 1 or 2 as per what majority decides.
Alright, I will keep this in my mind!Okay. Then you have not broken our rules.
It is also allowed to use a part of the same references as other wikis use, if they have first been accepted in content revision threads here in this forum, but definitely not to directly plagiarise their content to a significant degree.
Okay. I will also go along with use applying a 1 week ban for @cloudyagami and @Worthless then.I agree with Crabwhale
Ant reverted their edits and gave them instructions. If he keeps then a ban should be in order.I was about to report this, but I wasn't sure whether or not the changes were accepted with a CRT. Plus, I was pretty busy writing and drawing my webcomics.
He seems to just be clueless, I'd say just give him a warning on his wall and be done with it.
Telling this to someone while has been warned multiple times for aggressive and restless behavior and been banned and then still insulting againBut he did not seem to behave particularly badly this time. Isn't a permanent ban too harsh?
I already know how dumb you usually are and stubborn
He's being clearly aggressive with those insults so the ban seems warranted and he even said that he didn't wanted the be in this wiki and throws insults before getting banned last time.Due to your tiny pathetic brain you probably didn't understand a thing I just said
I mean the ban isn't because they are doing extreme things, it's because they aren't changing. If they make it clear they will continue with the behavior presented, what's the point in a temporary ban? They'll just come back and do the same thing. Might as well just ban them permanently at that point. Might sound stupid but I think the best option is a warning. Perma ban does kinda feel bad for a small infraction and a temp ban clearly isn't a solution. Give a severe warning about his attitude and if no improvement is shown, perma ban away regardless of seriousness.Well, I just think that the length of the ban in question may have been a bit extreme.
That's because you're searching on Google instead of on the wiki itself. The profile is still fine.Guys, it seems that a profile of our fandom disappeared or was deleted, it's Yhwach's profile
Guys, it seems that a profile of our fandom disappeared or was deleted, it's Yhwach's profile
I can't find anymore
oh seems to make sense me and a friend here too thoughts the profile has disappeared im sorryThat's because you're searching on Google instead of on the wiki itself. The profile is still fine.
Please take that to Human Resources than here
I know. This can easily become a highly controversial situation. But I also don't believe that just because someone has great Power on the wiki, that we should turn a blind eye to what they do. I advise that this be taken with the upmost seriousness and calmness capable.
I believe that what the user @Antvasima has posted here is in direct violation of our site rules. I believe that in this post, Antvasima showed
- Blatant and Belligerent Disrespect to other User's
- A lack of reasonability and open mindedness
Not only have multiple members already scolded Antvasima for this behavior, but some have seemingly shown to think this is also a highly disrespectful and closed minded comment on Antvasima's part. Usually though, I wouldn't really report something like this, if it was a one time deal. But the member's surrounding these events have indicated that this is a consistent occurrence, which looking at the thread, it does appear to be. This can be seen if you look into the previous message's and message's coming after the reported one in this thread.
Antvasima's constant response is to apologize, before also citing his personality type, and how he can be blunt at time's. But, while it can be understandable that a Personality can cause one to accidentally offend, repeated offenses cannot just be excused with this. When it happen's over and over again, one would think someone would either learn what they're doing wrong and stop it, or at least take less involvement to reduce the risk of offending someone. This has been a cycle of Antvasima acting in a inappropriate and offensive manner, being called out for it, apologizing, attempting to explain his actions with his Blunt nature, before reverting soon after to this behaviour.
This is frankly unacceptable, and I believe that action should be taken accordingly in regards to this.
I would also like to clarify that I hold no quarrel with Antvasima, should such a accusation be made. As a matter of fact, I hold little opinion beyond being thankful for the help he has provided to the wiki. But I find that the action's here are a inexcusable loop that require's attention and due action.
With all this said however, I have no direct involvement with this situation, nor do I hold any further information about it. So unless Staff explicitly request's for my input (Which I believe need not be the case), I will refrain from messaging this thread in reference to this report as per the guideline's laid out for this thread. I sincerely hope that this report is followed up with the correct action's, and that things remain productive and as civil as possible here.
Strictly speaking I don't believe that Antvasima's posts there warrant a serious punishment, but HR can at least address it with Antvasima and find a way to stop it from happening again.It’s hard for me believe that even the person at the highest level of this site is getting punished.
understandable, I know that even being bureaucrat does not mean you are above the rules but I still find it hard to believe even the bureaucrat of this site breaking rules.Strictly speaking I don't believe that Antvasima's posts there warrant a serious punishment, but HR can at least address it with Antvasima and find a way to stop it from happening again.