• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Theglassman12 said:
Literally what part of my comments towards you were condescending? Especially on the same level as:

“How about instead of arguing something you know absolutely nothing about you let the actual knowledgeable members discuss things and keep your words to yourself.”
Click to expand...
"Or the evidence you provide is insufficient, how about instead of claiming everyone who disagrees didn’t bother looking maybe prove there’s light speed statements in the first place"

"Tone down the attitude Weekly. Do I need to remind you that you’re on thin ice with your status here?"

"So where’s the evidence that they’re wrong? Do you wanna explain why they’re wrong or are you going to keep making baseless accusations."

Youve been nothing but rude and condescending to me since you came into the thread while also ignoring quite literally the entirety of said thread where i did in fact provide evidence to back up what i was arguing multiple times.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
"Or the evidence you provide is insufficient, how about instead of claiming everyone who disagrees didn’t bother looking maybe prove there’s light speed statements in the first place"
Click to expand...
This isn't condescending.
WeeklyBattles said:
"Tone down the attitude Weekly. Do I need to remind you that you’re on thin ice with your status here?"
Click to expand...
Neither is this.
WeeklyBattles said:
"So where’s the evidence that they’re wrong? Do you wanna explain why they’re wrong or are you going to keep making baseless accusations."
Click to expand...
Or this.
WeeklyBattles said:
Youve been nothing but rude and condescending to me since you came into the thread while also ignoring quite literally the entirety of said thread where i did in fact provide evidence to back up what i was arguing multiple times.
Click to expand...
Warning you and reminding you to act civilly when you actually are on thin ice isn't being condescending, at all.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
"Or the evidence you provide is insufficient, how about instead of claiming everyone who disagrees didn’t bother looking maybe prove there’s light speed statements in the first place"

"Tone down the attitude Weekly. Do I need to remind you that you’re on thin ice with your status here?"

"So where’s the evidence that they’re wrong? Do you wanna explain why they’re wrong or are you going to keep making baseless accusations."
Click to expand...
These quotes don’t really come off as personal attacks to me. Two of them just seem to be bluntly attacking your argumentation and asking for evidence, and the second one is just telling you to tone down your condescension.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
I was being civil, he was being condescending
Click to expand...
I'm reading the thread already. Based on what I can see so far, it just seems to be that you can't cope with the fact that a majority find the reasoning insufficient and he's pointing that out to you.

The above posted quotes aren't being condescending either. H3 could've been a lot harsher than "tone it down".
 
Maverick_Zero_X said:
These quotes don’t really come off as personal attacks to me. Two of them just seem to be bluntly attacking your argumentation,
Click to expand...
Which is a false attack seeing as i provided evidence to back up every argument i made in that thread, multiple times as a matter of fact
Maverick_Zero_X said:
and the second one is just telling you to tone down your condescension.
Click to expand...
I wasnt being condescending at all is the problem, Glass was being condescending to me
 
Propellus said:
I really don't see how exactly he's being condescending when all he's just doing is trying to remind you to have stronger evidence to back up your claims.
Click to expand...
If thats what he was doing it would have been fine but its not, he was actively claiming i had posted ZERO evidence, which is an outright lie. Like if he couldnt be bothered to read the thread its whatever, the thread is five pages long i can understand that and would have been happy to summarize it, but he didnt. He just barged into the thread with his first response being 'Weekly you have posted zero evidence to back up your claims, thats why youre wrong and thats why people disagree with you'. Thats not 'reminding me to have stronger evidence', thats just being a dick, something he does to me constantly.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
If thats what he was doing it would have been fine but its not, he was actively claiming i had posted ZERO evidence, which is an outright lie. Like if he couldnt be bothered to read the thread its whatever, the thread is five pages long i can understand that and would have been happy to summarize it, but he didnt. He just barged into the thread with his first response being 'Weekly you have posted zero evidence to back up your claims, thats why youre wrong and thats why people disagree with you'. Thats not 'reminding me to have stronger evidence', thats just being a dick, something he does to me constantly.
Click to expand...
If like 3 or 4 people are saying you have no evidence, after five whole pages, you PROBABLY didn't provide anything substantial, lol.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
If thats what he was doing it would have been fine but its not, he was actively claiming i had posted ZERO evidence, which is an outright lie. Like if he couldnt be bothered to read the thread its whatever, the thread is five pages long i can understand that and would have been happy to summarize it, but he didnt. He just barged into the thread with his first response being 'Weekly you have posted zero evidence to back up your claims, thats why youre wrong and thats why people disagree with you'. Thats not 'reminding me to have stronger evidence', thats just being a dick, something he does to me constantly.
Click to expand...
And also, in any other case, literally almost everyone in the thread was asking you to provide better evidence and you never done any of that, but still insist on making them seem like they're wrong. And also, if you can't provide any concrete evidence to your claims in time, that's how your proposals get rejected.
 
TheMonkeMan said:
If like 3 or 4 people are saying you have no evidence, after five whole pages, you PROBABLY didn't provide anything substantial, lol.
Click to expand...
Those three or four people didnt read the thread thuroughly enough then smh
Propellus said:
And also, in any other case, literally almost everyone in the thread was asking you to provide better evidence and you never done any of that, but still insist on making them seem like they're wrong. And also, if you can't provide any concrete evidence to your claims in time, that's how your proposals get rejected.
Click to expand...
I provided substantial evidence, the thread in question has more evidence for lightspeed provided than the majority of verses on the site that are lightspeed.
 
I'm not even understanding the purpose of this argument anyways the thread is still ongoing and there's still plenty of discussion to be had so @WeeklyBattles lets chill out a bit because you are on of the most knowledgeable members when it comes to RWBY and I'd like for you not to be in this thread for violations so productive progress can be made elsewhere in that thread and especially with the new volume literally being RIGHT around the corner.


It'd be a hell of a time to really make things worse and get in trouble now so can we like apologize, chill, and keep things moving in a civil manner because I do value your opinion on this topic just don't lose your shit and take time to formulate everything so you can work to covince those in the thread on the topic.

Even if its rejected now gather more evidence and wait for new evidence but for now this isn't over for anyone involved
 
Dalesean027 said:
I'm not even understanding the purpose of this argument anyways the thread is still ongoing and there's still plenty of discussion to be had so @WeeklyBattles lets chill out a bit because you are on of the most knowledgeable members when it comes to RWBY and I'd like for you not to be in this thread for violations so productive progress can be made elsewhere in that thread and especially with the new volume literally being RIGHT around the corner.


It'd be a hell of a time to really make things worse and get in trouble now so can we like apologize, chill, and keep things moving in a civil manner because I do value your opinion on this topic just don't lose your shit and take time to formulate everything so you can work to covince those in the thread on the topic.

Even if its rejected now gather more evidence and wait for new evidence but for now this isn't over for anyone involved
Click to expand...
I was chill and civil though? Glass was the one being rude to me
 
Ok as someone who had been actively following the thread I will say this:

I did notice Weekly was being somewhat rude with his petty comments which I noted in this post here. I didn’t find Glassman particularly rude nor did I find him threatening Weekly like was said in the thread. It was more just an average warning given out because of some noticeable agitation in the messages.

Honestly what I think happened is that Weekly may have read Glassman’s messages with a condescending tone in mind and so responded with more outward agitation.

I understand dude that scaling and arguing with people is frustrating I get it. But believe me, you piss yourself off more than anyone else right.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
I was chill and civil though? Glass was the one being rude to me
Click to expand...
🗿it's okay though that's all I'm telling you I get what you're saying but I really don't want to see you getting in trouble here and I hope I'm not sounding like an ass or something here either if so I'm sorry but lets drop it and keep things pushing even if you did nothing wrong a genuine apology will go a long way I'd say if you are continuously productive
 
Well, Weekly is frustrated in general both because he isn't mentally feeling well and since he genuinely thinks that other members here are recurrently deliberately provoking him, being mean to him, and trying to get him banned, due to old grudges, even though he really wants to stay here, and except for myself he is the member with the highest amount of wiki edits, so like Dalesean027, I would much prefer if he can remain unbanned, and I do think that he keeps getting reported by others for mostly minor reasons, so there may be some truth to that others want to find pretexts to get rid of him.

I think that the best solution here is for Weekly to apologise for being frustrated and irritable, to give himself a bit of a fresh start of goodwill, and for other members to try to be nicer to and not provoke him, so he gets the chance to feel better and calm down in general and get along with others better in the long run.
 
Sorry for busting in but isn't this report a little bit too thin-skinned in the first place? Like unless I am missing some notable insults I don't see anything besides basic vsbw banter, something that in somewhat greater cases required a tap on the wrist at best from staff. I get that petty comments can lead to fights but at this point it feels unfair to just report a person for being mildly petty. Am I wrong here?
 
Last edited:
@Worthless and @cloudyagami are being hostile towards eachother in this thread.
"This dude has the most exaggerated reaction I've ever seen lmao butthurt that much? "You literally talk about me everytime Mikey is a topic" tf is this dude talking lmao this is literally like the first time I've mentioned your name outside of your CTR and for a good reason, you sensitive bastard. And why do you keep bringing the "Daniel vs Mikey" matches lmao move on already my guy. It's only YOU who thinks that."
"Dawg please grow up. My God you be on yo period every time you comment. Stay on topic or keep it moving. I simply said don't mention my name(which you clearly did). I can reply when my name is mentioned. Simple human communication. Grow tf up"
Click to expand...

Agami is being a lot more hostile than the other user, considering he wants to start actual IRL fights with other members:
"You dont know me from a can of paint i' 100% guaranteed ive been in far more fights than you its not even debatable. We can prove this as well since you want to get personal"
Click to expand...
 
RandomGuy2345 said:
Tbf, they are both very well-known for attacking each other in threads. I've been a witness for quite a few of them.
Click to expand...
As a witness to most of their...interactions (I use that word very loosely), I can also confirm that Worthless tends to instigate the arguments first, which leads to yagami responding back in a toxic manner.

Worthless does it again in the Mikey CRT, specifically on this comment, when there was really no need for those levels of hostility.

Of course, this doesn't justify yagami's actions in the slightest. Sending verbal threats is very ****** up, but if someone's constantly poking a bear, and then they end up getting mauled to death by said bear, who do you think is to blame for that? Exactly.
 
RandomGuy2345 said:
Worthless does it again in the Mikey CRT,
Click to expand...
My intention here wasn't really to initiate a war. I'm just being specific by mentioning the name of the dude I've discussed those matters with, which is him. Oh yeah i get why he would get angry by it but who can blame me he is mad annoying he keep accusing me this and that just cause i don't agree with him.
 
Worthless said:
My intention here wasn't really to initiate a war. I'm just being specific by mentioning the name of the dude I've discussed those matters with, which is him. Oh yeah i get why he would get angry by it but who can blame me he is mad annoying he keep accusing me this and that just cause i don't agree with him.
Click to expand...
"This dude has the most exaggerated reaction I've ever seen lmao butthurt that much? "You literally talk about me everytime Mikey is a topic" tf is this dude talking lmao this is literally like the first time I've mentioned your name outside of your CTR and for a good reason, you sensitive bastard. And why do you keep bringing the "Daniel vs Mikey" matches lmao move on already my guy. It's only YOU who thinks that."
Click to expand...
If you're hopping over to threads and making comments like this, it really comes into question what you're intentions are.

Imho, this is blatant instigating/causing a flame war, which is something you've done a fair bit.
 
RandomGuy2345 said:
If you're hopping over to threads and making comments like this, it really comes into question what you're intentions are.

Imho, this is blatant instigating/causing a flame war, which is something you've done a fair bit.
Click to expand...
I'm referring to this:
I've already discussed this Dark Impulses with that annoying Cloudy guy but i think Mikey should also have limited resistance to Curse and Mind Manipulation for being able to suppressed his "Dark Impulses" (which causes him to act like a murderer) because Dark Impulses is not just a psychotic behavior impose by a traumatic or similar events, but a supernatural thing that was passed down on him due to the time travel ability.
Click to expand...
The one you quoted yeah i admit I've gone too
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FinePoint
  • Locked
Discussion Rule Word Salad
Replies
22
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kachon123
One Piece: Planet Size Discussion Rule
Replies
14
Views
2K
RaikiKurohane99
RaikiKurohane99
FlipLaScript
Loosening Up Tier 1 Rules
2
Replies
44
Views
2K
Kanogami
Kanogami
Back
Top