- 26,160
- 3,653
None of the comments I saw from him would fit hellbent. His derailing wasn't out of nowhere, since it was either a single line or something that fully connected to what was already being talked about. And whenever arguments were brought up, he always answered all off them, so the main problem with derailing - losing what the discussion was about - was never a problem.Acting like a complete douche hellbent on derailing for the sake of derailing even when told multiple times not to is where I'd draw the limit on this.
Doesn't really matter with what I am saying, does it? My point is you can't complain about being constantly asked to comment. It was one of the reasons of the last time he was given a warning, which was brought up as a reason for this to be more than a warning.Funny you say that, DDM's rebuttal is almost complete. Unfortunately DT is taking a break so that big thread of his will still have to wait but the rebuttal is incoming hard.
There isn't, or at least wasn't, any rule against arguing against the new standard at the time, so this was. not something he had to do, no.I dunno, couldn't he just contact the staff members involved in the CRT to discuss his issues once more before being given permission to do so?
That is meaningless. He could have developed this opinions after, had a too stressful irl life at the moment to get into heated arguments, whatever. Opinions aren't timed events, he can disagree well after an argument was made.Also I definitely saw him being active when the Creation Feats CRTs were being made and operated.
Because he disagrees with them. He read them all, he quoted arguments from them and answered with his disagreements. What clarification did he need?So why he would complain about it even after learning the CRTs were finished and turned into rules is beyond me. Seriously, spending 10 minutes for a simple clarification doesn't hurt.
Again, he didn't break any rules, written or unwritten. He saw a standard, read the thread they were introduced with, and disagreed with them.
I did. I think they are superfluous and not something worth of "strict warnings" or anything more. The worst thing I see is Clueless saying his position was common sense. As brought up before, this is no worse than stuff like him being told people will always disagree with his stance. Neither is worth taking as something that needs to be reported.It seems you haven't exactly seen my complaints or Glassman's, have you.