• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Everything12 said:
Sure.
Click to expand...
I ran into a small little problem
Oops! We ran into some problems.
You may not start a conversation with the following recipients: Everything12.
Click to expand...
Can you see if you can create it for me?
(Just make sure that You and me can invite others to the conversation, Mainly the staff that have knowldge bout Tensura willing to help Re-evaluate it)
 
I've had a look at a number of CRTs sent to me. It all seems to make some sense, so I can safety say that deletion should not be considered and everything should be reevaluated at most. Though I do believe that their is at least enough their that some staff would agree to it.
 
I didn't really have to be the one to make this report but somebody had to, and this post is not acceptable as I'm sure you know @The_Yellow_Topaz. Trust me, I get being frustrated with other users on here sometimes but this language is beyond the limit. So I put it out there for other staff members to evaluate.
 
Not that aware of her history, but I don't really think she should be banned for this as it just seems that she's just frustrated with the way things are going on over there, and I can sympathize with that. I feel like she should just be warned and told to cool it down
 
Propellus said:
Not that aware of her history, but I don't really think she should be banned for this as it just seems that she's just frustrated with the way things are going on over there, and I can sympathize with that. I feel like she should just be warned and told to cool it down
Click to expand...
Not everything will go down towards her favor; for civil debates to be viable then all parties will have to be respectful. Frustration isn’t a way to tolerate one’s behavior, unless they have a justified reason to do so.
 
Banned once in 2023 for toxicity and definitely subtly warned since then to knock it off. Two warnings on the tracker although one of those was very slight and the other culminated in a weeklong ban. A definite level of disrespect for staff handling these various outbursts, however, is noted.

...at the same time, one does try to see the good in their users, and in this element of the situation I would agree with Propellus that this is a matter of extremely impassioned arguing resulting in a critical meltdown. I do hate to punish people for pursuing what they truly believe in, but then there cannot be total immunity, either.

Her last formal warning was in mid-2023, we are now swiftly approaching a year since then. It seems likely that similar behavior has occurred since without being reported, but even still, I am in favor of some level of leniency. Only once. I would also find a short ban (2 weeks to a month) to be a stern but reasonable conclusion.
 
Mr. Bambu said:
Banned once in 2023 for toxicity and definitely subtly warned since then to knock it off. Two warnings on the tracker although one of those was very slight and the other culminated in a weeklong ban. A definite level of disrespect for staff handling these various outbursts, however, is noted.

...at the same time, one does try to see the good in their users, and in this element of the situation I would agree with Propellus that this is a matter of extremely impassioned arguing resulting in a critical meltdown. I do hate to punish people for pursuing what they truly believe in, but then there cannot be total immunity, either.

Her last formal warning was in mid-2023, we are now swiftly approaching a year since then. It seems likely that similar behavior has occurred since without being reported, but even still, I am in favor of some level of leniency. Only once. I would also find a short ban (2 weeks to a month) to be a stern but reasonable conclusion.
Click to expand...
This is reasonable but "Suck my dick" comments are usually pretty hard to tolerate regardless of motive.
Therefir said:
The user 24mZz is going through random profiles and deleting all their content.
Click to expand...
Permaban away yes.
 
Duedate8898 said:
Without any knowledge of her history on site, looks like a simple case of a warning would be what we get here. Also probably a suggestion to take a bit of a break to calm down a little bit.
Click to expand...
Propellus said:
Not that aware of her history, but I don't really think she should be banned for this as it just seems that she's just frustrated with the way things are going on over there, and I can sympathize with that. I feel like she should just be warned and told to cool it down
Click to expand...
CloverDragon03 said:
I think the appropriate punishment depends on her warn/ban history. Based on the warning tracker, she's been given two warnings for disruptive behavior.
Click to expand...
GarrixianXD said:
Not everything will go down towards her favor; for civil debates to be viable then all parties will have to be respectful. Frustration isn’t a way to tolerate one’s behavior, unless they have a justified reason to do so.
Click to expand...
Mr. Bambu said:
Banned once in 2023 for toxicity and definitely subtly warned since then to knock it off. Two warnings on the tracker although one of those was very slight and the other culminated in a weeklong ban. A definite level of disrespect for staff handling these various outbursts, however, is noted.

...at the same time, one does try to see the good in their users, and in this element of the situation I would agree with Propellus that this is a matter of extremely impassioned arguing resulting in a critical meltdown. I do hate to punish people for pursuing what they truly believe in, but then there cannot be total immunity, either.

Her last formal warning was in mid-2023, we are now swiftly approaching a year since then. It seems likely that similar behavior has occurred since without being reported, but even still, I am in favor of some level of leniency. Only once. I would also find a short ban (2 weeks to a month) to be a stern but reasonable conclusion.
Click to expand...
DarkDragonMedeus said:
This is reasonable but "Suck my dick" comments are usually pretty hard to tolerate regardless of motive.
Click to expand...
If it has been a long time since Topaz's last warning, and they have generally been well-behaved, I am personally fine with a very strict final warning or a two weeks block.
 
Is anyone in contact with Topaz who can attest to her emotional state since making the comment? A verdict can be reached either way, but I think it is a relevant extenuating factor. The comment was not acceptable by any standard, but I believe it was also a product of a lapse of judgement at a very unstable time. This doesn't excuse it, or make it 'better', but it does reframe how I'd approach handling it. I don't think it would do her, or the site, or the community at large any benefit to pursue a ban if she has calmed down since then and can rejoin discussions.
 
Vzearr said:
I woke up today to this. I tried to help him previously but I wasn't able to do what he wanted (pixel scale) so he decided it would be a good Idea to call me an idiot, insult my family and threaten to f*ck me.

Even though he was warned by Catzlaflame to not spam peoples message walls, he's been spamming my message wall.
Click to expand...
I would think this warrants just instigating a perma-ban and being done with it. Clearly not someone who wants to engage with the site in any beneficial way.

I'll handle it myself if at least one other moderator or admin would find this verdict acceptable.
 
DarkGrath said:
Is anyone in contact with Topaz who can attest to her emotional state since making the comment? A verdict can be reached either way, but I think it is a relevant extenuating factor. The comment was not acceptable by any standard, but I believe it was also a product of a lapse of judgement at a very unstable time. This doesn't excuse it, or make it 'better', but it does reframe how I'd approach handling it. I don't think it would do her, or the site, or the community at large any benefit to pursue a ban if she has calmed down since then and can rejoin discussions.
Click to expand...
@The_Yellow_Topaz
 
Can someone tell Arcker to take me out his banner because he basically just screenshotted an argument we had to be funny and I told him to remove it (too lazy to find the proof but it's there) before he never cared. Very offended because it makes me think everyone who sees his banner is gunna have a bad opinion of me and laugh and sometimes i cry myself to sleep thinking about it. He's a repeated offender of my harassment and he makes me depressed. So much so I bought a ukulele just to have something to do when I'm crying.
 
Can someone tell Raven that it's improper to have a signature that's heavily sexualized on a site that's filled with minors. She's been told to not do this multiple times in the past, but she ignores these requests made by the mods and continues participating in this behavior everytime she has the chance. It shows a clear level of disrespect to the mods who ask her kindly not to do this, and the members who don't want to see sexual things when they log onto the site.
 
Deceived3596 said:
Can someone tell Raven that it's improper to have a signature that's heavily sexualized on a site that's filled with minors. She's been told to not do this multiple times in the past, but she ignores these requests made by the mods and continues participating in this behavior everytime she has the chance. It shows a clear level of disrespect to the mods who ask her kindly not to do this, and the members who don't want to see sexual things when they log onto the site.
Click to expand...
Actually I was never told about that. You're referring to sexual implication comments on the bleach general discussion thread. As far as signatures go, I usually confirm if it's okay before I add one. Didn't this time though. Stop being soft. And this is misinformation as in some of my questionable signatures i got confirmation from staff first. I have proof of that too buddy
 
Last edited:
Arcker123 said:
Lmao
Click to expand...
Don't act like you're not part of the problem. Let's not forget, you have a record of causing issues for Raven including misgendering her and accusing her of being a catfish (Monkeeman situation). I'm not staff here, but you really don't need that banner, it's only going to create issues. Best to just ignore each other and move on without creating random jabs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
37 38 39
Replies
2K
Views
113K
Dereck03
Dereck03
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
  • Featured
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
6K
Agnaa
Agnaa
  • Locked
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
21
Views
2K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
711
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top