- 8,997
- 9,713
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 30,420
- 32,273
Blocked
- 165,705
- 73,447
- Thread starter
- #15,763
Thank you for helping out. It is unfortunate that Sniper670 choose a self-destruction option. I do not think that he was a bad member as such.
Given the unusual circumstances here, should we let him keep his wiki account unblocked?
Given the unusual circumstances here, should we let him keep his wiki account unblocked?
- 18,393
- 14,310
I don't think he will violate anything in the fandom wiki, as he still respects the rules there. At least, he can have a chance to rethink his choices.
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,211
Pro IRA chant, should probably be removed 
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,211
Situation is handledPro IRA chant, should probably be removed
- 5,879
- 1,068
- 9,265
- 6,620
Are you guys seriously doing this here
- 19,469
- 10,098
I’m reporting @LIFE for his behavior in this thread. From this point onward he acts needlessly aggressive towards the users for no reason. I even gave him a warning about his attitude and he doubles down on his behavior.
- 30,420
- 32,273
I gave him another warning, we may take action if this persists.
- 30,420
- 32,273
If that is the case, a short ban seems justified. 2 months sounds good?
- 13,902
- 5,396
In my personal opinion, there should be a mandatory standard grace period for all reports for contacting people to have them speak in defense of themself. Though it does happen often, I just suggest that it could be a good idea to make official.
Not to intrude or anything so, I'm not gonna say anything more than this.
Not to intrude or anything so, I'm not gonna say anything more than this.
- 10,442
- 8,916
I know this is unrelated to the subject. You guys can delete this comment if necessary
The idea of someone defending himself should be a rule on this site, give a minimum time for a defense like 12 hours or 24 hours. I have seen numerous cases on this site where people are banned without even being able to comment on what happened.
The idea of someone defending himself should be a rule on this site, give a minimum time for a defense like 12 hours or 24 hours. I have seen numerous cases on this site where people are banned without even being able to comment on what happened.
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 16,493
- 13,475
Sure but it should probably vary, IMO. Like if someone spams a racist slur or posts something illegal I don't think there'd be a way to defend them unless they made a really good apology to it.
- 32,811
- 38,022
Reporting ZillerTheBucko for making this comment and getting significantly heated up in this thread. Man is literally doing everything he can to justify calc stacking no matter how bad the actual values get.
EDIT: If this isn't enough, Ziller has a history of making comments like these. Just... look this up.
EDIT: If this isn't enough, Ziller has a history of making comments like these. Just... look this up.
- 10,442
- 8,916
"Shut the **** up" is nothing tbh and should not be worthy to be here
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 16,493
- 13,475
Technically that guy was adding fire to his flame by saying that he got clowned once again and being sarcastic about his comments. Not defending any of it or telling you to change your judgement of the situation but I just wanted to make note of that.
- 32,811
- 38,022
He's pretty much been getting pissed at OPM threads as of late, I'm sure @Emirp sumitpo, @LordTracer, @Lightning_XXI and a few other OPM supporters can give you more evidence of Ziller's behavior. In any case, this is repeated behavior and he has been warned before for this.
- 32,811
- 38,022
Not defending the other guy but that response was made because Ziller was literally advocating for bad wiki practices by glorifying calc stacking to a degree and then even berating the wiki for banning it because "muh big numbers".
- 32,811
- 38,022
He got warned for it prior a few times so him repeating it again is definitely grounds for reporting it here.
- 19,469
- 10,098
Did he remotely get reported for this comment or no? Because this is just out of line.
- 32,811
- 38,022
COMPLETELY FORGOT ABOUT THIS COMMENT.
Here's the link if anyone is interested: https://vsbattles.com/threads/homelander-tries-to-solo-your-favorite-verses.141877/post-5091712
- 12,098
- 19,129
If there hasn't been a ban before, there honestly should be one for how aggressive he has tended to be, glorifying bad practices like KLOL has mentioned, and... he also has some sort of hero complex about "fixing the wiki" for some reason? Pretty much dismisses anyone that disagrees with him and apparently will be ableist about it too, shown by him going "Shut the **** up you deranged Alzheimer's patient."
- 15,296
- 15,480
I was just about to mention that. He got warned by DDM, but I don’t think he was actually reported for it.
- 9,354
- 9,843
He was stating his opinion. Whether bad or not, that's not reason to then gang up on the dude and not expect he get heated.
- 30,420
- 32,273
I agree more with KLOL, while I haven't personally seen him act harsh normally, I'm sure others know more than me. Though I don't think a ban is needed but just some warnings.
- 12,098
- 19,129
Deserves way more than a warn tbh
Kept presenting it in a way as if he is objectively correct, as proven by his attitude toward people who disagree with him
- 32,811
- 38,022
"Shut the **** up" is not stating an opinion at all.
Neither is calling someone a "deranged Alzheimer's patient".
- 30,420
- 32,273
Nvm about the "Not sure if that's ban worthy" concern, this is a seriously inflammatory post and warrants a pretty lengthy ban.
- 9,354
- 9,843
Before that, he was. The same dude constantly made fun of him (which you supported with a kudos btw), until he got heated.
- 32,811
- 38,022
Not sure why you gave him a warning only but oh well
- 12,098
- 19,129
Okay, glad we're on the same page about that. He only got warned for that before, which I thought was far too lenient
Similar threads
