- 4,298
- 2,800
NO AZONTR, DON'T CALL HER A QUEEN, IT ONLY LEADS TO NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCESFelt honored for being called a queen
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NO AZONTR, DON'T CALL HER A QUEEN, IT ONLY LEADS TO NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCESFelt honored for being called a queen
I’d like to point out that before adding on the 3-C rating, the feat in question was asked by and brought up to DMUA who said the rating was fine. That’s why it was added in the first place.Can we take a moment to talk about why the 3-C justification is ok? It was an assisted effort by Mori, Daewi, and Mira, and you'd need a calc of the destruction to list it as 3-C. You can't just assume it's 3-C "because galaxy".
Yap, immunity to both + it is type 1.Np, incidentally, transduality will only cover light and dark?
Hence why I didn't want to rush a CRT.I'm adding the scans, wait a bit. Adding scans and references to an entire profile is hard yknow.
How does he have immunity exactly Or where has he shown.Yap, immunity to both + it is type 1.
It is just immunity to darkness and lightness manipulation. That's it. Day and night sound more support evidence for it.It needs to be changed to type 1 but it would cover light and dark, day and night, yin and yang, heaven and earth, and beginning and end.
TD is about immunity…How does he have immunity exactly Or where has he shown.
There’s characters who embody concepts who don’t gain conceptual manipulation or even immune or superior.
It says it’s about embodying and qualitatively superior or immune to effects caused within it.TD is about immunity…
Huh? He does not need to show immunity, alone the fact he is type 1 is enough for that.It says it’s about embodying and qualitatively superior or immune to effects caused within it.
where has mori shown immunity.
How can be To be type 1 already and He hasn’t shown to be qualitatively superior or immuneHuh? He does not need to show immunity, alone the fact he is type 1 is enough for that.
If Goku is stated to be capable of destroying the universe, does he need to do the feat to get the tier? I don't get you at all.How can be To be type 1 already and He hasn’t shown to be qualitatively superior or immune
so he’s not type 1??
even when I look at the characters pages who are listed under they feats are usually transcendence over these dualities not just a
compassing them.
Not in that context, lol. But in general terms, yes, and there is a FAQ about it. You can check it out.Qualitatively superior means being higher dimensional? Like a 4D being is qualitatively superior to a 3D being and a 5D being is qualitatively superior to a 4D being.
These are ways to acquire transduality, both cases will give you immunity, that's what transduality is all about, Mori will be immune to light and dark for transcending this dual systemIt says it’s about embodying and qualitatively superior or immune to effects caused within it.
where has mori shown immunity caused with it.
Ok.If Goku is stated to be capable of destroying the universe, does he need to do the feat to get the tier? I don't get you at all.
No, what you are asking is “feat”, and what we have is “statement”. + did you check the scans? Because I checked, and it sounds like he transcends the dual system presented there.Ok.
It’s not stated anywhere that not mori have transcended these dualities all the characters who are listed for transduality have proof of embodiment and transcendence for mori gain it is so vague.
Your logic would be if goku can destroy the universe he transcends the fabric of it.
Never knew we need feats for showing immunities lol. For me, type 1 is enough for that, even if it is a statement.goofy ass debate.
Ovens was rightgoofy ass debate.
I’m asking for anything that shows mori transcended these dualities not just embodying themNo, what you are asking is “feat”, and what we have is “statement”. + did you check the scans? Because I checked, and it sounds like he transcends the dual system presented there.
I meant become or became just another word I’m used to.From where did you get "embodying" part from? The scan never showed that.
Might be a better justification for it or â justification at all, if it’s done right.well, I must say that really, although there is clearly a duality, there is nothing about Mori transcending this dual system or being a non-dual
I see, in that case, transduality should be dropped or something could be put in as probably type 1 transdualityMight be a better justification for it or â justification at all, if it’s done right.
I thought of one but still vague imo.
No, atleast not one that would support this.