- 7,836
- 14,855
Watch him.Also you can not ignore the other evidence that @Deagonx did provided, but I let the other staff member handled it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watch him.Also you can not ignore the other evidence that @Deagonx did provided, but I let the other staff member handled it.
The discord screenshots showing my history aren’t fake. However if you have proof they are please post it.They prove no such thing. It would've been trivial to delete or omit any messages that actually implicated you, and you all have shown a willingness to lie.
First of all I made the comment you quoted in the beginning of that thread. Second, I made that comment because at the time before all of this evidence was posted I had no clue they were doing this. And lastly, I’ve only made a couple comments here and all of them have been defending myself.So I really don’t see the point in lying to act like we’ve been conspiring to get threads passed.
Yes, you did partake in it. You accused me of lying the same way that they did, and participated here as well when they tried to get me banned for the very lying you accused me of.
You're not helping the situation whatsoever by making these immature comments.oh my god just ban xearsay already!!!! ok bye.
Also unnecesary comment and most likely it will be deleted, don't comment here if you have nothing relevant to add here and this going for all who comment here without saying nothing relevant to this.oh my god just ban xearsay already!!!! ok bye.
This is exactly the kind of dishonesty I'm talking about. I didn't say they were "fake." I said it would be trivial to omit or delete any of the messages that incriminated you, so the screenshots do not mean anything as you have all demonstrated a willingness to lie.These aren’t fake. However if you have proof they are please post it.
I guess I made a mistake in reading. However this is still an assumption as there’s no proof that they deleted any comments I made. I’m also barely active in their group chat so I remember most of the comments I’ve made and none of them seem to be missing.This is exactly the kind of dishonesty I'm talking about. I didn't say they were "fake." I said it would be trivial to omit or delete any of the messages that incriminated you, so the screenshots do not mean anything as you have all demonstrated a willingness to lie.
mb, the beef was getting too excitingYou're not helping the situation whatsoever by making these immature comments.
We can't see what it says. Or do staff have the ability to see deleted ones?Wouldn't this deleted message wall comment (the first one) be grounds for a permaban?
honestly its not that offensive for perma ban.Wouldn't this deleted message wall comment (the first one) be grounds for a permaban?
It is grounds for a pretty long ban as far as I'm aware, like a few months to permanenthonestly its not that offensive for perma ban.
It is not homophobic just dislike of woke politics which is not ground for ban. We are not twitter.It is grounds for a pretty long ban as far as I'm aware, like a few months to permanent
At least a month should be fine.I also definitely agree with a ban, as this was a blatant hate-comment, but I am uncertain for how long, as the member in question said that the pride month is shit, not that everybody who participate in it are shit. It was deleted by the offender afterwards, so that might mitigate the ban length, but I do not know here either. Further staff imput, especially from administrators, would be very appreciated.
“A ******* month for this ******* shit” is most definitely targeted towards the LGBTQIA+ Community, with “this ******* shit” obviously referring to themthe member in question said that the pride month is shit, not that everybody who participate in it are shit
Not to move past the other issue (I agree with at least a month, that seems fine), but I'd like to deal with this too, aye.Anyway, regarding Transcending, Xearsay, Beyond_transcending, and the rest of their group, I have had bad experiences with them seemingly engaging in dishonest arguments and extreme stonewalling complete unreasonability regarding DC Comics in the past, which is the same kind of double-faced behaviour that they engaged in here: Accuse any opposition of doing what they are doing, or portray themselves as victims and create lots of drama if somebody voices suspicions.
As such, I think that the best solution would likely be to give all of them permanent topic bans, and the ones who were directly involved with trying to get Deagonx banned on false premises, temporarily banned themselves for a few months in addition to that.
Would any staff care to mention @PairusDragonoid so they can explain themself?
It happened a while ago, so my memories are fuzzy about it, but I had to deal with lots of attack posts and toxicity directed towards me a while back because I pointed out that they seemed to have misrepresented evidence at times in various DC Comics related discussion threads.Not to move past the other issue (I agree with at least a month, that seems fine), but I'd like to deal with this too, aye.
I can't really speak on these new accusations without proper evidence, so do you have some, Ant? Their recent behavior may imply a willingness to do such things but I'd like to see the pattern proven before acting on it.
That may very well be, but he did not say so outright, so we do not know for certain.“A ******* month for this ******* shit” is most definitely targeted towards the LGBTQIA+ Community, with “this ******* shit” obviously referring to them
Yes, agreed. The question is how severe we should consider the transgression to be in relation to our ban lengths.I don't believe it's within anyone's suggestion that we ban people strictly for disagreeing with beliefs, it's not thought policing we are doing to condemn extremely hateful commentary - we are well within our rights to remove something of that caliber.
A ban is in order, of course.
Is this offer still up? I found some new things and would like an equal chance to compile everything upYes, one of them can link to their main posts of arguments and evidence as well.
I cannot see that message wall for some reason; I can't see walls of permabanned users I know. But I thought I should at least be able to see things other Admins can see at minimum. But only Bureaucrats can see walls of permabanned users.Wouldn't this deleted message wall comment (the first one) be grounds for a permaban?