- 10,065
- 5,294
I'm still here as well. I've just been focusing more on the wiki side of things rather than the forum side lately.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, that is correct.I believe Ant simply means to refresh notifications for admins, as it is very easy for the forums to un-follow you from a thread depending on your exact interactions with it. That's all!
Yes. Would you be willing to handle it please?That is a very inappropriate joke; though he's been a long running use and doesn't normally talk like that. I think comment removal and strict warning should be enough.
Okay. A brief instruction message regarding that it is inappropriate language should probably be issues though.Meh, the warning doesn't even have to be strict at all, I don't even see it as such of a bad joke.
It was a reference to the weird pic they used for Whitebeard in that thread, and they only joked on that.
Imho, we could even let it slide, it's not offensive towards anyone and is an inside-joke for that thread alone.
It doesn't seem to be malicious edits, but the member in question has been warned previously about this kind of behaviour, so we probably need to ban them anyway.
I am not involved in any way, but I wanted to ask a question when a member gets warned once, and he does it once again, they get banned directly..?It doesn't seem to be malicious edits, but the member in question has been warned previously about this kind of behaviour, so we probably need to ban them anyway.
Would one or two months be appropriate?
I don't disagree the joke was that bad at least not to me. But the issue is that Fandom tends to get really sensitive when it comes to jokes that even mention bodily fluids and stuff. But has anyone already given them a warning? If not, I can do so.Meh, the warning doesn't even have to be strict at all, I don't even see it as such of a bad joke.
It was a reference to the weird pic they used for Whitebeard in that thread, and they only joked on that.
Imho, we could even let it slide, it's not offensive towards anyone and is an inside-joke for that thread alone.
Well, it depends on how severe the transgression was, but the member in question changed character statistics repeatedly, despite being told to stop, even though they likely did not mean any harm, so we need to try to make them take this issue seriously.I am not involved in any way, but I wanted to ask a question when a member gets warned once, and he does it once again, they get banned directly..?
I just saw this rn, i don't know the context of the report, what happend?Also, I noticed the report Hop posted forgot to ping @Bernkastelll who deserves the right to know. What you did wasn't that bad, but Fandom staff could easily take that the wrong way.
looks like that is @Bernkastelll Signature. Only user online on PC able to see that signatures.Hop dunno about this one, b0ssGyazo
gyazo.com
It got reported. Look above. I thought staff handled it and verbally warned him lol. Seems notlooks like that is @Bernkastelll Signature. Only user online on PC able to see that signatures.
btw i found that very hilarious.
@Bernkastelll It was this post, I know you didn't really mean any harm. But Fandom does tend to get sensitive to jokes like that.Hop dunno about this one, b0ssGyazo
gyazo.com
Oh, it wasnt really a joke, it is just my signature, but i will change it@Bernkastelll It was this post, I know you didn't really mean any harm. But Fandom does tend to get sensitive to jokes like that.
I have been notified that DemonicDude wishes to return to the forum.I personally think that the 2 months that he has been banned already should be sufficient punishment if he wishes to come back. His offences were not of a severe nature at all, as I see it. He was basically just being a bit obnoxious.
I think by “2 Months” Ant meant the 2 months DD has already servedI mean, I could be wrong, but 1 week =/= 2 months.
He was banned on 28th july so its 2 months....I mean, I could be wrong, but 1 week =/= 2 months.
That is correct, yes.I think by “2 Months” Ant meant the 2 months DD has already served
Are you black and if so does he know?Reporting @Arcker123 for displaying unnecessary aggression in this thread, here, here and here. Even after being given an official warning, Arcker shows no sign of changing his attitude on the thread.
Arcker123 has previously been officially warned here back in August for his consistantly aggressive attitude. A warning that he shows no regard for at all in his response to it.
No, I don't think his posts had a racist intent.Are you black and if so does he know?
This is one of the most dishonest things I’ve ever heard lmaoooooooooooo. I made a joking comment about you and explained how I didn’t mean much about it. This is a nothing burger, stop thinking that everything is aggression. I said one thing about you I contextualized.Reporting @Arcker123 for displaying unnecessary aggression in this thread
I explained what I meant here lmao. You were just being dumb and not responding to my arguments, hence why I called you a troll or an Ape (Which just means dumb). This is just me lightly clowning you after you annoyed me. This is not aggression.here
I was just explaining what I meant. Nothing bad here. Unless you think it’s bad to use the word “dumb” In a non insulting way.
See above. Nothing I said was beyond the casual banter people have between their friends. This isn’t meaningful.here
Because I think casual banter I have with people and after I contextualize my statements isn’t a big deal. As I said, this is just you being soft. Nothing here is report worthy at all lmao.Even after being given an official warning, Arcker shows no sign of changing his attitude on the thread.
Arcker123 has previously been officially warned here back in August for his consistantly aggressive attitude. A warning that he shows no regard for at all in his response to it.
Okay. I will unblock @DemonicDude then.DD falls into a very difficult position for me to judge and one where a lot of people voiced valid shit, albeit contrary to my initial analysis. So I'm gonna wait for some other input before opening my trap about it beyond this- I think a two-month ban is probably sufficient and I think the man will have learned, at least, to keep his own trap shut when it ought to be.
Yeah, not looking for a long block time. Maybe a couple of weeks at most.As for Arcker123, he does seem to have been very rude and not repentant about it, but a brief block should probably be enough.
My message was just light clowning/joking that I would do with my friends. I even explained why I did so. This is an overreaction. I didn’t intend for anyone to take it that seriously.As for Arcker123, he does seem to have been very rude and not repentant about it, but a brief block should probably be enough.
Lol. My response is just going to be ignored now?Yeah, not looking for a long block time. Maybe a couple of weeks at most.