Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you revert this?
Also, can you teach me how to revert edits? So, I can be helpful in the futureFnaf page was vandalized by this user
Thanks and I hope I can help with those issues in the future.From their response to my instruction, it seems like they made an error in their edit. Just keep an eye on them for now.
Also, can you teach me how to revert edits? So, I can be helpful in the future
There are some other ways of reverting; if it was just one edit, you can click the "undo" button. If it was just one person editing, and you have staff permissions, you can click the "rollback" button, which will undo all edits until the last one by a different user.
- Go into the page's history.
- Click the edit you want to revert to.
- Click the edit button.
- Save the edit as-is.
With all due respect Ant, that type of (understandably) visceral anger takes time to recover from and regardless of overturning the ban it's clear Confluctor needs time away from the VSBW (Again a "fun hobby" shouldn't be emotionally draining yet time and again it does).I would greatly appreciate if somebody who knows Confluctor well tries to convince him to come back to this community, as he has usually been an excellent and extremely helpful staff member as far as I am concerned.
Disrespect? I think you are trying to say, “With all due respect, Ant”.With all due disrespect Ant, that type of (understandably) visceral anger takes time to recover from and regardless of overturning the ban it's clear Confluctor needs time away from the VSBW (Again a "fun hobby" shouldn't be emotionally draining yet time and again it does).
The best thing to do is to forget about that whole debacle and move on. If Confluctor decides to come back just welcome him back with open arms, that's all.
Speaking as someone whose had generally nothing but positive experiences talking to Confluctor in the past.
Okay then. I just don't want him to think that he has been banned. He is very welcome back here whenever he wants.With all due respect Ant, that type of (understandably) visceral anger takes time to recover from and regardless of overturning the ban it's clear Confluctor needs time away from the VSBW (Again a "fun hobby" shouldn't be emotionally draining yet time and again it does).
The best thing to do is to forget about that whole debacle and move on. If Confluctor decides to come back just welcome him back with open arms, that's all.
Speaking as someone whose had generally nothing but positive experiences talking to Confluctor in the past.
I understand. I'm just upset, that's all. No further comments here.@ZoroNotZolo This isn't the thread for conversation.
1. I didn't lie. There are 4 votes in disagreement. 2 are neutral. 1 leans on disagreeing, the other wants Arceus to get all powersI am reporting @Sniper670 for his behavior in this thread.
During the last page, Sniper has repeatedly lied about votes and has attempted to invalidate @DontTalkDT's vote because he won't respond to his points, even though the thread is over. By continuing to repeat the same arguments even though the thread is done, he is also stonewalling.
1. Explained aboveFor context, even in his own vote tally, you can see that 4 staff do not disagree, but 2. The other 2 are neutral, and 3 are in agreement. This on it's own is misleading because @Moritzva and @The_real_cal_howard don't agree that Arceus's Plates are good enough evidence that Arceus can use every single Pokemon power.
Overall. All you've been doing for several hours now, is addressing anything but the main argumentOverall, he just needs a light warning for this behavior. Nothing here is ban worthy whatsoever, just bad faith.
Can you link the four staff votes in that thread that are in disagreement with the OP? That seems untrue.1. I didn't lie. There are 4 votes in disagreement. 2 are neutral. 1 leans on disagreeing, the other wants Arceus to get all powers
Alright, let's count up the votes from your most recent tally.1. I didn't lie. There are 4 votes in disagreement. 2 are neutral. 1 leans on disagreeing, the other wants Arceus to get all powers
First off, this is ad-hominem. Second of all, it is not relevant to the report and I do not know why you decided to include this information when this is RVR, not the Arceus CRT.Repeating an argument you failed to refute by repetetive talks about votes that isn't in your favor
1. Explained above
2. There was a recent trailer that literally confirms some things.
I brought it up and @InfiniteDay has not given me a reply till now. All he talks about is "its over", when it's not even close to it
Your recent comments literally confirms you didn't read it at all
First off: You cannot just invalidate votes because he feel like his argument isn't strong.DT argument doesn't fly. I made mention, Ant called him. I see no reason his argument holds value when
A. His argument falls on Arceus not habing the know how. Which won't work here as the concept of knowledge is literally just an aspect of Arceus
It will be extremely dishonest if we went like
"Okay DT never returned, so let's ignore your post and go with what DT says"
He's using the neutral votes as if they were disagree votes, and then adding back in the neutral votes.Can you link the four staff votes in that thread that are in disagreement with the OP? That seems untrue.
You don't seem to understand that neutral votes cannot be changed into other votes without the people who cast them saying otherwise. It doesn't matter if they may lean towards one side, they still are Inconclusive votes.You didn't get it?
4 in total against op
Amongst the 4, 2 are neutral. Amongst the 2, 1. Leans towards disagreeing, the other wants Arceus True Form to get everything
DT made an argument several pages ago, which was refuted. But upon several calls he never made it back
He's using the neutral votes as if they were disagree votes, and then adding back in the neutral votes.
@Everything12 wants Arceus to get everythingYou don't seem to understand that neutral votes cannot be changed into other votes without the people who cast them saying otherwise. It doesn't matter if they may lean towards one side, they still are Inconclusive votes.
The CRT is for arceus to lose everythingAlso, Arceus's True Form getting the powers is not what the CRT is about, and as such is irrelevant information.
Being neutral isn't the same as being in disagreement.You didn't get it?
4 in total against op
Amongst the 4, 2 are neutral. Amongst the 2, 1. Leans towards disagreeing, the other wants Arceus True Form to get everything
It doesn't change muchBeing neutral isn't the same as being in disagreement.
No, the CRT is quite literally about debunking Plates as evidence. It's even in the title.
The CRT is basically saying Arceus won't get anythingNo, the CRT is quite literally about debunking Plates as evidence. It's even in the title.
This is not the thread to debate about the Arceus CRT.And even Agnaa agrees after checking translations, Arceus gets powers because of the plates
This is not the thread to talk about the Arceus CRT. I'm not beating around the bush, i'm just not going to be debating you on RVR of all places.Look. Are you going to actually address the argument, or you're just going to beat around the bush?
I won't blame you. Your recent comment in the plates thread proves you didn't even read
This ^^^@InfiniteDay and @Sniper670 I'm just going to say this to and fro on the RVT doesn't look good for either of you, just stop arguing with each other here and leave it up to the mods before you both end up in hot water.
I'll comment no further on this subject.
You literally concededTo add to the report, my vote was being counted in a way that I never agreed to, in a CRT I never commented in or saw. I was never even notified that my vote was being counted like that.
As Iamunanimousinthat said in the thread, he was willing to concede on the point I brought up, so I'd lean more on the agree side. Even just going by what I said before seeing the thread, I agreed with the vast majority of the OP.