• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

OK, so I feel like This and This is taking things a little bit too far. I'm pretty sure when things get censored like that, it's Report Worthy but then he doubled down and called DaReaperMan a "sped".
 
OK, so I feel like This and This is taking things a little bit too far. I'm pretty sure when things get censored like that, it's Report Worthy but then he doubled down and called DaReaperMan a "sped".
I did respond harshly I will admit, but I don't much like repeating myself on stuff plus that thread is just... why. I take responsibility for my own insults there.
 
"Alright, listen here you spike-cocked, Tar-eyed, Plank-shaped, sewer-assed rodent analogue."
This is what Reaper said, since I feel like it shouldn't be overshadowed here. I'm not sure "Taking responsibility" for something really justifies it.
 
OK, so I feel like This and This is taking things a little bit too far. I'm pretty sure when things get censored like that, it's Report Worthy but then he doubled down and called DaReaperMan a "sped".
This thread is a deep breath from getting closed. It's the same exact one as before with
1. No new evidence
2. No scans
"Alright, listen here you spike-cocked, Tar-eyed, Plank-shaped, sewer-assed rodent analogue."
This is what Reaper said, since I feel like it shouldn't be overshadowed here. I'm not sure "Taking responsibility" for something really justifies it.
Wtf
 
In any case, I'm pretty sure DaReaperMan should get a minor warning for blowing up like that (even if I totally understand why) and the other guy should get a CRT Ban or something at least for not only his Report Worthy Language but because he's just stonewalling this Thread and refusing to adhere to current Site Rules.
 
Therefir probably forgot to lock the page after the revisions. Also, he put infinite and boundless in his other stats, obvious troll.
 
I honestly don’t think it should be locked really. This vandalism was an extremely rare occurrence and doesn’t often happen to his page. He also gets revisions like every other week, so it’s be a pain to constantly unlock and relock his page.
 
I honestly don’t think it should be locked really. This vandalism was an extremely rare occurrence and doesn’t often happen to his page. He also gets revisions like every other week, so it’s be a pain to constantly unlock and relock his page.
It can be left unlocked after the next revision.
 
For the record, this should be a last-warning for Reaper, at least for awhile. This sort of behavior has been fairly consistent from him, and I don't want it to continue any longer. @DaReaperMan If this continues, and another extremely foul-mouthed rant is reported here from you, I will suggest a ban. At least a short one.
 
I have no issue with MHA CRTs tbh

Even this last CRT was a compromise situation in all honesty.

It's just notifying the surge of "SoL MHA" to staff and others and showing that it isn't a rare occurence
I think it is a bit of an issue tbh. Some kind of Discussion Rule needs to be in effect. I've seen the topic come up so many times with Aoyama's laser, Radio Waves, lasers from these jets, etc.
 
I am open for suggestions regarding how we should best handle this. If a discussion rule is necessary, a draft for the text would also be appreciated.
 
Is some staff member here willing to start one?
 
Idk doesn’t it seem like much to create a rule abt talking about a topic? I mean isn’t that what forums are for? To discuss topics and opinions I mean not like your obligated to accept their calcs or scan or whatever if it’s not valid and it’s not offending anyone, creating a rule abt a topic because people are talking abt seems like it would remove the fun of theses forums as long as it’s not offensive and isn’t being spammed by the same person I don’t see how it could be a problem
 
Not everybody wants to have to argue about the same topic over and over and over again. It's tedious and time-wasting to argue in multiple CRTs about the same topic on a constant basis. Looking at you Dragon Ball.
But u don’t have to argue abt it, ur not obligated to especially if your not staff, I could see how it could be tedious for staff but you could make a page for why it isn’t accepted and link it for the CRTs that bring it up, instead of shutting the topic down
 
Back
Top