- 4,298
- 2,800
We will see what he does next. Wokistan has already messaged him, if they do it again we will ban them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I left a warning on his wall.
I blocked him for 3 months.reporting https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:KingJod23
for changing several ap sections across multiple god of war pages without cts.
Changed the 2-c to 2-b
Does this even need discussion?I'd like to report Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera because of them derailing in a CRT which was already delicate on its own with them doing that even intentionally because bias against me in these screen I've received.
They did that intentionally to make the CRT fail in short.
I'd like to report Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera because of them derailing in a CRT which was already delicate on its own with them doing that even intentionally because bias against me in these screen I've received.
They did that intentionally to make the CRT fail in short.
Does this even need discussion?
Dunno tbh, he already was against any Pokémon CRT which wasn't about his Physiology page and was always extremely toxic in such threads. But yeah, a month at minimum is necessary.It seems like he is an ongoing problem that needs to be dealt with then. For how long should we ban him?
Like what?"Man, I love derailing VSBW upgrade threads made by people I hate so they never get approved"
^Dunno tbh, he already was against any Pokémon CRT which wasn't about his Physiology page and was always extremely toxic in such threads. But yeah, a month at minimum is necessary.
EDIT: Infinite is good too.
Take also his previous behaviour towards Pokémon upgrades too.If he is intentionally causing ongoing harm to this community, I personally don't mind at least a year.
That if it was an ""accident"", but that was with clearly malicious intent.If he this bad then 6-9 months to the ocean at bare minimum. But again should we leave a warning at his face first?
Ditto.6 months to a year. Either end is good for me.
That'd be a good summary, yes. Even if your points are theoretically grounded in reason (in your opinion, at least), causing arguments just to keep CRTs from happening is unacceptable.So should we write "Systematically derailing content revision threads with self-stated malicious intent" as ban reason?