- 61,177
- 14,748
@Dark Regis has received multiple warnings over the past two years and made no effort to change or improve his attitude, and over the past few months he has steadily gotten worse.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports - 46
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- Status
CinnabarManx421
He/Him- 5,827
- 3,775
I still agree with a short ban. If Regis has been consistently acting like this even after multiple warnings, then how is another warning supposed to do anything? What's that quote from Einstein? "Keep doing the same thing and expecting different results then you're insane."
- 15,637
- 5,392
Fair point, Dark. To be fair I'm not very familiar with Regis' history so perhaps I wasn't in the correct position to make that claim.
- 11,099
- 4,323
Idk about Regus's previous warnings either, but Matt and co seem to make sense here.
- 61,177
- 14,748
If this had been a one time thing it would be different but this behavior has been persisting for two years with no signs of changing
- 10,758
- 6,491
He did seem like he was being unreasonable in that thread from what little I read of it. At least in how he was responding to arguments against him.
Neutral on a temporary ban.
Neutral on a temporary ban.
- 11,099
- 4,323
It's not like it's a one-time thing though, as Weekly said.
- 32,359
- 20,299
"I do believe Regis has been extremely uncooperative and unreasonable at times. He believes that his interpretation is the only true way, and will call any other possible interpretations "outright lies," when in fact multiple possible truths do indeed exist. It is representative of a significant dogma and biased towards one's own opinions above all others; granted, all of us are guilty of this to a certain extent, as is natural to all people, but I think not having room for an open mind can lead to an individual that is quick to disrupt arguments and disturb the peace. "
- Assaltwaffle
Here's some links:
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1352627
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1396883#95
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1409494#254
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1498646
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...Legends:_Ornn_vaporises_sea_Redo#comm-1766984
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1469826#300
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1924453
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1991238
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2005110
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1310252#150
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1409494#70
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1809985#138
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2358895#23
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2678404
- Assaltwaffle
Here's some links:
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1352627
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1396883#95
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1409494#254
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1498646
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...Legends:_Ornn_vaporises_sea_Redo#comm-1766984
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1469826#300
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1924453
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1991238
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2005110
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1310252#150
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1409494#70
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1809985#138
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2358895#23
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2678404
- 32,359
- 20,299
This is just something I grabbed in 5 minutes, mind you.
- 61,177
- 14,748
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2544242
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2714196
Here's two more
And this isnt even including the Nasuverse threads
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2714196
Here's two more
And this isnt even including the Nasuverse threads
Wokistan
Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 16,928
- 7,374
While I agree Regis is definitely an issue in this thread, it seems sort of hypocritical coming from you, matt. Much of what he's doing here is really not all that different from how you will bluntly call shit wank and tend to debate in a more aggressive than average style, which got you into some trouble on the RVT a little while ago (alongside a bunch of rather BS reports). Honestly, I don't think you calling something wank or regis calling something a lie is too terrible in itself, but the issue is one of consistency here. To call for a ban for this in spite of your own comments doesn't seem like a great idea. He's not the only one who may want to take steps to mellow out.
Weekly didn't really do anything wrong here though. Regis is definitely the problem here and his stubbornness has persisted a long time (Though I don't always disagree with him tbh), but i'm not really sure how I feel about a ban. Maybe a couple of weeks at most?
Weekly didn't really do anything wrong here though. Regis is definitely the problem here and his stubbornness has persisted a long time (Though I don't always disagree with him tbh), but i'm not really sure how I feel about a ban. Maybe a couple of weeks at most?
- 32,359
- 20,299
@Wokistan
I would advocate for a month. It seems long enough to give him some time to cool down, but also short enough that it isn't a permanent ban in all but name.
I would advocate for a month. It seems long enough to give him some time to cool down, but also short enough that it isn't a permanent ban in all but name.
- 10,758
- 6,491
Most of the links weren't actually that bad.
- 61,177
- 14,748
I can get it for you, it was from one of Regis' reports a few threads back
- 32,359
- 20,299
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1560507#145
Back in April of last year, and that's not even the first report Regis got.
Back in April of last year, and that's not even the first report Regis got.
- 10,758
- 6,491
BTW if we decide on a ban. I'd go for 2 weeks.
- 11,099
- 4,323
Quotes?SchroKatze said:
- 61,177
- 14,748
Yeah, and you know what happened? I changed my attitude. I got better. Regis didnt. There is no hipocricy. There is no double standard.
- 61,177
- 14,748
Gladly, i was having a severe panic attackSins32 said:
I have appologized for that night numerous times since then
- 16,289
- 14,694
@Matt, Commenting on your link dump for ease of access for everyone else. Warning that I'm only checking the posts linked and not the entire threads since I don't have ALL day, it's your job to compile information properly and clearly if you're reporting someone.
1. How is this reportable? Politely talking about changes to a profile on someone's wall.
2. How is this reportable? Just a normal post talking about feats, did you mean to link something else in the thread? There's no swears, hostile language, or being unreasonable here.
3. Since this links to Shrek's post I'm assuming you meant to link to Regis' one underneath. But that's still another non-hostile post discussing feats.
4. Starts off slightly hostile "Any proof, or just empty words and nonsensical scalings?", which is something that usually wouldn't even get a slap on the wrist, but from a quick glance the rest of the thread seems to be normally discussing feats.
5. Literally just asking for a source for a statement. Why is this being reported?
6. This is hostile/out of line, for sure.
7. Hostile/bad behaviour from Regis.
8. This is a long thread (planning on Regis' message wall for a CRT) that I don't want to fully read, but Regis calmly asked Matt to stop posting there multiple times. While those requests were stern, I didn't see them go out of line/stop being polite (and Matt's obstinate refusal to leave didn't help things out).
9. Again, I only checked the first couple of posts but it seemed to be polite discussion about feats.
10. This link has a post number of "150" even though there's only 72 posts in the thread. Anyway, from Regis' posts the worst thing he did was say that Weekly was lying two or three times.
11. Only checked the first few posts after this mention, but it seems like Weekly/Regis were both being slightly hostile. Regis was calling Weekly a liar, Weekly was using all caps sometimes, they were both accusing each other of bias and downplay. Not a pretty sight.
12. I checked a few posts in, it was mostly a civil conversation but Regis was being a little sarcastic and said that Weekly wanks characters.
13. I checked a few posts deep, Regis/Weekly were just arguing about feats. The most hostile thing I saw was Regis calling some evidence vague and unreasonable.
14. I checked partway into the thread, the most hostile thing was calling some feats "flimsy".
1. How is this reportable? Politely talking about changes to a profile on someone's wall.
2. How is this reportable? Just a normal post talking about feats, did you mean to link something else in the thread? There's no swears, hostile language, or being unreasonable here.
3. Since this links to Shrek's post I'm assuming you meant to link to Regis' one underneath. But that's still another non-hostile post discussing feats.
4. Starts off slightly hostile "Any proof, or just empty words and nonsensical scalings?", which is something that usually wouldn't even get a slap on the wrist, but from a quick glance the rest of the thread seems to be normally discussing feats.
5. Literally just asking for a source for a statement. Why is this being reported?
6. This is hostile/out of line, for sure.
7. Hostile/bad behaviour from Regis.
8. This is a long thread (planning on Regis' message wall for a CRT) that I don't want to fully read, but Regis calmly asked Matt to stop posting there multiple times. While those requests were stern, I didn't see them go out of line/stop being polite (and Matt's obstinate refusal to leave didn't help things out).
9. Again, I only checked the first couple of posts but it seemed to be polite discussion about feats.
10. This link has a post number of "150" even though there's only 72 posts in the thread. Anyway, from Regis' posts the worst thing he did was say that Weekly was lying two or three times.
11. Only checked the first few posts after this mention, but it seems like Weekly/Regis were both being slightly hostile. Regis was calling Weekly a liar, Weekly was using all caps sometimes, they were both accusing each other of bias and downplay. Not a pretty sight.
12. I checked a few posts in, it was mostly a civil conversation but Regis was being a little sarcastic and said that Weekly wanks characters.
13. I checked a few posts deep, Regis/Weekly were just arguing about feats. The most hostile thing I saw was Regis calling some evidence vague and unreasonable.
14. I checked partway into the thread, the most hostile thing was calling some feats "flimsy".
- 15,436
- 7,858
Can everyone just stop pointing fingers and shut the hell up? Everyone needs to calm down and discuss this rationally or we're never gonna accomplish anything.
- 15,436
- 7,858
Um, Matt? Why'd you delete Cell's comment when he didn't say anything wrong right after I told everyone to calm down?
- 32,359
- 20,299
Obvious sock, after the two Goku profiles made directly today and whose first comments were trolling posted directly on this thread, it's pretty obvious that a user called "Cell Dorado" who's profile was created today and whose first post in wiki was in this thread would also be a sock.
Regardless, you'll notice I deleted a lot of posts. This is because the thread is cluttered as is. All discussions of this should be moved to message walls, and only posts from Staff evaluating the Regis issue are allowed. This already went on for about 50 posts.
Regardless, you'll notice I deleted a lot of posts. This is because the thread is cluttered as is. All discussions of this should be moved to message walls, and only posts from Staff evaluating the Regis issue are allowed. This already went on for about 50 posts.
- 15,436
- 7,858
Alright, fair enough. I agree this should be a staff only discussion until tempers are cooled.
- 8,675
- 5,563
I'm not sure if a ban is warranted. The behavior isn't great but, honestly, that's behavior that many users dip into all the time, including multiple users already on this thread advocating for a ban. Just chill out.
Regis does have a history of being uncooperative and hostile, though, yes. If any ban is going to happen it should be short. I'd just suggest everyone involved learn how to step away from the computer and chill the **** out every now and then. It does wonders.
Regis does have a history of being uncooperative and hostile, though, yes. If any ban is going to happen it should be short. I'd just suggest everyone involved learn how to step away from the computer and chill the **** out every now and then. It does wonders.
- 13,341
- 2,898
sychopathic_Magicia
- 11,025
- 4,974
- 32,359
- 20,299
Infinite block.
- 2,874
- 543
Yeah, this is definitely a troll.
- 11,025
- 4,974
another troll he is posting ****
- 13,588
- 5,755
- 11,025
- 4,974
already been dealt withAnonymousBlank said:
- 8,427
- 3,145
- 168,988
- 78,012
- Thread starter
- #79
Regarding Regis, I personally think that Wokistan, Agnaa, Dargoo, The Wright Way, and Promestein make the most sense here.
Regis seems to have repeatedly engaged in stubborn and somewhat confrontational behaviour, but then so have two of the admins he has argued with, although probably to a lesser extent.
I can also relate to his feeling of being oppressed by an authoritarian society that severely punishes and silences any dissenting voices (regardless if they have all the statistical facts on their side), even though it is likely misplaced in this case.
It seems like a final strict warning is warranted, and if he continues we can apply a ban. However, it must be made clear to him that this really is his final warning, and he has to make an effort calm down and stop overreacting when things don't go his own way in the future.
Regis seems to have repeatedly engaged in stubborn and somewhat confrontational behaviour, but then so have two of the admins he has argued with, although probably to a lesser extent.
I can also relate to his feeling of being oppressed by an authoritarian society that severely punishes and silences any dissenting voices (regardless if they have all the statistical facts on their side), even though it is likely misplaced in this case.
It seems like a final strict warning is warranted, and if he continues we can apply a ban. However, it must be made clear to him that this really is his final warning, and he has to make an effort calm down and stop overreacting when things don't go his own way in the future.
- Status
