- 32,358
- 20,298
FTL
Planet level
Heracles vs Jack literally had Heracles getting crushed under a building falling due to gravity and failing to move out the way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FTL
Planet level
Heracles also is a tank fighter that doesn't dodge attacks, and it didn't even damage him.Heracles vs Jack literally had Heracles getting crushed under a building falling due to gravity and failing to move out the way.
For the feat of hermes are we sure it's a real moon/sun? Since their not seem to be in the normal universal of human.Heracles vs Jack literally had Heracles getting crushed under a building falling due to gravity and failing to move out the way.
I think he turned day into night.For the feat of hermes are we sure it's a real moon/sun? Since their not seem to be in the normal universal of human.
Here ya goNobody has posted this supposed feat I just heard it suddenly brought up.
Misunderstanding of powers. It'll be removed soon. He should only have Durability Negation and Light ManipulationStill wonder, How the hell Lu Bu got conceptual?
How ignore dura? I know it said can pierce any defense, but pierce in this state more like potency or sharpness of its than a form of durable negation.Misunderstanding of powers. It'll be removed soon. He should only have Durability Negation and Light Manipulation
The Valkyrie's ability allows Lu Bu's attacks to be effective against defenses/shields, bypassing the defenses/shields defense. which i s a form of Dura NegHow ignore dura? I know it said can pierce any defense, but pierce in this state more like potency or sharpness of its than a form of durable negation.
Where the part mentioned about bypassing defense? I just saw only "shield breaker".The Valkyrie's ability allows Lu Bu's attacks to be effective against defenses/shields, bypassing the defenses/shields defense. which i s a form of Dura Neg
Her name is shield breaker, which is her ability to damage/break defense much easier than normal, which is essentially bypassing its defense. Its not one of those directly saying it moments.Where the part mentioned about bypassing defense? I just saw only "shield breaker".
^^^ ThisI see no evidence that he literally moved the moon / the sun to make it dark. I'm sorry.
They're not even on Earth they're on Heaven and we don't know how day / night works there. This to me is no different than the Arena changing to become flooded or transforming into London for the Sasaki Kojiro and Jack the Ripper fights respectively.
People ask if the tier 5 is really valable since the 5-C feat is not proved since we see nowhere that the moon/sun were moved and that the 5-B are like title and hypeI believe we're finished now? It seems that everything has been wrapped up, but I may be wrong. If I am, i'd definitely prefer if someone corrected me.
We do have Zeus and Adam at possibly low 2-C for the big bang things, so I think a "possibly" on 3-A is reasonable.5-B should be fine, but universal power seems exaggerated based on what we have seen so far.
Why even zeus and adam have low 2-C thing? It's stated or tell nowhere that zeus tanked or made the big bangDo you suggest we change the profiles to possibly 3-A? If so, we might want to get other members who are knowledgeable on the verse to give their opinions, as that was a pretty big deal iirc.
Zeus considered the Big Bang to be a thrill, meaning he was there for it.Why even zeus and adam have low 2-C thing? It's stated or tell nowhere that zeus tanked or made the big bang
And that thing is pretty much a hype it's like the narrator talk about a prophecy than a real thing + with what we have see i don't even understand how you guy thing this is legit.Actually it was chapter 40, but ya I guess if there using some mythology stuff then I guess it should be somewhat legit I guess
Edit: also appertly his first technique(the dance) was supposed to bring about the destruction of the world
So there’s that to
And? He can be here and have see it from the outside, so was not in the range of the big bang, it's a really big assumption for me...Zeus considered the Big Bang to be a thrill, meaning he was there for it.
He's a battler, why would he consider it a thrill? He's never shown to care for visuals, and he consistently is shown having fun because of fights, and is sometimes portrayed as masochistic and sadistic.And? He can be here and have see it from the outside, so was not in the range of the big bang, it's a really big assumption for me...
The narrator doesn't give hype statements. I've explained this already.And that thing is pretty much a hype it's like the narrator talk about a prophecy than a real thing + with what we have see i don't even understand how you guy thing this is legit.
How can this be an assumption when we don't even know if the heaven is in the universe?, Not because he have fun because of fight that it show that he was here when the big bang was created and not because he don't usually care for visual that it will be the same here, the big bang is like the only big thing he have surely see.He's a battler, why would be consider it a thrill? He's never shown to care for visuals, and he consistently is shown having fun because of fights, and is sometimes portrayed as masochistic and sadistic.
It's a pretty massive assumption to say he just... viewed it from the outside of the universe.
The narrator doesn't give hype statements. I've explained this already.
We know heaven is separate from the universe, but i've literally already explained why he wouldn't care if it was just... visuals. You're arguing he thought it was a thrill because he saw it, which just makes literally no sense. It's a much bigger assumption to say he wasn't there, with much bigger leaps in logic.How can this be an assumption when we don't even know if the heaven is in the universe?, Not because he have fun because of fight that it show that he was here when the big bang was created and not because he don't usually care for visual that it will be the same here, the big bang is like the only big thing he have surely see.
The universal don't existed at that time so yeah except you tell he was particularly in the exact range if the big band i don't understand why you guy would asumme that he was here.
The Omniscient Narrator doesn't lie, and doesn't give hype statements.For the narrator you just tell that we considere it usually being valable, but here when he talked about most if the god that was just thing like title that people use for them or hype like lol he using the final techniques have just add flame to his body.
Why it would be not a thrill just because he doesn't care for visual in the common thing? Not like the creation of the universe is a common thing, even more when this statement was made from the present, at this time he could have been impressed or even that the creation for the universe was the only thrill thing for himWe know heaven is separate from the universe, but i've literally already explained why he wouldn't care if it was just... visuals. You're arguing he thought it was a thrill because he saw it, which just makes literally no sense. It's a much bigger assumption to say he wasn't there, with much bigger leaps in logic.
That's literally a massive assumption, for the reasons i've already given.Why it would be not a thrill just because he doesn't care for visual in the common thing? Not like the creation of the universe is a common thing, even more when this statement was made from the present, at this time he could have been impressed or even that the creation for the universe was the only thrill thing for him
This is a complete non-argument, dude. It only works under the assumption that he considered the big bang a thrill because he viewed it from an outside perspective, which goes against his character, and context from the story.You guy have like to prove that he was not in heaven for that
His character loves fighting, pain, is masochistic, and sadistic.He doesn't go against his character except if you know his character from some billion year. The context of the story just talk about him having a thrill when the big bang have appear no even one intention show for him to have tank this phenomenon, he will just directly if he had to it.
No, not really.It's a biggest assumption to tell that he was outside the heaven for this, when we doesn't even know if they can live outside an universe.
You're accusing me of wank? I could claim you're just trying to downplay Zeus and Adam with backwards and inconsistent logic.I will stop to talk about it since i have to sleep but for le all of this is just trying to wank from thing we don't even know exactly and i don't know how much thread were refused for that.