- 32,359
- 20,298
Heracles vs Jack literally had Heracles getting crushed under a building falling due to gravity and failing to move out the way.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Record of Ragnarok: Whatever the hell happened to this verse
- Thread starter OppaiSenpai5
- Start date
-
- Tags
- record of ragnarok
- Status
Heracles vs Jack literally had Heracles getting crushed under a building falling due to gravity and failing to move out the way.
- 4,451
- 1,949
Heracles also is a tank fighter that doesn't dodge attacks, and it didn't even damage him.
- 2,431
- 1,163
Also the building falling was turned into a Volund, we see when a pebble is turned into a Volund it leaves a crater in the side of Big Ben, so its not like a normal building falling down.
- 4,325
- 732
For the feat of hermes are we sure it's a real moon/sun? Since their not seem to be in the normal universal of human.
- 4,299
- 2,800
I think he turned day into night.
- 32,359
- 20,298
Nobody has posted this supposed feat I just heard it suddenly brought up.
- 13,587
- 5,754
- 32,359
- 20,298
I see no evidence that he literally moved the moon / the sun to make it dark. I'm sorry.
They're not even on Earth they're on Heaven and we don't know how day / night works there. This to me is no different than the Arena changing to become flooded or transforming into London for the Sasaki Kojiro and Jack the Ripper fights respectively.
They're not even on Earth they're on Heaven and we don't know how day / night works there. This to me is no different than the Arena changing to become flooded or transforming into London for the Sasaki Kojiro and Jack the Ripper fights respectively.
- 667
- 127
Still wonder, How the hell Lu Bu got conceptual?
- 2,431
- 1,163
Misunderstanding of powers. It'll be removed soon. He should only have Durability Negation and Light Manipulation
- 667
- 127
How ignore dura? I know it said can pierce any defense, but pierce in this state more like potency or sharpness of its than a form of durable negation.
- 2,431
- 1,163
The Valkyrie's ability allows Lu Bu's attacks to be effective against defenses/shields, bypassing the defenses/shields defense. which i s a form of Dura Neg
- 667
- 127
Where the part mentioned about bypassing defense? I just saw only "shield breaker".
Last edited:
- 2,431
- 1,163
Her name is shield breaker, which is her ability to damage/break defense much easier than normal, which is essentially bypassing its defense. Its not one of those directly saying it moments.
- 3,303
- 2,697
^^^ This
The best on-panel feats are Tier 7 ... There should be no discussion of upgrading to Tier 5 based just on hype statements
- 3,303
- 2,697
Also, the mythological event that is Shiva's Tandav - is the destruction of the Universe, rather than just the planet. It could even be Multiversal destruction because there is a story in the Ramayan which references parallel universes : mound of rings
Not related to anything. Just an interesting tidbit of Indian mythology
Not related to anything. Just an interesting tidbit of Indian mythology
- 13,587
- 5,754
Looking back over the Shiva stuff, if we are taking the “sustains the Ganges” as a literal feat, will be doing the same with Shiva’s introduction as Bhairava of the Cosmos (Bhairava translating to “he who creates, sustains and destroys”)?
Edit: Speaking of sustaining feats, doesn’t the recent thread on them make the Ganges null since we now need a bunch of proof that it will be immediately destroyed without X sustaining it?
Edit: Speaking of sustaining feats, doesn’t the recent thread on them make the Ganges null since we now need a bunch of proof that it will be immediately destroyed without X sustaining it?
Last edited:
- 4,451
- 1,949
I believe we're finished now? It seems that everything has been wrapped up, but I may be wrong. If I am, i'd definitely prefer if someone corrected me.
- 4,325
- 732
People ask if the tier 5 is really valable since the 5-C feat is not proved since we see nowhere that the moon/sun were moved and that the 5-B are like title and hype
- 4,451
- 1,949
Ah, ok. Well, Shiva's 5-B (potentially universal statement according to RoyGundam said) should still work, as it was the narrator.
We usually consider narrator statements legitimate, as it's the omniscient narrator and there's no reason the narrator would make hype statements, he's there to explain what's going on and give lore.
Do we just put Shiva at "at least 5-B, possibly 3-A"? It just says "universe", and the cosmology is vague, so that might be the safest option.
We usually consider narrator statements legitimate, as it's the omniscient narrator and there's no reason the narrator would make hype statements, he's there to explain what's going on and give lore.
Do we just put Shiva at "at least 5-B, possibly 3-A"? It just says "universe", and the cosmology is vague, so that might be the safest option.
- 4,451
- 1,949
With his ultimate technique, of course.
- 4,451
- 1,949
We do have Zeus and Adam at possibly low 2-C for the big bang things, so I think a "possibly" on 3-A is reasonable.
If it doesn't get agreed on, that's fine, it's just a "possibly" anyway.
- 4,451
- 1,949
Do you suggest we change the profiles to possibly 3-A? If so, we might want to get other members who are knowledgeable on the verse to give their opinions, as that was a pretty big deal iirc.
I was never involved in that discussion, I just remember it being a big discussion.
I was never involved in that discussion, I just remember it being a big discussion.
- 4,325
- 732
Why even zeus and adam have low 2-C thing? It's stated or tell nowhere that zeus tanked or made the big bang
- 4,451
- 1,949
Zeus considered the Big Bang to be a thrill, meaning he was there for it.
- 4,325
- 732
And that thing is pretty much a hype it's like the narrator talk about a prophecy than a real thing + with what we have see i don't even understand how you guy thing this is legit.Actually it was chapter 40, but ya I guess if there using some mythology stuff then I guess it should be somewhat legit I guess
Edit: also appertly his first technique(the dance) was supposed to bring about the destruction of the world
So there’s that to
- 4,325
- 732
And? He can be here and have see it from the outside, so was not in the range of the big bang, it's a really big assumption for me...
- 4,451
- 1,949
He's a battler, why would he consider it a thrill? He's never shown to care for visuals, and he consistently is shown having fun because of fights, and is sometimes portrayed as masochistic and sadistic.
It's a pretty massive assumption to say he just... viewed it from the outside of the universe.
The narrator doesn't give hype statements. I've explained this already.
- 4,325
- 732
How can this be an assumption when we don't even know if the heaven is in the universe?, Not because he have fun because of fight that it show that he was here when the big bang was created and not because he don't usually care for visual that it will be the same here, the big bang is like the only big thing he have surely see.
The universal don't existed at that time so yeah except you tell he was particularly in the exact range if the big band i don't understand why you guy would asumme that he was here.
- 4,451
- 1,949
We know heaven is separate from the universe, but i've literally already explained why he wouldn't care if it was just... visuals. You're arguing he thought it was a thrill because he saw it, which just makes literally no sense. It's a much bigger assumption to say he wasn't there, with much bigger leaps in logic.
- 4,451
- 1,949
The Omniscient Narrator doesn't lie, and doesn't give hype statements.
Also, visuals don't mean that's all it did. It added flames, but it was also a power boost.
- 4,325
- 732
Why it would be not a thrill just because he doesn't care for visual in the common thing? Not like the creation of the universe is a common thing, even more when this statement was made from the present, at this time he could have been impressed or even that the creation for the universe was the only thrill thing for him
You guy have like to prove that he was not in heaven for that
- 4,451
- 1,949
That's literally a massive assumption, for the reasons i've already given.
This is a complete non-argument, dude. It only works under the assumption that he considered the big bang a thrill because he viewed it from an outside perspective, which goes against his character, and context from the story.
- 4,451
- 1,949
Also, why would Zeus compare the thrill of the fight to the Big Bang if he wasn't there? Why would he compare a physical brawl to a cool looking visual??
- 4,325
- 732
He doesn't go against his character except if you know his character from some billion year. The context of the story just talk about him having a thrill when the big bang have appear no even one intention show for him to have tank this phenomenon, he will just directly if he had to it.
It's a biggest assumption to tell that he was outside the heaven for this, when we doesn't even know if they can live outside an universe.
I will stop to talk about it since i have to sleep but for le all of this is just trying to wank from thing we don't even know exactly and i don't know how much thread were refused for that.
It's a biggest assumption to tell that he was outside the heaven for this, when we doesn't even know if they can live outside an universe.
I will stop to talk about it since i have to sleep but for le all of this is just trying to wank from thing we don't even know exactly and i don't know how much thread were refused for that.
- 4,451
- 1,949
His character loves fighting, pain, is masochistic, and sadistic.
No, not really.
You're accusing me of wank? I could claim you're just trying to downplay Zeus and Adam with backwards and inconsistent logic.
You're using multiple fallacious arguments, there's no reason for you to claim wank other than your bias against it.
- Status
Similar threads
