I think the discussion should continue there. Considering this deletion proposal isn’t really about talking about how the profile violates the wiki guidelines or editing rules but rather the character itself.
vsbattles.fandom.com
There is also this one:Issei Hyoudou (Anime)
Self-explanatory
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
Is anyone gonna help me out here?
Chuck E Cheese (Nintendo)
Chuck E Cheese is a main character in multiple Nintendo licensed games. He is the owner of, and the one who runs, the Chuck E Cheese franchise. Tier: 10-A physically, 9-C with sport equipment, 9-B with Go Kart, 9-A with Spaceship Name: Chuck E Cheese Origin: Chuck E Cheese's (Nintendo) Gender...
I mean, there are no sources, the profile lacks calcs, and it doesn't even go out of its way to explain what games it's even talking about. The only Chuck E. Cheese game I can think of that fits under the Page's criteria is a Wii shovelware game that feels more like a commercial than the Ronald McDonald Klasky-Csupo cartoons and the Goldfish commercials (which are actual short cartoon episodes with lore!).
The verse should’ve been deleted far long ago. I agree with this proposal.
I hope there's not a misunderstanding. I'm not proposing a deletion of the Tokyo Revengers verse as a whole. I'm talking about deleting all pages created by this sock puppet account.
I think it's probably best to remove those and let the other supporters handle it if they see fit.
Seems reasonable to delete them.
Yeah, ik we’re just deleting the pages the sock created. Just expressing my thoughts upon the verse due to its dreadful history.
I suppose we’re all in consensus here. Should I go ahead and initiate the operation?
We’ll remove the links from other pages; it shouldn’t be difficult other than being a tedious effort.Other, valid, Tokyo Revengers pages may link to and scale from those pages though, which complicates the issue.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Which is essentially a metaphorical “etc”…. on a page..
See the feats section. It has a respect thread with everything.The White Queen (Blood Sign)
The White Queen is an Unexplored-class Material, one of the beings who lurk beyond the gods in the other world. An incarnation of benevolence, the anthropomorphism of radiance, a symbol of sanctity, holiness, justice, strength, beauty, righteousness, etc; the White Queen is at the peak of the...
This page was mentioned to me off-site as a potential deletion-worthy page.
Looking at it, the page has lots of high tier hax w/o scans, unscanned AP section, formatting issues, and some genuinely concerning stuff that make it notably worse than the typical old page.
Like for example:
Which is essentially a metaphorical “etc”…. on a page..
@DontTalkDT you seem to have edited it a bit. Do you have issue with me deleting it?
The respect thread can go to hell, get the scans and references on the profile
Old profile needs no references to begin with by the rules. Feel free to add them from the blog though if it's important to you.
High tier hax without scans was one of the reasons it's up for deletion, as well as no scans for AP
And the scans exist in the respect thread. We have no rules that say they need to exist and, as far as proof goes, it is accessible from the page. I.e. it's no reason to be deleted as all proof required had already been provided.
That respect thread is from 2016. I'd get it re-evaluated...
vsbattles.fandom.com
They aren't Tokyo Revengers profiles. They're a hodge podge of different verses that no one has created profiles for except this individual, in most cases.Other, valid, Tokyo Revengers pages may link to and scale from those pages though, which complicates the issue.
Like 3. For specific things. If there's more, I can't find em
standards can, however, change a lot between 2016 and 2024. Hence the re-evaluation.
Book verses shouldn't be exempt, DT.
There are dozens. Have you, like, not opened the collapsables or something?
We don't do periodical reevaluation of profiles. When have you ever seen that done? Heck, what the hell is a reevaluation thread even supposed to be like? "Here's a CRT to approve things already approved for the profile"? lol
There is no exception to any rule being proposed.
No, more like that you have no actual complaint, so don't comment.
Ok so trial and error, the problem is is that's using the worst collapsibles in the history of ever. If you click on stuff like "White Queen - Power 1", you'll see it's actually a collapsible and will extend out to show some quotes. The problem is that they're not labelled as a collapsible, such as by being like, highlighted blue or in brackets or whatnot that you usually see, so it's incredibly counter-intuitive and honestly just awful
They used to look better, but fandom changed the code.
The profile follows LazyHunter's design philosophy, which I personally rather like.
