Lou_change
He/Him- 10,191
- 5,415
Only one tale has that characterization if I recall and that was more likely just the overpowered antagonist.2747 is a legitimate character. She's the Queen of Black Thorns.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only one tale has that characterization if I recall and that was more likely just the overpowered antagonist.2747 is a legitimate character. She's the Queen of Black Thorns.
Those are all the scans that i findedGive a link and prove it doesn't contradict anything.
the last one does, the others are support scansGreat it is super natural none of those proves it is a character or weapon it is still just a series of events that result in the destruction of a narrative and itself.
I mean in canon it canonically manifastate as event and stuff, they even say it's smart, it's not just a random eventGiven the nature of the story it is most likely a form of symbolism especial given the scarlet king is the antagonist and the key identifier of the anafabula is that it invariably represents an in-universe antagonist them appearing like that contradicts it's nature.
in the scans that i sended, they said "But the lady of black thorns was clever". Also we should put another key for his inteligenceOkay where.
The lady of black thorns is not the anomaly itself also is the anti narrative transgender. Even if it is smart that is extended canon.in the scans that i sended, they said "But the lady of black thorns was clever". Also we should put another key for his inteligence
This would need a CRT, we are in rule violation reports not in SCP discussionOk even if we go that route it should at least have the fact it causes it's own destruction and lose type 8.
Still a part of 2747The lady of black thorns is not the anomaly itself also is the anti narrative transgender. Even if it is smart that is extended canon.
It should be deleted too.
Yes they have reliable statements of being characters.Hell, is there even a great distinguishing line between characters like that, and supreme beings without personifications, who act as prime movers rather than actively-meddling gods?
That is like saying all stars need to die for the sun to die, it doesn't randomly pop up it is unintentionally made as it is canonically a series of tropes inside a storyIt should not lose "possibly type 8". It spontaneously pops up in narratives even if it's killed, presumably all narratives would need to be destroyed to prevent it from popping up again somewhere.
To "The Giant Claw", if I understood correctly.Move it to where?
NoThat's an ancient profile, has it never had a P/A section?
^This^It's so pathetic it's noteworthy imo
I mean, we have deleted 10-Cs that do nothing but stand there and die before. Real World stuff is there mainly for reference purposes, but otherwise they would have been deleted as well.It's so pathetic it's noteworthy imo
I am marking Anthrax for deletion for the sheer lack of a Powers and Abilities section
What are these profiles, did they have feats of their own?I mean, we have deleted 10-Cs that do nothing but stand there and die before.
I don't understand why though, we don't need profiles like Brain Coral or Prokaryotic Cells for reference.Real World stuff is there mainly for reference purposes, but otherwise they would have been deleted as well.
This isn't about capabilities though, sure, I agree that tier 10s with no notable traits such as regular humans should not be allowed on the wiki, as this would result in duplication of essentially the same profile with different names. But for a creature with a defining character trait, even if said character trait goes against the character itself, the profile should be fine, the Glonk has unique design, story, traits, and feats. So should be more than valid for a profile.Keeping the page also would set a bad precedent to allow virtually any tier 10 to be indexable regardless of capabilities just out of being "comatose" or the like.
Folk (Autonauts) comes to mind, but it was about the same as this and got removedWhat are these profiles, did they have feats of their own?
I don't understand why though, we don't need profiles like Brain Coral or Prokaryotic Cells for reference.
This isn't about capabilities though, sure, I agree that tier 10s with no notable traits such as regular humans should not be allowed on the wiki, as this would result in duplication of essentially the same profile with different names. But for a creature with a defining character trait, even if said character trait goes against the character itself, the profile should be fine, the Glonk has unique design, story, traits, and feats. So should be more than valid for a profile.
Yeah, IIRC that was the case.I believe that profile was completely incapable of fighting, the Glonk is (technically) physically capable of fighting under the right conditions.
There are dozens of Haxless Tier 10s on the wiki, such as the likes of Common Infected from Left 4 Dead, 8 year old Clementine from the Walking Dead, among many others. These are essentially profiles for regular humans but we've allowed these. Along with the Plants and Cells of the real world. If we aren't going to allow Tier 10 profiles then why do we have Tier 10 in the first place?
Once again, I'm not against disallowing Haxless Tier 10 Human profiles, since, again, they would be copied profiles over and over under different names. But for original characters or creatures who are just notably weak, but have some notable fictional trait, there should not be anything against them. The Glonk is massively more notable than any regular human profile would be for indexing on this wiki because of its traits.
We're an indexing wiki first, which means we index notable characters, weapons, and more. We index their traits, powers, statistics. The Glonk profile has done exactly that. Simply because it is weak, or dies by its own nature, does not mean it should be disregarded by the wiki. That is notable in terms of originality in this case, as the likes of a human profile with no abilities, compared to another human profile with no abilities would look identical on this wiki. But the Glonk profile stands out because of its noteworthy traits, so should stay.