- 16,118
- 12,615
- Thread starter
- #281
We don't allow compositing characters anymore in this wiki.That's what we do from compositing tho.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We don't allow compositing characters anymore in this wiki.That's what we do from compositing tho.
This happened to me once and I have never felt greater pain on this siteI am rage I am misery I am in spain without the s, I wrote a poggers textwall argument but accidentally clicked off site and it didn't draft
fits them well enoughDDM told me in DMs
Nu mean ùwúfits them well enough
I personally subscribe to Option A more, I have no issues with Option B but am slightly worried it would be executed in a way that leaves out Tier and AP values we have access to out of conveniences sake. Even if those issues were resolved I still prefer option AAt the end of the day the notion stated is, "They're meant to be like Cartoon Characters", the way Cartoon characters work, old timey ones, is essentially every episode is meant to be independent of the last, there are callbacks yes, but they're mostly meant to be cute references rather than any legitimate implication of canon. You can look at Tom and Jerry where there are bajillion stories where either Tom or Jerry are put in irreparable situations that'd change the course of the series by the end of each episode, but they act like it never happened. Mickey Mouse can just have vastly different origins and living situations in every episode that have NO continuity whatsoever. The cartoon timeline is meant to represent a "narrative first, continuity negligible" mindset.
If each game is an episode, like how DDM told me in DMs, then each game is non-canon to prior and doesn't scale. Of course there are exceptions, there is a thing called convenient canon where a few games can have temporary canon to each other but then the series goes back to the cartoon continuity.
Now in terms of indexing we can reconcile it like this:
- Option A: We gives files for each iteration of Mario, games which are direct sequels are assumed to be conveniently canon to each other for indexing convenience as well as logical sense. This will yield about 20-30ish files for each major character, to be added overtime, with the priority ones being focused first
- Option B: We don't split Mario and give him a Varies tier, not necessarily for inconsistency alone, but instead acknowledging Mario's statistics and powers are subject to the game's direction, and do not operate by conventional canon logic, each individual game and group of canon games are still subject to feat consistency within themselves. Essentially this is all the previous to-be-split files assumed to be keys, and listed in a varies for uncertain canon and indexing convenience.
I can imagine the main cast such as Mario Luigi Peach Bowser etc reaching upwards of 25 or so profiles, but no other characters would likely exceed 10 yeahFiles would also be way less than 20 or 30, unless people are intent on creating profiles for every single obscure game (stuff like Yoshi's Safari) we'd likely have ten or so canons at best.
Nu mean ùwú
I mean you've gotI can imagine the main cast such as Mario Luigi Peach Bowser etc reaching upwards of 25 or so profiles, but no other characters would likely exceed 10 yeah
Here’s my list of 20 or so, obviously not all will get profiles, nor should they, but it shows there’s a lotOk, for those interested in splitting Mario by Mini-Franchise, here’s all of them of note
Donkey Kong
Game and Watch
Mario Kart
Super Mario Bros.
Dr. Mario
Super Mario Land
Mario Sports (Golf, Tennis. Mix, Strikers etc. etc.)
Super Mario World
Super Mario RPG
Hotel Mario
Mario Party
Mario 64
Paper Mario
Mario and Luigi
Mario Sunshine
Luigi’s Mansion
Mario Galaxy
3D Land/World
New Super Mario Bros.
Mario vs Donkey Kong
Mario Maker
Mario + Rabbids
Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games
Super Mario Run
Obviously not all of these deserve profiles, some don’t even meet our standards, but uh, there they are
That is indeed how that works. Anyway I thought we were avoiding whataboutisms?Apparently he has an in universe explanation for that, something about corny power of friendship being able to increase the power of the chaos emeralds or something like that being used for why Super Sonic can sometimes be 2-C instead of Low 2-C
I personally subscribe to this option if the alternative is a Varies tier.
- Option A: We gives files for each iteration of Mario, games which are direct sequels are assumed to be conveniently canon to each other for indexing convenience as well as logical sense. This will yield about 20-30ish files for each major character, to be added overtime, with the priority ones being focused first
Slow down you gonna jinx yourself there is staff support for alternative optionsIt seems as if my idea is gaining some traction to the point of becoming true
Finally, I can tell my kids that I'm the one partially responsible for Mario's Varies tier
I'm pretty sure the canons could be pretty solidly condensed like:I strongly disagree with the concept of listing characters as varies because of uncertain canon. We can determine what belongs to what canon with a good level of certainty and keeping P&A fused while only splitting stats just leads to a half-composite Frankenstein's profile if we accept that Mario has several canons. It's also highly misrepresentative since Mario has variations in P&A between games.
Files would also be way less than 20 or 30, unless people are intent on creating profiles for every single obscure game (stuff like Yoshi's Safari) we'd likely have ten or so canons at best.
Listed as Mario vs Donkey KongDonkey Kong (Arcade Series) + Mario vs Donkey Kong
Not neededGame and Watch
Listed as Mario KartMario Kart
The original game and sequels listed as aboveSuper Mario Bros.
Someone can make it if they want I guess but not really neededDr. Mario
Game and Sequels listed as aboveSuper Mario Land
Listed as Mario SportsMario Sports (Golf, Tennis. Mix, Strikers etc. etc.)
Game and sequels listed as aboveSuper Mario World
Listed as Super Mario RPGSuper Mario RPG
Not needed, also already exists but could prob be deleted maybeHotel Mario
Listed as Mario PartyMario Party
Listed as Mario 64Mario 64
Listed as Paper MarioPaper Mario
Listed as Mario & Luigi (I feel like Paper Jam was more a crossover type thing and that the two verses are distinct)Mario and Luigi
Listed as Mario SunshineMario Sunshine
Listed as Luigi’s MansionLuigi’s Mansion
Listed as Mario GalaxyMario Galaxy
Games and Sequels listed as 3D Land3D Land/World
Listed as New Super Mario Bros. Can fuse with Super Bros. if you want I guessNew Super Mario Bros.
Probs doesn’t need standardsMario Maker
Game and sequels listed as Mario + RabbidsMario + Rabbids
Both debatable on if they meet standardsMario and Sonic at the Olympic Games
Super Mario Run
Varies imo.I appreciate the debate on how a profile split should turn out, but I think we should find a consensus on what to do before debating how any of the options should play out.
What’s the vote count between options A and B anyways? There’s been pretty decent input so we might not be that far off a decisionI appreciate the debate on how a profile split should turn out, but I think we should find a consensus on what to do before debating how any of the options should play out.
I have no issue with varies but it should represent as much info as the split profiles. This is really a matter of presentation for me as I feel not listing AP values we can rather easily find for the sake of convenience, or worse, aesthetics, is really dumbI personally prefer more a Varies as it represents the intention of the character better while also easing editing.
Granted Option A is still my preference by a decent amount, I’m just not offended by varies if executed rightI have no issue with varies but it should represent as much info as the split profiles. This is really a matter of presentation for me as I feel not listing AP values we can rather easily find for the sake of convenience, or worse, aesthetics, is really dumb
Tbh I'm more neutral, I'm fine with either, just depends on what ends up being better and more consistent and cohesive in the long run.
I like this suggestion, however I don't think M&L should be condensed into Super Mario. They are spin-offs after all, not mainline games.I'm pretty sure the canons could be pretty solidly condensed like:
Super Mario (og 2D & 3D games)
New Super (could probably be condensed into Super Mario)
Paper Mario
Mario Party
Mario & Luigi (could be condensed into Super Mario honestly)
Mario Kart (does this even need a profile???)
Mario + Rabbids
Keep the Wario, Yoshi, and DK series' separate as well.
I have no idea where to constitute SMRPG btw lol.
A lot of Mario's smaller franchises or spinoff like Mario Land, Mario Maker, and Mario v DK for instance barely add anything in terms of feats or abilities and could generally be ignored or just condensed elsewhere, no need for their own profiles. I'm sure many of them don't even meet our standards for profiles in the first place.
Mario Land
Lumping all that stuff together literally just keeps put the issues that mean we’re even considering the split, a hefty amount of the anti-feats are still gonna be there and 3-C still not ok for Super Bros. Most of the 3D games themselves are deserving of unique files each, never mind lumping ALL of them into what is already one of the most condensed files for MarioI think it has some good points but condenses Super Mario Bros. WAYYYYYYY too much, M&L, the 3D Games, and possibly New Super probably don’t belong in there
Decades of time, a slew of new characters and abilities, I can see why people would argue both the two being fused and remaining separateOption A seems better option. Tho what would make NSMB distinctively that much different from SMB to make that into a separate page?
On this topic, it's a bit of a can of worms.That's just inconsistency, not basis for Varies.