game mechanic
the phoenix argument makes more sense though. One thing, the anime only introduced it because the games didn't introduce anything useful regarding that side.
Introduced Ho-Oh, you mean?
Despite it being typed & named after the Phoenix & not really doing much phoenix-related in the anime?
I'd say it's classification as such began with the games more than the anime.
Plus, there might be something to do with "rebirth" with what happened to the Brass/Burned Tower, which prompted Ho-Oh to leave the Bell/Tin Tower, supposedly in search of a pure-hearted trainer.
I mean the fact that they got paralleled later and were already generally parallel to each other in the two games shows that they, by logic, are meant to parallel each other. It wouldn't be surprising for them to share similarities, which they already do.
Their similarities are being flying Pokemon that have lived at towers.
One is aquatic, the other travels a lot.
I think they parallel each other in themes, but not much else.
Plus, Lugia was designed primarily for a movie, no?
I get the point but just because they behave somewhat differently doesn't mean they can't have babies at some point. It's not a common thing either as otherwise we'd have skies full of lugias.
But with the phoenxi stuff, Pokemon like Ho-Oh being identifiable as "Gender Unknown", yet known for decades, if not centuries suggests it may just live a really long time rather than reproduce.
We haven't seen much evidence it can, other than Lugia having babies only in the anime, as opposed to the games, where both have no signs they can reproduce in addition to game mechanics preventing them doing so.
As you said "otherwise we'd have skies full of lugias"
(Which should be "seas full of Lugia".), we haven't seen skies full of multiple Ho-Oh, despite it being known to fly around the world. If it did reproduce, where are the others.
I'd say that in fiction, just because it's organic doesn't mean it reproduces.
bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net
Verifiable & fair. (But I still attest that Lana is an unreliable, frequent liar on other occasions. Ex: The many times she claimed ripples in water were hunky swimmers, or that the rain in a route in the games was from a Kyogre.)
It's also curious because Lana has lied about finding Kyogre a few times, IIRC, especially in the anime; That anime could be meant as a "payoff" on her running gag of fishing catches by being made so that she actually did "catch" a Kyogre then release it, as fish do.
As is, multiple Kyogre existing is strange for the mythology. Ex:
Sapphire | Kyogre is named in mythology as the Pokémon that expanded the sea by covering the land with torrential rains and towering tidal waves. It took to sleep after a cataclysmic battle with Groudon. |
---|
Not to mention the orb specifically for it.
Where are the other Groudon, too?
I won't deny Lana did indeed meet a Kyogre, even if an episode featuring a Kyogre being made for the anime (Which many often find questionable with stuff like Thunder Armor & whatnot.) for a character who repeatedly lied about fishing up a Kyogre is suspicious from an out-of-universe standpoint, & concerning from an in-universe standpoint.
sure but that doesn't mean it is genderless and by evidence of it given birth we can assume it is female. Additionally, game mechanics, yet again.
There are repeated statements on Pokemon being gender unknown, so I wouldn't call it game mechanics.
bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net
Regarding the topic you &
@omegabronic have been participating in the 2 most recent posts, I would prefer to leave you two to handle that yourselves. Sorry. No offense meant.